UTS Rabat vs Maghreb Fès: match statistics
UTS Rabat vs Maghreb Fès: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
UTS Rabat played Maghreb Fès in Botola Pro (Morocco). The match was played on 10 May 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
UTS Rabat: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Maghreb Fès: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
UTS Rabat scores 1.05 and concedes 1.63 goals per match. Maghreb Fès scores 1.47 and concedes 0.53. League average: 2.17 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: UTS Rabat 74%, Maghreb Fès 37%. Over 2.5: UTS Rabat 32%, Maghreb Fès 26%. League level: BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 38%.
xG, shots and style
UTS Rabat has higher xG: 1.25 vs 1.15. UTS Rabat: 9.4 shots per match, Maghreb Fès: 8.7.
Match halves
UTS Rabat: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 0.58. Maghreb Fès: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 0.89.
Goals by minute
UTS Rabat: 76-90+ (6 goals). Maghreb Fès: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Botola Pro: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 38%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Maghreb Fès is the clear favorite on paper: they sit 2nd (10 wins, 8 draws, 1 loss, goal difference 28-10), while UTS Rabat are 15th (1 win, 10 draws, 8 losses, goals 20-31). In their last five matches Maghreb Fès are 3-1-1 averaging 2.0 points per game, whereas UTS Rabat are 1-1-3 averaging 0.8 points; the hosts conceded 12 goals in those five fixtures while the visitors conceded only 3. The defensive differential is decisive: UTS at home concede 1.7 goals per game with xG against 1.51 and 0% clean sheets, while Maghreb away concede 0.5 goals per game with xG against 1.20 and 50% clean sheets. Offensively both teams are similar — averaging 1.1 goals for the hosts and 1.1 for the visitors, attacking xG 1.13 vs 1.03, shots on target 3.4 vs 3.3 and a conversion rate of 13% — therefore the edge comes from superior defense and ball control (51% possession vs 44%). Considering the table position, better form (2.0 vs 0.8 points per game), markedly superior defensive record (0.5 vs 1.7 goals conceded) and an unbeaten away record (0% losses), I predict a Maghreb Fès victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
UTS Rabat averages 1.89 goals per match this season, while Maghreb Fès records 1.10, giving a clear attacking edge to the home side. The strongest signal for BTTS comes from the last 5 matches: UTS Rabat has 80% BTTS in the last 5 and concedes an average of 2.4 goals, whereas Maghreb Fès has 20% BTTS in the last 5 and concedes 0.6 goals. On a season basis the picture is mixed — season BTTS are 22% for UTS Rabat and 50% for Maghreb Fès, with the league BTTS rate at 50%, providing a moderate basis for both teams to score. Additionally, xG shows the home team creates 1.30 xG versus 1.03 xG for the visitors, average shots on target are 4.11 vs 3.30, and shooting accuracy is 20% vs 13%, which increases the realistic likelihood of goals from both sides. Considering the high 80% BTTS rate for the home team in the last 5 matches, the visitors’ season 50% BTTS and the home side’s creative advantage, I tip BTTS - Yes (65%) over No (35%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
After analyzing xG and seasonal metrics, I estimate expected goals of ~1.29 for UTS Rabat and ~1.22 for Maghreb Fès (total 2.51). Seasonally both teams have a high share of matches over 1.5 goals: UTS 67% and Maghreb 70% (avg 68.5%), which strengthens the Over 1.5 signal. Over 2.5 looks less convincing due to seasonal rates of 33% (UTS) and 20% (Maghreb), average 26.5%, although UTS’s last 5 matches show 60% of games >2.5, providing moderate short-term support. Additionally the home side has a high shot conversion of 20% with an average of 4.11 shots on target, increasing the likelihood of their goals, but a home clean sheet rate of 67% and low home BTTS of 22% limit the potential for a very high-scoring game. As a result I recommend betting Over 1.5 (strongest signal; est. 69%), while Over 2.5 (36%) and Over 3.5 (12%) appear less profitable.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Seasonal metrics favor the home side: UTS Rabat averages 1.89 goals per match versus Maghreb Fès’s 1.10, posts a higher xG (1.30 vs 1.03) and superior shot efficiency (conversion 20% vs 13%), and wins 67% of matches compared to the visitors’ 40%. The hosts led at the break in 5 matches (56% of cases) and score on average 0.67 goals by half-time versus 0.5 for the away team, increasing the likelihood of an HT lead for UTS. In the second half the home team averages 1.22 goals and concedes 0.33, with as many as 7 of their goals occurring in minutes 76–90 versus 1 away goal in that phase, indicating an ability to maintain or extend a lead. Although the visitors are in better recent form over the last 5 matches (60% wins vs the home side’s 20%), the seasonal advantage in xG and shot efficiency supports converting an HT lead into a Full-Time win for the hosts. Therefore I tip 1/1 as the strongest signal with a probability of 42%, with a moderate probability of draws after the break (X/X 13% and X/1 13%) and a low chance of a complete turnaround by the visitors (1/2 6% and 2/2 6%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| UTS Rabat | Maghreb Fès | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 42% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Maghreb Fès is 150% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - UTS Rabat · 2 pts / match - Maghreb Fès
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Maghreb Fès is 40% better for: goals scored per match.
1.05 goals / match - UTS Rabat · 1.47 goals / match - Maghreb Fès
Maghreb Fès is 208% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.63 goals / match - UTS Rabat · 0.53 goals / match - Maghreb Fès
UTS Rabat scores in 74% of matches (14 of 19 matches), while Maghreb Fès keeps a clean sheet in 58% (11 of 19 matches).
Maghreb Fès scores in 74% of matches (14 of 19 matches), while UTS Rabat keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 19 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - UTS Rabat
Over / Under - Maghreb Fès
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Maghreb Fès is 107% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.84 pts / match - UTS Rabat · 1.74 pts / match - Maghreb Fès
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
UTS Rabat - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 5%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Maghreb Fès - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 53%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
UTS Rabat
Maghreb Fès
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Botola Pro).
Teams vs league
| UTS Rabat | Liga | Maghreb Fès | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.68 | 2.17 | ▼ 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 74% | 50% | ▼ 37% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 32% | 38% | ▼ 26% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 31% | ▲ 58% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 63% | 61% | ▼ 58% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 84% | 75% | ▼ 68% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: UTS Rabat 0 - 0 - 1 Maghreb Fès. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of UTS Rabat vs Maghreb Fès?
The Botola Pro match finished UTS Rabat 0:1 Maghreb Fès. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before UTS Rabat vs Maghreb Fès?
UTS Rabat score 1.05 goals per game on average and Maghreb Fès 1.47. The Botola Pro average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 38% of games. Both teams score in 74% of UTS Rabat's matches and 37% of Maghreb Fès's.
What form are UTS Rabat and Maghreb Fès in?
Over the last 5 games UTS Rabat have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Maghreb Fès 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for UTS Rabat vs Maghreb Fès?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


