Algeria - Ligue 1Data current as of 06 September 2026

USM Khenchela vs El Bayadh: match statistics

USM Khenchela crest
USM Khenchela
2 : 1half-time 1:0
El Bayadh crest
El Bayadh

USM Khenchela vs El Bayadh: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

USM Khenchela played El Bayadh in Ligue 1 (Algeria). The match was played on 8 May 2026. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

USM Khenchela: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. El Bayadh: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

USM Khenchela scores 1.15 and concedes 1.27 goals per match. El Bayadh scores 0.52 and concedes 1.33. League average: 2.22 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: USM Khenchela 54%, El Bayadh 37%. Over 2.5: USM Khenchela 46%, El Bayadh 22%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 37%.

xG, shots and style

El Bayadh has higher xG: 1.40 vs 1.38. USM Khenchela: 10.3 shots per match, El Bayadh: 10.6.

Match halves

USM Khenchela: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.54. El Bayadh: half-time lead 4%, second-half goals 0.41.

Goals by minute

USM Khenchela: 31-45+ (10 goals). El Bayadh: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ligue 1: 2.22 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 37%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

USM Khenchela holds a clear advantage in chance creation and finishing: the home side average 11.17 shots per match and 3.67 on target at home, converting to 1.17 goals per game, while El Bayadh away average 7.54 shots and only 0.31 goals per match. The quality of those chances is confirmed by xG — USM average 1.50 xG at home versus 1.13 xG for El Bayadh on the road, and conversion rates are 10% versus 4%, which explains the difference in efficiency. Defensively the hosts concede just 0.67 goals per home match and keep 42% clean sheets, whereas the visitors concede 1.54 goals away and record only 15% clean sheets; a goal difference of +6 versus -16 in favor of the hosts completes the picture. In the last 5 matches USM scored 6 goals and averaged 1.2 points per game, while El Bayadh scored 3 goals, failed to win any of their last 5 and average only 0.4 points per game in that period. Considering these specific figures and the high rate of opponent shutouts away (69% of away matches), I predict a home win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I project a 'No' scenario (both teams not to score) because the strongest signal is the visitors' very low finishing: El Bayadh average only 0.31 goals per match and failed to score in 69% of their games. USM Khenchela concedes 1.14 goals per match but posts xG_for 1.66 versus xG_against_away 1.48 (1.66 vs 1.48), while El Bayadh has xG_for 1.13 against xG_against_home 1.19 — expected chances for the visitors (~1.13) do not translate into the actual 0.31 goals. In the last 5 matches El Bayadh scored 0.6 goals on average and USM Khenchela 1.2; the visitors simultaneously conceded 1.8 goals on average across five matches, which confirms their poor finishing. The difference in chance creation is clear: the home side produce 13.5 shots (4.93 on target) versus 7.54 shots (3.77 on target) for the visitors, with conversion rates of 5% vs 4%, so hosts will attempt more but visitors are unlikely to respond. Additionally, seasonal BTTS percentages are 43% for USM and 31% for El Bayadh, both below the league average 47%, which strengthens the 'No' signal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The xG and opponent-defense model projects 1.57 goals for USM Khenchela and 1.16 for El Bayadh, totaling 2.73 goals. The home side posts xG 1.66 with an average of 13.5 shots and 4.93 on target, while the visitors have xG 1.13 with 7.54 shots and 3.77 on target, indicating both teams create chances. Seasonally 64% of home matches and 62% of away matches finish Over 1.5 goals, whereas Over 2.5 occurs only in 21–23% of cases, so the 2.5 line is less likely. Additionally, the hosts have an 80% Over 2.5 rate in their last 5 fixtures (6 goals scored and 8 conceded), which partially boosts the probability of at least two goals, though the sample is small. Therefore I recommend a play on Over 1.5, as the expected 2.73 goals and seasonal 64%/62% rates for Over 1.5 provide a clear edge for that scenario.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Statistical analysis indicates a home advantage in chance creation: home xG is 1.66 versus 1.13 for the away side, average shots 13.5 vs 7.54 and season first-half goal average 0.71 vs 0.31, giving USM Khenchela greater chances to win the match. However, draws dominate at half-time — the home team has been drawing at the break in 57% of their matches (drawingAtHTPercentage_home = 57%), while El Bayadh has never led at half-time this season (leadingAtHTPercentage_away = 0%), hence a high probability of a draw after 45 minutes. The last five fixtures show an improvement for the hosts: in their last 5 matches the home side led at half-time in 60% of cases and averaged 1.0 first-half goals versus 0.4 for the visitors, with form lwwll and a 40% win rate in the last five, whereas El Bayadh have a 0% win rate in their last five. The decisive phase should be the second half — the hosts have 86% of matches with at least one goal after the break versus 62% for the away team (over05_2hg_percentage_home = 86% vs 62%) and have scored most goals in minutes 76–90 (4 vs 1), which supports a turnaround from a half-time draw in their favor. On this basis the safest scenario is a draw at half-time and a USM Khenchela victory by full-time (X/1), hence I assign the highest weight to this outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh
9Shots8
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh
5Shots on target4
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh
1.4xG1.28
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh
7Corners4
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh
65Dangerous attacks65
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh
-1Fouls-1
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh
2Cards3
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh
1.15Goals scored / match0.52
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh
1.27Goals conceded / match1.33
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh
50%Average possession47%
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh
3.77Shots on target / match4.37
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.27Shots per match10.63
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh
3.77Shots on target4.37
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh
11.2%Shot conversion4.9%
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh
50%Possession47%
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh
1.38xG for1.4
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh
1.47xG against1.33
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh

Shooting quality

USM Khenchela: BalancedEl Bayadh: Balanced
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh
Accuracy (shots on target)37%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.12

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

USM Khenchela is 200% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - USM Khenchela · 0.4 pts / match - El Bayadh

USM Khenchela
LWWLL
Season result split
35% W27% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-7-10
1.31 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-5-2
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DDLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.23Opponent xG: 1.59BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%
El Bayadh
DLDLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
7% W33% R59% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-9-16
0.56 pts / match · goal difference -22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-4-9
Last 5 away
0-2-3
DDLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.07Opponent xG: 1.16BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

USM Khenchela is 121% better for: goals scored per match.

1.15 goals / match - USM Khenchela · 0.52 goals / match - El Bayadh

USM Khenchela is 5% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.27 goals / match - USM Khenchela · 1.33 goals / match - El Bayadh

USM Khenchela scoring profile: very strong

USM Khenchela scores in 73% of matches (19 of 26 matches), while El Bayadh keeps a clean sheet in 19% (5 of 27 matches).

El Bayadh scoring profile: mixed

El Bayadh scores in 44% of matches (12 of 27 matches), while USM Khenchela keeps a clean sheet in 23% (6 of 26 matches).

30Goals scored (season)14
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh
33Goals conceded (season)36
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh
2.42Average goals in match1.85
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh
6Goals scored (last 5)3
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh
8Goals conceded (last 5)9
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal44%
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh
31%2 goals7%
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh
12%3 goals0%
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh
0%4 goals0%
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh

How often they concede at least...

77%1 goal81%
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh
35%2 goals41%
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh
12%3 goals7%
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh
4%4 goals4%
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

47%
League average

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time7%
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh
4%BTTS in both halves4%
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh
23%Scored in both halves7%
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh

BTTS and goal count

35%Min. 3 goals and BTTS19%
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh
12%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh
40%BTTS - last 540%
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

73%Min. 1 goal before half-time59%
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh
35%Min. 2 goals before half-time15%
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time4%
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time74%
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh
42%Min. 2 goals after half-time26%
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh
4%Min. 3 goals after half-time4%
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

USM Khenchela is 168% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.58 pts / match - USM Khenchela · 0.59 pts / match - El Bayadh

USM Khenchela - half-time state
38% leading42% draw19% trailing
El Bayadh - half-time state
4% leading48% draw48% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.58Points per match (1st half)0.59
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh
0.62Goals scored (1st half)0.11
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh
0.54Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh
1.15Average goals (1st half)0.78
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh
65%Clean sheet before half-time44%
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh
42%No goal before half-time89%
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh

After half-time (2nd half)

1.04Points per match (2nd half)1
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh
0.54Goals scored (2nd half)0.41
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh
0.73Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh
1.27Average goals (2nd half)1.07
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh
42%Clean sheet after half-time44%
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh
62%No goal after half-time59%
USM KhenchelaEl Bayadh

USM Khenchela - second-half results

19% W46% R35% P
41
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.58
PPG before half-time
Lead holding92%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 35%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

El Bayadh - second-half results

19% W44% R37% P
16
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-15
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.59
PPG before half-time
Lead holding175%

Leads at half-time in 4% of matches and wins 7%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

USM Khenchela - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.800.80
Goals scored / match1.00.2
Goals conceded / match0.61.0
Average goals in match1.61.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference+2-4
Half-time: 60% leading - 0% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5
El Bayadh - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.60
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match1.00.8
Average goals in match1.41.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-3-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

USM Khenchela
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
5
2
16-30
10
8
31-45
5
5
46-60
5
3
61-75
4
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

El Bayadh
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
1
8
16-30
1
6
31-45
3
5
46-60
3
2
61-75
5
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.13
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
46%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+41%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
32%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
15%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

USM Khenchela

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
140%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

El Bayadh

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.88
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.88
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
0.00
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
57%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
102%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.16
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
36% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
36%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligue 1).

Teams vs league

USM KhenchelaLigaEl Bayadh
Average goals in match 2.422.22 1.85
Both teams scored 54%47% 37%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 46%37% 22%
Clean sheets 23%31% 19%
Goal before half-time 73%63% 59%
Goal after half-time 73%73% 74%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.22
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
37%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.31
Home goals / match
0.91
Away goals / match
+44%
Home attack advantage
+31%
Home defence advantage
+28%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
63%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. USM KhenchelaSubstitutionOn: Ahmida ZenasniOff: Aymen Abdeldjalil Bendaoud
  2. El BayadhYellow cardDiaa Eddine Benyahia
  3. El BayadhSubstitutionOn: Ilyes AttallahOff: Adel Ghanem
  4. USM KhenchelaSubstitutionOn: Hamid DjaouchiOff: Mohamed Islam Bakir
  5. El BayadhYellow cardAbdelilah Berkat
  6. USM KhenchelaYellow cardAhmida Zenasni
  7. El BayadhSubstitutionOn: Mortada Khir Eddine KenicheOff: Ahmed Mahboub
  8. USM KhenchelaSubstitutionOn: Mohamed Abdelali GuemroudOff: Abdelhak Askar
  9. USM KhenchelaSubstitutionOn: Abdelhakim SameurOff: Zin Eddine Meddour
  10. USM KhenchelaYellow cardEdlin Randy Essang Matouti

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: USM Khenchela 1 - 0 - 0 El Bayadh. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of USM Khenchela vs El Bayadh?

The Ligue 1 match finished USM Khenchela 2:1 El Bayadh. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before USM Khenchela vs El Bayadh?

USM Khenchela score 1.15 goals per game on average and El Bayadh 0.52. The Ligue 1 average is 2.22 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 37% of games. Both teams score in 54% of USM Khenchela's matches and 37% of El Bayadh's.

What form are USM Khenchela and El Bayadh in?

Over the last 5 games USM Khenchela have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and El Bayadh 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for USM Khenchela vs El Bayadh?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.