Morocco - Botola ProData current as of 03 November 2026

UTS Rabat vs Amal Tiznit: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

UTS Rabat vs Amal Tiznit: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

UTS Rabat play Amal Tiznit in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match date is 6 November 2026.

Current form

UTS Rabat: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Amal Tiznit: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

UTS Rabat scores 0.67 and concedes 0.67 goals per match. Amal Tiznit scores 1.00 and concedes 2.00. League average: 2.20 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: UTS Rabat 33%, Amal Tiznit 67%. Over 2.5: UTS Rabat 17%, Amal Tiznit 50%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 35%.

xG, shots and style

Amal Tiznit has higher xG: 1.37 vs 0.93. UTS Rabat: 5.8 shots per match, Amal Tiznit: 9.3.

Match halves

UTS Rabat: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.17. Amal Tiznit: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.67.

Goals by minute

UTS Rabat: 0-15 (1 goals). Amal Tiznit: 31-45+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Botola Pro: 2.20 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 35%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Before the match

1X2 odds

(-)
(-)
(-)

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
0.67Goals scored / match1
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
0.67Goals conceded / match2
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
44%Average possession49%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
2.33Shots on target / match4.67
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

5.83Shots per match9.33
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
2.33Shots on target4.67
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
11.4%Shot conversion10.7%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
44%Possession49%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
0.93xG for1.37
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
1.37xG against1.47
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit

Shooting quality

UTS Rabat: BalancedAmal Tiznit: Balanced
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
Accuracy (shots on target)40%50%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.160.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.21

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

UTS Rabat is 25% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - UTS Rabat · 0.8 pts / match - Amal Tiznit

UTS Rabat
WDLLD
Season result split
33% W33% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-2
1.33 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-1
Last 5 at home
1-1-1
WDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 0.96Opponent xG: 1.37BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 0%
Amal Tiznit
WLDLL
Season result split
17% W17% D67% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-4
0.67 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-0
Last 5 away
1-1-0
WD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.29Opponent xG: 1.41BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Amal Tiznit is 49% better for: goals scored per match.

0.67 goals / match - UTS Rabat · 1 goals / match - Amal Tiznit

UTS Rabat is 199% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.67 goals / match - UTS Rabat · 2 goals / match - Amal Tiznit

UTS Rabat scoring profile: strong

UTS Rabat scores in 50% of matches (3 of 6 matches), while Amal Tiznit keeps a clean sheet in 17% (1 of 6 matches).

Amal Tiznit scoring profile: very strong

Amal Tiznit scores in 83% of matches (5 of 6 matches), while UTS Rabat keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 matches).

4Goals scored (season)6
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
4Goals conceded (season)12
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
1.33Average goals in match3
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
2Goals scored (last 5)5
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
3Goals conceded (last 5)9
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal83%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
17%2 goals17%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
0%3 goals0%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
0%4 goals0%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal83%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
0%2 goals50%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
0%3 goals33%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
0%4 goals17%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

46%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time33%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
0%BTTS in both halves17%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
0%Scored in both halves17%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit

BTTS and goal count

17%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
20%BTTS - last 560%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit

2nd half

33%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
17%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

UTS Rabat is 166% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.33 pts / match - UTS Rabat · 0.5 pts / match - Amal Tiznit

UTS Rabat - half-time state
33% leading33% draw33% trailing
Amal Tiznit - half-time state
0% leading50% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.33Points per match (1st half)0.5
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.33
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)1
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
0.83Average goals (1st half)1.33
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
67%Clean sheet before half-time33%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
67%No goal before half-time67%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit

After half-time (2nd half)

0.83Points per match (2nd half)1
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
0.17Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
0.33Goals conceded (2nd half)1
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
0.5Average goals (2nd half)1.67
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
67%Clean sheet after half-time33%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit
83%No goal after half-time33%
UTS RabatAmal Tiznit

UTS Rabat - second-half results

0% W83% D17% L
8
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Amal Tiznit - second-half results

17% W50% D33% L
3
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.50
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

UTS Rabat - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match0.60.4
1 goal60%20%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
Amal Tiznit - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.20
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match1.00.8
Average goals in match1.21.6
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal80%20%
Goal difference-40
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

UTS Rabat
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
2
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Amal Tiznit
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
0
1
16-30
2
3
31-45
2
3
46-60
0
1
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.17
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
42%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

UTS Rabat

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.44
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.44
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.70
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
68%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
55%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 25% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Amal Tiznit

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.10
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.90
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.53
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
82%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
204%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).

Teams vs league

UTS RabatLigaAmal Tiznit
Average goals in match▼ 1.332.20▲ 3.00
Both teams scored▼ 33%46%▲ 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 17%35%▲ 50%
Clean sheets▼ 33%35%▼ 17%
Goal before half-time▲ 67%61%▲ 67%
Goal after half-time▼ 33%65%▲ 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.20
Average goals per match
46%
Both teams scored
35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
0.98
Home goals / match
1.22
Away goals / match
+-20%
Home attack advantage
+-24%
Home defence advantage
+-7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
22%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

FAQ

When do UTS Rabat and Amal Tiznit play?

UTS Rabat face Amal Tiznit on 6 November 2026 in Botola Pro. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What do the goal statistics show before UTS Rabat vs Amal Tiznit?

UTS Rabat score 0.67 goals per game on average and Amal Tiznit 1.00. The Botola Pro average is 2.20 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 33% of UTS Rabat's matches and 67% of Amal Tiznit's.

What form are UTS Rabat and Amal Tiznit in?

Over the last 5 games UTS Rabat have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Amal Tiznit 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for UTS Rabat vs Amal Tiznit?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for UTS Rabat vs Amal Tiznit: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.