Urawa Reds vs Kawasaki Frontale: match statistics
Urawa Reds vs Kawasaki Frontale: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Urawa Reds played Kawasaki Frontale in J1 League (Japan). The match was played on 6 December 2025. Final score: 4:0.
Current form
Urawa Reds: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Kawasaki Frontale: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Urawa Reds scores 1.11 and concedes 1.05 goals per match. Kawasaki Frontale scores 1.81 and concedes 1.43. League average: 2.39 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Urawa Reds 46%, Kawasaki Frontale 68%. Over 2.5: Urawa Reds 41%, Kawasaki Frontale 62%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 44%.
xG, shots and style
Kawasaki Frontale has higher xG: 1.54 vs 1.35. Urawa Reds: 12.1 shots per match, Kawasaki Frontale: 13.5.
Match halves
Urawa Reds: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.57. Kawasaki Frontale: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
Urawa Reds: 31-45+ (10 goals). Kawasaki Frontale: 76-90+ (21 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
J1 League: 2.39 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 44%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-1. Average goals 3.67, BTTS 100%.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Urawa Reds | Kawasaki Frontale | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Urawa Reds is 40% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Urawa Reds · 1 pts / match - Kawasaki Frontale
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Kawasaki Frontale is 63% better for: goals scored per match.
1.11 goals / match - Urawa Reds · 1.81 goals / match - Kawasaki Frontale
Urawa Reds is 36% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.05 goals / match - Urawa Reds · 1.43 goals / match - Kawasaki Frontale
Urawa Reds scores in 65% of matches (24 of 37 matches), while Kawasaki Frontale keeps a clean sheet in 22% (8 of 37 matches).
Kawasaki Frontale scores in 84% of matches (31 of 37 matches), while Urawa Reds keeps a clean sheet in 35% (13 of 37 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Urawa Reds
Over / Under - Kawasaki Frontale
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Urawa Reds is 26% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.46 pts / match - Urawa Reds · 1.16 pts / match - Kawasaki Frontale
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Urawa Reds - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Kawasaki Frontale - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -5 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (21 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (16). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Urawa Reds
Kawasaki Frontale
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J1 League).
Teams vs league
| Urawa Reds | Liga | Kawasaki Frontale | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.16 | 2.39 | ▲ 3.24 |
| Both teams scored | • 46% | 46% | ▲ 68% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 41% | 44% | ▲ 62% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 35% | 31% | ▼ 22% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 57% | 60% | ▲ 68% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 68% | 75% | ▲ 78% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Urawa Reds 0 - 2 - 1 Kawasaki Frontale. Average goals 3.67, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Urawa Reds vs Kawasaki Frontale?
The J1 League match finished Urawa Reds 4:0 Kawasaki Frontale. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Urawa Reds and Kawasaki Frontale?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Urawa Reds won 0, Kawasaki Frontale won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Urawa Reds vs Kawasaki Frontale?
Urawa Reds score 1.11 goals per game on average and Kawasaki Frontale 1.81. The J1 League average is 2.39 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 46% of Urawa Reds's matches and 68% of Kawasaki Frontale's.
What form are Urawa Reds and Kawasaki Frontale in?
Over the last 5 games Urawa Reds have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Kawasaki Frontale 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Urawa Reds vs Kawasaki Frontale?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.