Utrecht vs Telstar: match statistics
Utrecht vs Telstar: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Utrecht played Telstar in Eredivisie (Netherlands). The match was played on 11 April 2026. Final score: 4:1.
Current form
Utrecht: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Telstar: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Utrecht scores 1.55 and concedes 1.21 goals per match. Telstar scores 1.31 and concedes 1.66. League average: 3.19 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Utrecht 62%, Telstar 62%. Over 2.5: Utrecht 48%, Telstar 55%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 62%.
xG, shots and style
Utrecht has higher xG: 1.59 vs 1.48. Utrecht: 14.7 shots per match, Telstar: 13.2.
Match halves
Utrecht: half-time lead 45%, second-half goals 0.83. Telstar: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.76.
Goals by minute
Utrecht: 31-45+ (11 goals). Telstar: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Eredivisie: 3.19 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 62%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Utrecht is the favorite in this matchup — at home they win 50% of matches, average 1.64 goals scored and only 0.86 conceded per game, with a home goal difference of +11. Telstar away averages 1.00 goals scored, concedes 1.50 and has a negative away goal difference of -7, additionally winning only 21% of away fixtures. The difference in quality of chances is confirmed by xG: Utrecht posts 1.68 xG at home versus Telstar’s 1.38 xG on the road, while xG against is 1.33 for Utrecht and 2.05 for Telstar, indicating greater vulnerability from the visitors. In the last 5 matches Utrecht recorded 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss (an average of 2 points per game), whereas Telstar has 2 wins and 3 losses (1.2 points per game); the visitors fail to score in 36% of away games, while the hosts keep a clean sheet in 29% of home matches. Considering superior shot efficiency (Utrecht averages 5.29 shots on target and 16.14 shots per game vs Telstar’s 4.36/12.57) and a defensive edge, I assign higher probability to the home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal indicators favor the BTTS variant: Utrecht has a seasonal BTTS of 73%, Telstar 50%, and the league average is 63%. In attack Utrecht generates xG 1.57 and averages 5.4 shots on target per match with a conversion rate of 12%, while Telstar concedes xG 2.05 and 4.36 shots on target, which increases the likelihood that the home side will score. Conversely, Telstar posts xG 1.38 and seasonally scores 1.0 goal per match with an 8% conversion, and Utrecht concedes 1.8 goals per match on the season, so the visitors have realistic, if limited, scoring opportunities. The last 5 matches send mixed signals: Utrecht has only 20% BTTS and concedes an average of 0.8 goals in the last 5 (4 conceded), while Telstar has 60% BTTS and concedes an average of 1.8 goals in the last 5 (9 conceded). Considering the strong seasonal 73% for the hosts and the league 63%, but adjusting for Utrecht’s low recent BTTS (20%) and Telstar’s lower conversion (8%), I tip BTTS - Yes with a probability of 62% versus 38%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I project 1.65 goals for Utrecht and 1.30 for Telstar (total 2.95), based on xG: Utrecht xG_for 1.57 vs Telstar 1.38 and shot conversion differential (12% vs 8%), which favors the hosts. I rate Over 1.5 at 96% — Utrecht have 93% of matches with over 1.5 goals this season, Telstar 79%, and the league averages 3.19 goals per game, so the lower line is highly likely. I assign 64% probability to Over 2.5 because Utrecht record 67% of games above 2.5 and Telstar 43%, and the combined xG of 2.95 leans toward over 2.5. Over 3.5 is less certain (about 37%) — Utrecht have 53% of such games but Telstar only 21%, so the higher line is not a strong signal. Additionally, the high percentage of both teams scoring (BTTS: Utrecht 73%, Telstar 50%) and only 7% clean sheets for the home side reinforce Over 1.5 as the best line to back.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Utrecht has a clear advantage in the first half: they led at the break in 40% of season matches, while Telstar did so in only 14%, and first-half goals average 0.8 for Utrecht versus 0.29 for Telstar. The home side also shows superior offensive metrics: xG 1.57 versus 1.38 for the visitors, on average 5.4 shots on target versus 4.36 and a higher conversion rate of 12% vs 8%, which increases the hosts’ chances to lead by half-time. In the last 5 matches Utrecht led at the break in 80% of games and had 60% wins in that period, with first-half goals averaging 1.4 for Utrecht versus 0.6 for Telstar, indicating strong starts. The risk of a turnaround is real — Utrecht concedes 1.07 goals on average after the break, Telstar scores 0.71 in the second half on average, and seasonally the hosts have BTTS in 73% of matches, so I also assign moderate chances to a draw or an away comeback after half-time. Based on this, my strongest scenario is 1/1 (30%), with alternatives X/1 (12%) and 2/2 (18%) arising from the combination of Utrecht’s strong start and vulnerability to conceding goals in the second half.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Utrecht | Telstar | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Utrecht is 11% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Utrecht · 1.8 pts / match - Telstar
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Utrecht is 18% better for: goals scored per match.
1.55 goals / match - Utrecht · 1.31 goals / match - Telstar
Utrecht is 37% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.21 goals / match - Utrecht · 1.66 goals / match - Telstar
Utrecht scores in 83% of matches (24 of 29 matches), while Telstar keeps a clean sheet in 14% (4 of 29 matches).
Telstar scores in 72% of matches (21 of 29 matches), while Utrecht keeps a clean sheet in 24% (7 of 29 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Utrecht
Over / Under - Telstar
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Utrecht is 39% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.59 pts / match - Utrecht · 1.14 pts / match - Telstar
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Utrecht - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 45% of matches and wins 38%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Telstar - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 21%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +6 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (11 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Utrecht
Telstar
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eredivisie).
Teams vs league
| Utrecht | Liga | Telstar | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.76 | 3.19 | ▼ 2.97 |
| Both teams scored | • 62% | 63% | • 62% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 48% | 62% | ▼ 55% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 24% | 20% | ▼ 14% |
| Goal before half-time | • 83% | 82% | ▼ 76% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 69% | 84% | ▲ 90% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Utrecht 0 - 1 - 0 Telstar. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Utrecht vs Telstar?
The Eredivisie match finished Utrecht 4:1 Telstar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Utrecht vs Telstar?
Utrecht score 1.55 goals per game on average and Telstar 1.31. The Eredivisie average is 3.19 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Utrecht's matches and 62% of Telstar's.
What form are Utrecht and Telstar in?
Over the last 5 games Utrecht have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Telstar 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Utrecht vs Telstar?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


