Vaduz vs Grasshopper: match statistics
Vaduz vs Grasshopper: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Vaduz played Grasshopper in Super League (Switzerland). The match was played on 30 August 2026. Venue: Rheinpark Stadion. Final score: 5:2.
Current form
Vaduz: 0-0-4, 0.00 points/match. Grasshopper: 0-1-2, 0.33 points/match.
Goal statistics
Vaduz scores 1.75 and concedes 3.00 goals per match. Grasshopper scores 1.00 and concedes 2.33. League average: 3.80 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Vaduz 100%, Grasshopper 100%. Over 2.5: Vaduz 100%, Grasshopper 67%. League level: BTTS 76%, Over 2.5 80%.
xG, shots and style
Vaduz has higher xG: 1.44 vs 1.32. Vaduz: 13.5 shots per match, Grasshopper: 11.7.
Match halves
Vaduz: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.50. Grasshopper: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.33.
Goals by minute
Vaduz: 0-15 (2 goals). Grasshopper: 0-15 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Super League: 3.80 goals per match, BTTS 76%, Over 2.5 80%.
Head-to-head
No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Vaduz remain winless after 4 league matches and have collected just 1 point from their last five games, losing 4 times. The hosts average 2 goals scored at home, but their defence is highly error-prone: they concede 3 goals per match and allow opponents an xG of 2.66. Grasshopper have a clearly superior current run, having earned 7 points and scored 10 goals in their last five matches, compared with Vaduz’s 9 goals scored and as many as 14 conceded. The visitors are also considerably more solid defensively, conceding an average of 1.5 goals away from home and allowing opponents an xG of 1.54. Both teams regularly find the net, but greater defensive stability and better recent results point to a Grasshopper victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The signal for goals from both sides is very strong, as Vaduz and Grasshopper have recorded BTTS - Yes in 100% of their league matches so far, while their figures over the last five games stand at 100% and 80%, respectively. Neither team has kept a clean sheet yet, and neither has ended a match without scoring. In their last five appearances, Vaduz averaged 1.8 goals scored and 2.8 conceded, while Grasshopper averaged 2.0 goals scored and 1.6 conceded. The high xG figures from the last five matches—1.60 for Vaduz and 1.61 for Grasshopper—support the genuine quality of the chances created by both sides. An additional argument is the league-wide BTTS average of 71%, making the scenario in which at least one team fails to score—BTTS - No—look considerably less likely.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams have exceeded the 1.5-goal threshold in every match played so far this season, while Vaduz have shown an exceptionally weak defense, conceding an average of 4.0 goals per game. In their last five matches, Vaduz scored 1.8 goals and conceded 2.8, whereas Grasshopper scored 2.0 and allowed their opponents 1.6 goals. Their attacking potential is also confirmed by xG: 1.60 for the home side and 1.61 for the visitors, combined with high xG conceded by both defenses, at 2.12 and 1.81 respectively. In addition, both teams have scored in every match this season, while the league average stands at as many as 3.76 goals per game. Over 1.5 goals is the strongest pick, as even with a more conservative chance-conversion rate, the data clearly points to at least two goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Grasshopper are showing better current form: over their last five matches, they averaged 1.4 points and won 40% of their games, while Vaduz failed to win any, lost 80% of their matches, and averaged just 0.2 points per game. The visitors have been more stable before the break, as they led at half-time in 40% of matches in this run and conceded an average of 0.6 goals, compared with 1.2 goals conceded by the hosts. The strongest argument for the visitors maintaining their advantage lies in the second half: Vaduz conceded an average of 1.6 goals during this period and failed to win any of their last five second halves, whereas Grasshopper won the second half in 60% of cases. Vaduz’s seasonal home data are also alarming, as the team conceded an average of 4.0 goals per match and lost every game, compared with Grasshopper’s average of 1.5 goals conceded away from home. The scenario in which Grasshopper lead at the break and go on to win is therefore the most likely, although the high number of goals scored by both sides also increases the risk of Half-Time/Full-Time outcomes involving a draw at half-time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Vaduz | Grasshopper | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.39 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Vaduz is 75% better for: goals scored per match.
1.75 goals / match - Vaduz · 1 goals / match - Grasshopper
Grasshopper is 29% better for: goals conceded per match.
3 goals / match - Vaduz · 2.33 goals / match - Grasshopper
Vaduz scores in 100% of matches (4 of 4 matches), while Grasshopper keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 matches).
Grasshopper scores in 100% of matches (3 of 3 matches), while Vaduz keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Vaduz
Over / Under - Grasshopper
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Grasshopper is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.25 pts / match - Vaduz · 1.33 pts / match - Grasshopper
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Vaduz - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Grasshopper - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.25 | 0.75 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.3 | 0.5 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| Average goals in match | 2.8 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 75% |
| 3 goals | 50% | 25% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 25% |
| No goal | 25% | 50% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.33 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.7 | 0.3 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.7 | 1.7 |
| Average goals in match | 1.3 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 33% | 33% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 33% |
| Clean sheet | 33% | 33% |
| No goal | 33% | 67% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -4 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Vaduz
Grasshopper
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).
Teams vs league
| Vaduz | Liga | Grasshopper | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 4.75 | 3.80 | ▼ 3.33 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 100% | 76% | ▲ 100% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 100% | 80% | ▼ 67% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 12% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 84% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 92% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of Vaduz vs Grasshopper?
The Super League match finished Vaduz 5:2 Grasshopper. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Vaduz vs Grasshopper?
Vaduz score 1.75 goals per game on average and Grasshopper 1.00. The Super League average is 3.80 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 80% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Vaduz's matches and 100% of Grasshopper's.
What form are Vaduz and Grasshopper in?
Over the last 5 games Vaduz have a 0-0-4 record (0.00 points per game) and Grasshopper 0-1-2 (0.33 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Vaduz vs Grasshopper?
The statistical background for Vaduz vs Grasshopper — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


