UTC Cajamarca vs Sport Boys: match statistics
UTC Cajamarca vs Sport Boys: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
UTC Cajamarca played Sport Boys in Primera División (Peru). The match was played on 23 May 2026. Venue: Estadio Héroes de San Ramón. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
UTC Cajamarca: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match. Sport Boys: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
UTC Cajamarca scores 1.27 and concedes 1.60 goals per match. Sport Boys scores 0.93 and concedes 1.27. League average: 2.64 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: UTC Cajamarca 60%, Sport Boys 40%. Over 2.5: UTC Cajamarca 53%, Sport Boys 40%. League level: BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 51%.
xG, shots and style
Sport Boys has higher xG: 1.40 vs 1.35. UTC Cajamarca: 12.1 shots per match, Sport Boys: 13.7.
Match halves
UTC Cajamarca: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 0.87. Sport Boys: half-time lead 7%, second-half goals 0.73.
Goals by minute
UTC Cajamarca: 76-90+ (10 goals). Sport Boys: 46-60 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Primera División: 2.64 goals per match, BTTS 56%, Over 2.5 51%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Season data show UTC create more chances at home — averaging 1.29 goals scored, 1.14 conceded, xG 1.32 vs xG against 1.17 and 4.29 shots on target per match with a conversion rate of 11%. However, in the last 5 matches the hosts have conceded as many as 11 goals, scored 5 and have a record of 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses (PPG 0.2), indicating serious defensive issues. Sport Boys away average 0.86 scored and 2.00 conceded, with xG 1.17 vs xG against 1.52 and season FTS 43%, but in the last 5 matches they scored 5 and conceded only 4, with a record of 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss (PPG 1.6). The form gap is decisive: UTC PPG 0.2 vs Sport Boys 1.6 and 11 goals conceded by the hosts versus 4 for the visitors in the last five fixtures suggest higher chances for an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I predict BTTS - Yes with a 65% probability: UTC have xG_for 1.60, while Sport Boys concede around 1.52 xG seasonally and concede on average 2.00 goals per match, which increases the chance of the hosts scoring. Additionally, Sport Boys have generated xG_for 1.78 in their last 5 matches and scored 5 goals, whereas UTC conceded 11 goals in those 5 games (2.2 per match), suggesting the hosts can also be breached. There are counter-signals: seasonally UTC have 63% clean sheets and the hosts’ seasonal BTTS is only 38%, and Sport Boys fail to score in 43% of matches, which weakens the both-teams-to-score scenario. However, considering the importance of recent form and xG values, plus the league BTTS rate at 56% and that Sport Boys’ matches finish over 2.5 goals in 57% of cases, the 'Yes' tip appears better justified.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG and defensive analysis yields a combined expected goal total of approximately 2.66: the home side has an attacking xG of 1.60 and the opponent concedes on average xG 1.52, translating to ~1.56 expected home goals; the visitors have attacking xG 1.17 while the hosts concede xG 1.02, giving ~1.10 expected away goals. Using a Poisson distribution with mean 2.66, the probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5) is about 74%, while Over 2.5 is ~50% and Over 3.5 ~28%. Seasonal rates support this projection: Over 0.5 occurs for UTC in 75% of matches and for Sport Boys in 100%, and Over 1.5 is 50% for the hosts and 57% for the visitors; the league average is 2.67 goals/match. A counterpoint is the hosts’ defensive form over the last 5 matches — UTC conceded 11 goals (2.2 per match) versus 4 conceded by Sport Boys (0.8 per match) — which introduces some risk, but the combined xG and frequent overs for the visitors keep the goals direction favored. As a result, the strongest and most value-driven signal from the data is to back Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
UTC Cajamarca has a statistical edge: at home they average 1.63 points per match and generate 1.60 xG, whereas Sport Boys average 0.43 points away and 1.17 xG. At Half-Time the most likely outcome is a draw — the home side were level at the break in 63% of matches, the visitors were trailing at the break in 71% of their games, and the hosts lead at the break in only 13% of cases. The hosts concede on average 0.63 goals per match versus 2.00 conceded by the away side and keep a clean sheet at home in 63% of fixtures, suggesting a low number of first-half goals but a defensive advantage for the home team. Second-half metrics also favour UTC — they win 63% of second halves and average 0.88 goals after the break, so they are more likely to determine the result in the second half. Therefore the most reliable scenario appears to be a draw at Half-Time and a home win at Full-Time (X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| UTC Cajamarca | Sport Boys | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.10 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.23 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Sport Boys is 700% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / match - UTC Cajamarca · 1.6 pts / match - Sport Boys
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
UTC Cajamarca is 37% better for: goals scored per match.
1.27 goals / match - UTC Cajamarca · 0.93 goals / match - Sport Boys
Sport Boys is 26% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.6 goals / match - UTC Cajamarca · 1.27 goals / match - Sport Boys
UTC Cajamarca scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while Sport Boys keeps a clean sheet in 40% (6 of 15 matches).
Sport Boys scores in 67% of matches (10 of 15 matches), while UTC Cajamarca keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 15 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - UTC Cajamarca
Over / Under - Sport Boys
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
UTC Cajamarca is 69% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.13 pts / match - UTC Cajamarca · 0.67 pts / match - Sport Boys
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
UTC Cajamarca - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Sport Boys - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 7% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 1.8 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 0% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 100% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
UTC Cajamarca
Sport Boys
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Primera División).
Teams vs league
| UTC Cajamarca | Liga | Sport Boys | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.87 | 2.64 | ▼ 2.20 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 60% | 56% | ▼ 40% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 53% | 51% | ▼ 40% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 13% | 25% | ▲ 40% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 67% | 65% | ▼ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 80% | ▼ 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): UTC Cajamarca 0 - 2 - 0 Sport Boys. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of UTC Cajamarca vs Sport Boys?
The Primera División match finished UTC Cajamarca 0:0 Sport Boys. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between UTC Cajamarca and Sport Boys?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches UTC Cajamarca won 0, Sport Boys won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before UTC Cajamarca vs Sport Boys?
UTC Cajamarca score 1.27 goals per game on average and Sport Boys 0.93. The Primera División average is 2.64 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 60% of UTC Cajamarca's matches and 40% of Sport Boys's.
What form are UTC Cajamarca and Sport Boys in?
Over the last 5 games UTC Cajamarca have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Sport Boys 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for UTC Cajamarca vs Sport Boys?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


