Match suspended or postponed
The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context.
US Biskra vs MC Alger: match statistics
US Biskra vs MC Alger: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
US Biskra play MC Alger in Ligue 1 (Algeria). The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context. Venue: Complexe Sportif d'El Alia.
Current form
US Biskra: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match. MC Alger: 2-1-0, 2.33 points/match.
Goal statistics
US Biskra scores 0.40 and concedes 1.60 goals per match. MC Alger scores 1.33 and concedes 0.33. League average: 2.08 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: US Biskra 20%, MC Alger 33%. Over 2.5: US Biskra 40%, MC Alger 0%. League level: BTTS 28%, Over 2.5 25%.
xG, shots and style
MC Alger has higher xG: 1.81 vs 0.80. US Biskra: 4.2 shots per match, MC Alger: 12.7.
Match halves
US Biskra: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.00. MC Alger: half-time lead 67%, second-half goals 0.67.
Goals by minute
US Biskra: 16-30 (1 goals). MC Alger: 0-15 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ligue 1: 2.08 goals per match, BTTS 28%, Over 2.5 25%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| US Biskra | MC Alger | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 19% | 55% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.19 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.50 | 0.19 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
MC Alger is 483% better for: last-5 form.
0.4 pts / match - US Biskra · 2.33 pts / match - MC Alger
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
MC Alger is 233% better for: goals scored per match.
0.4 goals / match - US Biskra · 1.33 goals / match - MC Alger
MC Alger is 385% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.6 goals / match - US Biskra · 0.33 goals / match - MC Alger
US Biskra scores in 20% of matches (1 of 5 matches), while MC Alger keeps a clean sheet in 67% (2 of 3 matches).
MC Alger scores in 100% of matches (3 of 3 matches), while US Biskra keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - US Biskra
Over / Under - MC Alger
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
MC Alger is 94% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.2 pts / match - US Biskra · 2.33 pts / match - MC Alger
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
US Biskra - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
MC Alger - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 67% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 100% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.33 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.3 |
| Average goals in match | 0.7 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 67% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 67% |
| No goal | 33% | 33% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
US Biskra
MC Alger
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligue 1).
Teams vs league
| US Biskra | Liga | MC Alger | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.00 | 2.08 | ▼ 1.67 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 20% | 28% | ▲ 33% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 40% | 25% | ▼ 0% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 42% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 40% | 50% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 80% | 78% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.