Netherlands - Eerste DivisieStadion GalgenwaardData current as of 15 October 2026

Utrecht II vs Vitesse: match statistics

Utrecht II crest
Utrecht II
1 : 3half-time 1:1
Vitesse crest
Vitesse

Utrecht II vs Vitesse: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Utrecht II played Vitesse in Eerste Divisie (Netherlands). The match was played on 17 August 2026. Venue: Stadion Galgenwaard. Final score: 1:3.

Current form

Utrecht II: 0-0-1, 0.00 points/match. Vitesse: 0-1-0, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Utrecht II scores 1.00 and concedes 2.00 goals per match. Vitesse scores 1.00 and concedes 1.00. League average: 3.24 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Utrecht II 100%, Vitesse 100%. Over 2.5: Utrecht II 100%, Vitesse 0%. League level: BTTS 76%, Over 2.5 65%.

xG, shots and style

Utrecht II has higher xG: 1.50 vs 1.36. Utrecht II: 14.0 shots per match, Vitesse: 11.0.

Match halves

Utrecht II: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.00. Vitesse: half-time lead 100%, second-half goals 0.00.

Goals by minute

Utrecht II: 0-15 (1 goals). Vitesse: 31-45+ (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Eerste Divisie: 3.24 goals per match, BTTS 76%, Over 2.5 65%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Vitesse have a slight edge in recent form, collecting 8 points from their last five matches compared with 7 for Utrecht II. The visitors have also been significantly more clinical, scoring 11 goals during this period to the hosts’ 7, while conceding just 4 compared with Utrecht II’s 6. Utrecht II lost their only league match so far this season 1:2, whereas Vitesse began their campaign with a 1:1 draw and remain unbeaten. However, the gap is narrow, as Vitesse have recorded 2 draws in their last 5 matches, making a stalemate a realistic outcome. Nevertheless, their superior recent goal difference and more solid defensive record support a narrow away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Recent form clearly supports goals at both ends: Utrecht II are averaging 1.4 goals, while Vitesse are scoring as many as 2.2 goals in their last 5 matches. The hosts have conceded 1.2 goals per game during this period, while their average xG against is a high 1.55, giving Vitesse solid grounds to find the net. Utrecht II should also create chances, as they generate 1.56 xG, while Vitesse allow opponents 1.41 xG and have conceded 4 goals in their last five appearances. BTTS in the last five matches stands at 40% for Utrecht II and 60% for Vitesse, but the league average of 80% and the combined attacking quality of both teams shift the assessment towards a scenario in which both teams score. The “Yes” pick is not without risk due to the limited seasonal data sample, but the current goal-scoring averages and xG provide a stronger signal.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The latest form of both teams points to a goal-filled match: Utrecht II have averaged 1.4 goals over their last 5 matches, while Vitesse have averaged as many as 2.2. Vitesse have also maintained good defensive organization, conceding just 0.8 goals per game, while Utrecht II create chances worth an average of 1.56 xG. The hosts are less secure defensively, with their average xG conceded standing at 1.55 over the last 5 matches and as high as 1.82 in home games, which favors an away goal. At least 3 goals were scored in 60% of the last five matches played by each team, although the Over 2.5 line remains more balanced due to Vitesse’s defensive strength. The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals, as the projected total of 3.00 goals provides a clear margin above this line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario points to Vitesse leading at the break and maintaining that advantage until the end of the match. In their last five matches, Vitesse were ahead at half-time in 80% of cases, scoring an average of 1.2 goals before the break and conceding none during that period. Over the same span, Utrecht II were trailing at half-time in 40% of their matches, with a first-half average of 0.8 goals scored and 0.8 conceded. The overall form picture also favours the visitors: Vitesse average 2.2 goals scored and 0.8 conceded per match, while Utrecht II record 1.4 and 1.2 respectively. Seasonal data for this fixture are very limited, but Vitesse’s clear advantage in their last five outings, particularly before half-time, makes the 2/2 HT/FT outcome the most likely.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

37Possession (%)63
Utrecht IIVitesse
12Shots19
Utrecht IIVitesse
3Shots on target7
Utrecht IIVitesse
1.21xG2.11
Utrecht IIVitesse
3Corners3
Utrecht IIVitesse
33Dangerous attacks59
Utrecht IIVitesse
15Fouls7
Utrecht IIVitesse
2Cards2
Utrecht IIVitesse

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1Goals scored / match1
Utrecht IIVitesse
2Goals conceded / match1
Utrecht IIVitesse
43%Average possession42%
Utrecht IIVitesse
3Shots on target / match4
Utrecht IIVitesse

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14Shots per match11
Utrecht IIVitesse
3Shots on target4
Utrecht IIVitesse
7.1%Shot conversion9.1%
Utrecht IIVitesse
43%Possession42%
Utrecht IIVitesse
1.5xG for1.36
Utrecht IIVitesse
1.54xG against1.82
Utrecht IIVitesse

Shooting quality

Utrecht II: AttackingVitesse: Balanced
Utrecht IIVitesse
Accuracy (shots on target)21%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.25

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Utrecht II
L
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W0% D100% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-0-1
0.00 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-1
0.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 at home
0-0-0
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
Vitesse
D
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W100% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-0
1.00 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-0
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-0
Last 5 away
0-0-0
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.36Opponent xG: 1.82BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 0%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Vitesse is 100% better for: goals conceded per match.

2 goals / match - Utrecht II · 1 goals / match - Vitesse

Utrecht II scoring profile: very strong

Utrecht II scores in 100% of matches (1 of 1 matches), while Vitesse keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 matches).

Vitesse scoring profile: very strong

Vitesse scores in 100% of matches (1 of 1 matches), while Utrecht II keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 matches).

1Goals scored (season)1
Utrecht IIVitesse
2Goals conceded (season)1
Utrecht IIVitesse
3Average goals in match2
Utrecht IIVitesse
1Goals scored (last 5)1
Utrecht IIVitesse
2Goals conceded (last 5)1
Utrecht IIVitesse

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
Utrecht IIVitesse
0%2 goals0%
Utrecht IIVitesse
0%3 goals0%
Utrecht IIVitesse
0%4 goals0%
Utrecht IIVitesse

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal100%
Utrecht IIVitesse
100%2 goals0%
Utrecht IIVitesse
0%3 goals0%
Utrecht IIVitesse
0%4 goals0%
Utrecht IIVitesse

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

76%
League average

Goal patterns

100%BTTS at half-time0%
Utrecht IIVitesse
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Utrecht IIVitesse
0%Scored in both halves0%
Utrecht IIVitesse

BTTS and goal count

100%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
Utrecht IIVitesse
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Utrecht IIVitesse
100%BTTS - last 5100%
Utrecht IIVitesse

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Utrecht IIVitesse
100%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
Utrecht IIVitesse
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Utrecht IIVitesse

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Utrecht IIVitesse
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time0%
Utrecht IIVitesse
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Utrecht IIVitesse

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Vitesse is 200% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Utrecht II · 3 pts / match - Vitesse

Utrecht II - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing
Vitesse - half-time state
100% leading0% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)3
Utrecht IIVitesse
1Goals scored (1st half)1
Utrecht IIVitesse
1Goals conceded (1st half)0
Utrecht IIVitesse
2Average goals (1st half)1
Utrecht IIVitesse
0%Clean sheet before half-time100%
Utrecht IIVitesse
0%No goal before half-time0%
Utrecht IIVitesse

After half-time (2nd half)

0Points per match (2nd half)0
Utrecht IIVitesse
0Goals scored (2nd half)0
Utrecht IIVitesse
1Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Utrecht IIVitesse
1Average goals (2nd half)1
Utrecht IIVitesse
0%Clean sheet after half-time0%
Utrecht IIVitesse
100%No goal after half-time100%
Utrecht IIVitesse

Utrecht II - second-half results

0% W0% D100% L
1
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
0
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Vitesse - second-half results

0% W0% D100% L
3
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
0
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
3.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 100% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+1.0

Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Utrecht II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.00
Goals scored / match1.00.0
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match2.01.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals100%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet0%0%
No goal0%100%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 100% - Half-time goals total: 1
Vitesse - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match3.000.00
Goals scored / match1.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.01.0
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%0%
No goal0%100%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Utrecht II
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Vitesse
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
77%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
100%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
0%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Utrecht II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.96
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.50
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.46
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
57%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
136%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-1.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 100% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Vitesse

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.46
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.46
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.36
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.82
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
68%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
57%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-1.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eerste Divisie).

Teams vs league

Utrecht IILigaVitesse
Average goals in match▼ 3.003.24▼ 2.00
Both teams scored▲ 100%76%▲ 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 100%65%▼ 0%
Clean sheets▼ 0%12%▼ 0%
Goal before half-time▲ 100%82%▲ 100%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%88%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.24
Average goals per match
76%
Both teams scored
65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
12%
Clean sheets
1.76
Home goals / match
1.47
Away goals / match
+20%
Home attack advantage
+16%
Home defence advantage
+18%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
29%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. VitesseYellow cardRicardo-Felipe Schwarz
  2. VitesseYellow cardChiel Olde Keizer
  3. Utrecht IISubstitutionOn: Nana Gyamfi-AmoahOff: Levi Rietveld
  4. VitesseGoalNaoufal BannisAssist: Marco Schikora
  5. Utrecht IIRed cardNoa Dundas
  6. VitesseSubstitutionOn: Joâo Arlete PintoOff: Naoufal Bannis

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Utrecht II 0 - 0 - 2 Vitesse. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FC Utrecht II
0 : 3
SBV Vitesse
SBV Vitesse
2 : 0
FC Utrecht II

FAQ

What was the result of Utrecht II vs Vitesse?

The Eerste Divisie match finished Utrecht II 1:3 Vitesse. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Utrecht II and Vitesse?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Utrecht II won 0, Vitesse won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Utrecht II vs Vitesse?

Utrecht II score 1.00 goals per game on average and Vitesse 1.00. The Eerste Divisie average is 3.24 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Utrecht II's matches and 100% of Vitesse's.

What form are Utrecht II and Vitesse in?

Over the last 5 games Utrecht II have a 0-0-1 record (0.00 points per game) and Vitesse 0-1-0 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Utrecht II vs Vitesse?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.