Uxbridge vs Sholing: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Uxbridge played Sholing in Southern League Premier South (England). The match was played on 25 November 2025. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Uxbridge: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Sholing: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Uxbridge scores 1.88 and concedes 1.71 goals per match. Sholing scores 1.71 and concedes 1.29. League average: 3.13 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Uxbridge 82%, Sholing 65%. Over 2.5: Uxbridge 82%, Sholing 47%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 60%.

xG, shots and style

Sholing has higher xG: 1.41 vs 1.34. Uxbridge: 5.1 shots per match, Sholing: 3.4.

Match halves

Uxbridge: half-time lead 47%, second-half goals 0.94. Sholing: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.88.

Goals by minute

Uxbridge: 0-15 (7 goals). Sholing: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Southern League Premier South: 3.13 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 60%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

43Possession (%)57
UxbridgeSholing
12Shots17
UxbridgeSholing
6Shots on target4
UxbridgeSholing
1.67xG1.87
UxbridgeSholing
5Corners4
UxbridgeSholing
68Dangerous attacks72
UxbridgeSholing
-1Fouls-1
UxbridgeSholing
-1Cards-1
UxbridgeSholing

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.88Goals scored / match1.71
UxbridgeSholing
1.71Goals conceded / match1.29
UxbridgeSholing
24%Average possession17%
UxbridgeSholing
2.35Shots on target / match1.18
UxbridgeSholing

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

5.12Shots per match3.41
UxbridgeSholing
2.35Shots on target1.18
UxbridgeSholing
36.8%Shot conversion50%
UxbridgeSholing
24%Possession17%
UxbridgeSholing
1.34xG for1.41
UxbridgeSholing
1.28xG against0.97
UxbridgeSholing

Shooting quality

Uxbridge: Counter-attackingSholing: Counter-attacking
UxbridgeSholing
Accuracy (shots on target)46%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.260.41
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.801.45

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Uxbridge is 50% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / match - Uxbridge · 1.2 pts / match - Sholing

Uxbridge
WWWLL
Season result split
41% W41% D18% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-7-3
1.65 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-2-2
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.13Opponent xG: 0.96BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%
Sholing
DWLDD
Season result split
35% W47% D18% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-8-3
1.53 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-5-2
Last 5 away
1-3-1
LWDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 0.00Opponent xG: 0.00BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Uxbridge is 10% better for: goals scored per match.

1.88 goals / match - Uxbridge · 1.71 goals / match - Sholing

Sholing is 33% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.71 goals / match - Uxbridge · 1.29 goals / match - Sholing

Uxbridge scoring profile: very strong

Uxbridge scores in 88% of matches (15 of 17 matches), while Sholing keeps a clean sheet in 24% (4 of 17 matches).

Sholing scoring profile: very strong

Sholing scores in 82% of matches (14 of 17 matches), while Uxbridge keeps a clean sheet in 12% (2 of 17 matches).

32Goals scored (season)29
UxbridgeSholing
29Goals conceded (season)22
UxbridgeSholing
3.59Average goals in match3
UxbridgeSholing
11Goals scored (last 5)9
UxbridgeSholing
10Goals conceded (last 5)8
UxbridgeSholing

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal82%
UxbridgeSholing
65%2 goals41%
UxbridgeSholing
29%3 goals29%
UxbridgeSholing
6%4 goals12%
UxbridgeSholing

How often they concede at least...

88%1 goal76%
UxbridgeSholing
47%2 goals41%
UxbridgeSholing
35%3 goals12%
UxbridgeSholing
0%4 goals0%
UxbridgeSholing

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

61%
League average

Goal patterns

35%BTTS at half-time41%
UxbridgeSholing
12%BTTS in both halves24%
UxbridgeSholing
41%Scored in both halves35%
UxbridgeSholing

BTTS and goal count

71%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
UxbridgeSholing
12%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
UxbridgeSholing
80%BTTS - last 580%
UxbridgeSholing

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

82%Min. 1 goal before half-time71%
UxbridgeSholing
47%Min. 2 goals before half-time47%
UxbridgeSholing
24%Min. 3 goals before half-time18%
UxbridgeSholing

2nd half

82%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
UxbridgeSholing
71%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
UxbridgeSholing
29%Min. 3 goals after half-time18%
UxbridgeSholing

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Uxbridge is 30% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.76 pts / match - Uxbridge · 1.35 pts / match - Sholing

Uxbridge - half-time state
47% leading35% draw18% trailing
Sholing - half-time state
24% leading65% draw12% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.76Points per match (1st half)1.35
UxbridgeSholing
0.94Goals scored (1st half)0.82
UxbridgeSholing
0.65Goals conceded (1st half)0.65
UxbridgeSholing
1.59Average goals (1st half)1.47
UxbridgeSholing
53%Clean sheet before half-time47%
UxbridgeSholing
29%No goal before half-time41%
UxbridgeSholing

After half-time (2nd half)

1.24Points per match (2nd half)1.53
UxbridgeSholing
0.94Goals scored (2nd half)0.88
UxbridgeSholing
1.06Goals conceded (2nd half)0.65
UxbridgeSholing
2Average goals (2nd half)1.53
UxbridgeSholing
35%Clean sheet after half-time41%
UxbridgeSholing
41%No goal after half-time41%
UxbridgeSholing

Uxbridge - second-half results

29% W35% D35% L
30
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.76
PPG before half-time
Lead holding87%

Leads at half-time in 47% of matches and wins 41%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Sholing - second-half results

35% W47% D18% L
23
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.35
PPG before half-time
Lead holding146%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Uxbridge - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.601.80
Goals scored / match0.81.4
Goals conceded / match0.61.4
Average goals in match1.42.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%100%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Sholing - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.40
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.61.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 80% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Uxbridge
ScoredConceded
7
6
0-15
6
2
16-30
3
3
31-45
5
2
46-60
7
4
61-75
4
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.

Sholing
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
4
2
16-30
6
4
31-45
1
4
46-60
5
2
61-75
9
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.29
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
74%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-9%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
72%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Uxbridge

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.11
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.54
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.43
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
108%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
123%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 22% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

Sholing

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.44
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.32
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
123%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
74%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Southern League Premier South).

Teams vs league

UxbridgeLigaSholing
Average goals in match▲ 3.593.13▼ 3.00
Both teams scored▲ 82%61%▲ 65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 82%60%▼ 47%
Clean sheets▼ 12%22%▲ 24%
Goal before half-time▲ 82%77%▼ 71%
Goal after half-time▲ 82%80%▼ 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.13
Average goals per match
61%
Both teams scored
60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.74
Home goals / match
1.39
Away goals / match
+25%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defence advantage
+16%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
80%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Away team

Other recorded players

—Jake McCarthy⚽ 2

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. SholingGoalJake McCarthy
  2. SholingGoalJake McCarthy

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Uxbridge 0 - 0 - 1 Sholing. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Sholing
3 : 0
Uxbridge

FAQ

What was the result of Uxbridge vs Sholing?

The Southern League Premier South match finished Uxbridge 0:2 Sholing. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Uxbridge vs Sholing?

Uxbridge score 1.88 goals per game on average and Sholing 1.71. The Southern League Premier South average is 3.13 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 82% of Uxbridge's matches and 65% of Sholing's.

What form are Uxbridge and Sholing in?

Over the last 5 games Uxbridge have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Sholing 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Uxbridge vs Sholing?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.