Italy - Serie C Group BStadio Ferruccio ChittolinaData current as of 03 November 2026

Vado vs Pescara: match statistics

Vado crest
Vado
0 : 1half-time 0:1
Pescara crest
Pescara

Vado vs Pescara: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Vado played Pescara in Serie C Group B (Italy). The match was played on 20 September 2026. Venue: Stadio Ferruccio Chittolina. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Vado: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Pescara: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Vado scores 1.00 and concedes 1.40 goals per match. Pescara scores 1.40 and concedes 1.80. League average: 2.62 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Vado 40%, Pescara 60%. Over 2.5: Vado 40%, Pescara 40%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

Pescara has higher xG: 2.05 vs 1.33. Vado: 10.4 shots per match, Pescara: 19.2.

Match halves

Vado: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.00. Pescara: half-time lead 20%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Vado: 31-45+ (3 goals). Pescara: 61-75 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Serie C Group B: 2.62 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Both teams have identical records in their last five matches—1 win, 1 draw, and 3 defeats—but Vado have been considerably more consistent at home. The hosts concede just 0.5 goals per game on their own turf and have kept a clean sheet in 50% of matches, while Pescara score 2 goals away from home but also allow their opponents as many as 4 goals per game on average. The visitors create more chances, recording 16.5 shots and an xG of 1.82 away from home, compared with Vado’s 11 shots and xG of 1.39 at home; however, they have lost both of their away fixtures so far. The key factor should be the difference in defensive organisation: Vado’s xG against is 0.99, compared with 1.86 for Pescara, giving the hosts a solid foundation to exploit their opponents’ defensive weaknesses. Home advantage and a much more reliable defence point towards a narrow Vado victory, although Pescara’s attacking potential clearly increases the risk of a draw or an away goal.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The stronger signal points to BTTS - No, primarily due to Vado’s limited attacking efficiency: the team averages 0.6 goals over its last 5 matches and has failed to score in 50% of its season games. Vado does have an xG of 1.17 across its last five appearances, but its BTTS rate during this period is only 20%, well below the league average of 53%. Pescara concedes an average of 1.8 goals in its last 5 matches and has not kept a clean sheet in the available season data, giving the hosts a chance to score, although their shot conversion stands at just 6%. The visitors should pose an attacking threat, recording 1.2 goals and an xG of 1.83 over their last five matches, while Vado allows opponents an xG of 1.36. However, the most likely scenario remains one in which Pescara scores and Vado once again fails to convert its chances.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

In their last five matches, Vado scored only 0.6 goals per game, while Pescara averaged 1.2, with average goals conceded of 1.4 and 1.8, respectively. During this period, both teams had at least three goals in just 40% of their matches, which limits the case for a high-scoring game. Pescara does, however, create more quality chances, with an average xG of 1.83 compared with Vado’s 1.17, so an away goal remains clearly likely. The estimated total of 2.45 goals is close to the league average of 2.5, but leaves a solid margin for a result with a maximum of three goals. The strongest pick is Under 3.5, as at least four goals are required for this bet to lose—something not supported by the hosts’ recent finishing or the results distribution of either team.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely HT/FT outcome is a draw at half-time followed by a Vado victory, as both teams were level after 45 minutes in 40% of their last five matches. Vado have averaged 1.0 goal and conceded none in their recent home games, whereas Pescara have conceded as many as 4.0 goals per away match and lost 100% of those fixtures. The hosts also have the more favourable defensive profile in terms of chance quality: they allow 1.40 xG compared with Pescara’s 1.86, while their attacking xG figures are similar at 1.90 and 1.82 respectively. The second half could prove decisive, as Pescara concede an average of 2.5 goals after the break, while Vado have not allowed their opponents to score a single second-half goal in their home matches. Both teams’ recent form is poor, with 0.8 points per match across their last five appearances, so a draw at half-time remains clearly more likely than an early lead for the hosts.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

48Possession (%)52
VadoPescara
10Shots19
VadoPescara
3Shots on target7
VadoPescara
1.22xG2.02
VadoPescara
5Corners2
VadoPescara
51Dangerous attacks46
VadoPescara
15Fouls15
VadoPescara
4Cards3
VadoPescara

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1Goals scored / match1.4
VadoPescara
1.4Goals conceded / match1.8
VadoPescara
55%Average possession55%
VadoPescara
2.8Shots on target / match5
VadoPescara

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.4Shots per match19.2
VadoPescara
2.8Shots on target5
VadoPescara
9.6%Shot conversion7.3%
VadoPescara
55%Possession55%
VadoPescara
1.33xG for2.05
VadoPescara
1.46xG against1.52
VadoPescara

Shooting quality

Vado: BalancedPescara: Dominant
VadoPescara
Accuracy (shots on target)27%26%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Pescara is 25% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Vado · 1 pts / match - Pescara

Vado
WDLLL
Season result split
20% W20% D60% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 at home
1-0-1
WL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.33Opponent xG: 1.46BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Pescara
WLDLD
Season result split
20% W40% D40% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-2
Last 5 away
0-0-2
LL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 2.05Opponent xG: 1.52BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Pescara is 40% better for: goals scored per match.

1 goals / match - Vado · 1.4 goals / match - Pescara

Vado is 29% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.4 goals / match - Vado · 1.8 goals / match - Pescara

Vado scoring profile: mixed

Vado scores in 60% of matches (3 of 5 matches), while Pescara keeps a clean sheet in 40% (2 of 5 matches).

Pescara scoring profile: strong

Pescara scores in 80% of matches (4 of 5 matches), while Vado keeps a clean sheet in 40% (2 of 5 matches).

5Goals scored (season)7
VadoPescara
7Goals conceded (season)9
VadoPescara
2.4Average goals in match3.2
VadoPescara
5Goals scored (last 5)7
VadoPescara
7Goals conceded (last 5)9
VadoPescara

How often they score at least...

60%1 goal80%
VadoPescara
40%2 goals40%
VadoPescara
0%3 goals20%
VadoPescara
0%4 goals0%
VadoPescara

How often they concede at least...

60%1 goal60%
VadoPescara
40%2 goals40%
VadoPescara
40%3 goals20%
VadoPescara
0%4 goals20%
VadoPescara

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

40%BTTS at half-time20%
VadoPescara
0%BTTS in both halves20%
VadoPescara
0%Scored in both halves40%
VadoPescara

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
VadoPescara
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
VadoPescara
40%BTTS - last 560%
VadoPescara

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
VadoPescara
60%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
VadoPescara
40%Min. 3 goals before half-time20%
VadoPescara

2nd half

20%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
VadoPescara
20%Min. 2 goals after half-time40%
VadoPescara
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time40%
VadoPescara

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Vado is 40% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.4 pts / match - Vado · 1 pts / match - Pescara

Vado - half-time state
40% leading20% draw40% trailing
Pescara - half-time state
20% leading40% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.4Points per match (1st half)1
VadoPescara
1Goals scored (1st half)0.4
VadoPescara
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.8
VadoPescara
2Average goals (1st half)1.2
VadoPescara
40%Clean sheet before half-time60%
VadoPescara
40%No goal before half-time60%
VadoPescara

After half-time (2nd half)

0.8Points per match (2nd half)1.4
VadoPescara
0Goals scored (2nd half)1
VadoPescara
0.4Goals conceded (2nd half)1
VadoPescara
0.4Average goals (2nd half)2
VadoPescara
80%Clean sheet after half-time60%
VadoPescara
100%No goal after half-time20%
VadoPescara

Vado - second-half results

0% W80% D20% L
7
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 20%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.6

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Pescara - second-half results

40% W20% D40% L
5
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 20% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Vado - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match1.00.0
Goals conceded / match1.00.4
Average goals in match2.00.4
1 goal80%20%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal40%100%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Pescara - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.40
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.81.0
Average goals in match1.22.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-20
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Vado
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
1
1
16-30
3
0
31-45
0
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (3 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Pescara
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
4
16-30
0
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
2
1
61-75
2
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.80
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
107%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Vado

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.27
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.33
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.06
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
65%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
130%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-1.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Pescara

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.53
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.93
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.65
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
130%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
117%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie C Group B).

Teams vs league

VadoLigaPescara
Average goals in match▼ 2.402.62▲ 3.20
Both teams scored▼ 40%58%▲ 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 40%50%▼ 40%
Clean sheets▲ 40%26%▲ 40%
Goal before half-time▲ 80%69%▼ 60%
Goal after half-time▼ 20%75%▲ 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.62
Average goals per match
58%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.54
Home goals / match
1.08
Away goals / match
+43%
Home attack advantage
+30%
Home defence advantage
+29%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. PescaraGoalGaetano Letizia
  2. VadoYellow cardLuca Piana
  3. VadoYellow cardZaccaria Hamlili
  4. VadoSubstitutionOn: Giorgio LionettiOff: Zaccaria Hamlili
  5. PescaraYellow cardGiacomo Parigi
  6. VadoYellow cardDenis Hergheligiu
  7. PescaraSubstitutionOn: Lorenzo MeacciOff: Michele D'Ausilio
  8. VadoSubstitutionOn: Iacopo CernigoiOff: Diego Vita
  9. PescaraSubstitutionOn: Bilal ErradiOff: Jacopo Sardo
  10. PescaraYellow cardLorenzo Meacci
  11. VadoYellow cardIacopo Cernigoi
  12. PescaraYellow cardRiccardo Capellini

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Vado vs Pescara?

The Serie C Group B match finished Vado 0:1 Pescara. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Vado vs Pescara?

Vado score 1.00 goals per game on average and Pescara 1.40. The Serie C Group B average is 2.62 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Vado's matches and 60% of Pescara's.

What form are Vado and Pescara in?

Over the last 5 games Vado have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Pescara 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Vado vs Pescara?

The statistical background for Vado vs Pescara — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.