Uganda - Uganda Premier LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

URA vs Vipers: match statistics

URA crest
URA
0 : 2half-time 0:1
Vipers crest
Vipers
120%(0.00)
X25%(0.00)
255%(0.00)

Vipers SC presents decidedly better form and statistics this season, occupying first place in the table with an impressive record of 8 wins, 3 draws, and 0 losses. The visiting team shows particular defensive solidity in away matches, conceding an average of just 0.4 goals per match and keeping a clean sheet in 60% of away games. URA, meanwhile, sits in 12th position in the table and presents poor form, losing 4 of the last 5 matches overall with a points balance of 0.6 PPG. The hosts have not kept a clean sheet in any home match this season, which, given Vipers' efficiency (1.4 goals on average away), puts them in a disadvantageous situation. The difference in quality between the two teams, confirmed by both table position and xG indicators (2.1 vs 1.91 for attack, 1.33 vs 1.48 for defense), speaks for a win for the league leaders.

URA vs Vipers: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

URA play Vipers in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The match date is 23 January 2026 at 18:00. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

URA: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match. Vipers: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

URA scores 0.90 and concedes 0.97 goals per match. Vipers scores 1.90 and concedes 0.48. League average: 2.09 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: URA 40%, Vipers 48%. Over 2.5: URA 27%, Vipers 41%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 35%.

xG, shots and style

Vipers has higher xG: 1.62 vs 1.56. URA: 11.0 shots per match, Vipers: 10.8.

Match halves

URA: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.40. Vipers: half-time lead 52%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

URA: 31-45+ (8 goals). Vipers: 31-45+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uganda Premier League: 2.09 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 35%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Vipers SC presents decidedly better form and statistics this season, occupying first place in the table with an impressive record of 8 wins, 3 draws, and 0 losses. The visiting team shows particular defensive solidity in away matches, conceding an average of just 0.4 goals per match and keeping a clean sheet in 60% of away games. URA, meanwhile, sits in 12th position in the table and presents poor form, losing 4 of the last 5 matches overall with a points balance of 0.6 PPG. The hosts have not kept a clean sheet in any home match this season, which, given Vipers' efficiency (1.4 goals on average away), puts them in a disadvantageous situation. The difference in quality between the two teams, confirmed by both table position and xG indicators (2.1 vs 1.91 for attack, 1.33 vs 1.48 for defense), speaks for a win for the league leaders.

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

52Possession (%)48
URAVipers
9Shots11
URAVipers
3Shots on target6
URAVipers
1.14xG1.42
URAVipers
8Corners5
URAVipers
50Dangerous attacks42
URAVipers
16Fouls16
URAVipers
0Cards0
URAVipers

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.9Goals scored / match1.9
URAVipers
0.97Goals conceded / match0.48
URAVipers
51%Average possession52%
URAVipers
4.37Shots on target / match4.34
URAVipers

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11Shots per match10.83
URAVipers
4.37Shots on target4.34
URAVipers
8.2%Shot conversion17.5%
URAVipers
51%Possession52%
URAVipers
1.56xG for1.62
URAVipers
1.38xG against1.09
URAVipers

Shooting quality

URA: BalancedVipers: Efficient finishing
URAVipers
Accuracy (shots on target)40%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.210.44

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Vipers is 57% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - URA · 2.2 pts / match - Vipers

URA
DDDDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
17% W53% R30% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-16-9
1.03 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-4-0
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-8-3
Last 5 at home
1-4-0
WDDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.62Opponent xG: 1.01BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Vipers
DDWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
69% W31% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
20-9-0
2.38 pts / match · goal difference +41
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
9-5-0
Last 5 away
3-2-0
DWDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 0.99BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Vipers is 111% better for: goals scored per match.

0.9 goals / match - URA · 1.9 goals / match - Vipers

Vipers is 102% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.97 goals / match - URA · 0.48 goals / match - Vipers

URA scoring profile: more difficult

URA scores in 50% of matches (15 of 30 matches), while Vipers keeps a clean sheet in 52% (15 of 29 matches).

Vipers scoring profile: very strong

Vipers scores in 93% of matches (27 of 29 matches), while URA keeps a clean sheet in 40% (12 of 30 matches).

27Goals scored (season)55
URAVipers
29Goals conceded (season)14
URAVipers
1.87Average goals in match2.38
URAVipers
7Goals scored (last 5)8
URAVipers
4Goals conceded (last 5)2
URAVipers

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal93%
URAVipers
17%2 goals55%
URAVipers
10%3 goals28%
URAVipers
3%4 goals10%
URAVipers

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal48%
URAVipers
27%2 goals0%
URAVipers
10%3 goals0%
URAVipers
0%4 goals0%
URAVipers

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time3%
URAVipers
7%BTTS in both halves0%
URAVipers
13%Scored in both halves34%
URAVipers

BTTS and goal count

20%Min. 3 goals and BTTS24%
URAVipers
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
URAVipers
60%BTTS - last 540%
URAVipers

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

57%Min. 1 goal before half-time62%
URAVipers
30%Min. 2 goals before half-time21%
URAVipers
7%Min. 3 goals before half-time14%
URAVipers

2nd half

60%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
URAVipers
17%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
URAVipers
3%Min. 3 goals after half-time10%
URAVipers

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Vipers is 65% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.17 pts / match - URA · 1.93 pts / match - Vipers

URA - half-time state
20% leading57% draw23% trailing
Vipers - half-time state
52% leading38% draw10% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.17Points per match (1st half)1.93
URAVipers
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.86
URAVipers
0.43Goals conceded (1st half)0.14
URAVipers
0.93Average goals (1st half)1
URAVipers
60%Clean sheet before half-time86%
URAVipers
67%No goal before half-time48%
URAVipers

After half-time (2nd half)

1.17Points per match (2nd half)2
URAVipers
0.4Goals scored (2nd half)1
URAVipers
0.53Goals conceded (2nd half)0.34
URAVipers
0.93Average goals (2nd half)1.34
URAVipers
60%Clean sheet after half-time66%
URAVipers
70%No goal after half-time28%
URAVipers

URA - second-half results

23% W47% R30% P
35
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
35
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.17
PPG before half-time
Lead holding85%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 17%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Vipers - second-half results

55% W34% R10% P
56
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+21
Goal difference (1st half)
58
Second-half points
+19
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.93
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 52% of matches and wins 69%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

URA - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.20
Goals scored / match1.00.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.40.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference+30
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Vipers - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.003.00
Goals scored / match0.41.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.0
Average goals in match0.81.2
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%100%
No goal80%0%
Goal difference0+6
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

URA
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
6
5
16-30
8
4
31-45
2
8
46-60
6
4
61-75
4
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Vipers
ScoredConceded
9
0
0-15
4
1
16-30
13
3
31-45
11
4
46-60
11
3
61-75
7
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.13
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.7 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
44%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-6%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
47%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

URA

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.66
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.41
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
117%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

Vipers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.53
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.89
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.61
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
229%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
38%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).

Teams vs league

URALigaVipers
Average goals in match 1.872.09 2.38
Both teams scored 40%38% 48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 27%35% 41%
Clean sheets 40%39% 52%
Goal before half-time 57%59% 62%
Goal after half-time 60%62% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.09
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.26
Home goals / match
0.83
Away goals / match
+52%
Home attack advantage
+34%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: URA 0 - 1 - 0 Vipers. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of URA vs Vipers?

The Uganda Premier League match finished URA 0:2 Vipers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before URA vs Vipers?

URA score 0.90 goals per game on average and Vipers 1.90. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 40% of URA's matches and 48% of Vipers's.

What form are URA and Vipers in?

Over the last 5 games URA have a 1-4-0 record (1.40 points per game) and Vipers 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for URA vs Vipers?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for URA vs Vipers: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.