Switzerland - Super LeagueRheinpark StadionData current as of 31 August 2026

Vaduz vs Grasshopper: match statistics

Vaduz crest
Vaduz
5 : 2half-time 2:2
Grasshopper crest
Grasshopper

Vaduz vs Grasshopper: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Vaduz played Grasshopper in Super League (Switzerland). The match was played on 30 August 2026. Venue: Rheinpark Stadion. Final score: 5:2.

Current form

Vaduz: 0-0-4, 0.00 points/match. Grasshopper: 0-1-2, 0.33 points/match.

Goal statistics

Vaduz scores 1.75 and concedes 3.00 goals per match. Grasshopper scores 1.00 and concedes 2.33. League average: 3.80 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Vaduz 100%, Grasshopper 100%. Over 2.5: Vaduz 100%, Grasshopper 67%. League level: BTTS 76%, Over 2.5 80%.

xG, shots and style

Vaduz has higher xG: 1.44 vs 1.32. Vaduz: 13.5 shots per match, Grasshopper: 11.7.

Match halves

Vaduz: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.50. Grasshopper: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.33.

Goals by minute

Vaduz: 0-15 (2 goals). Grasshopper: 0-15 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Super League: 3.80 goals per match, BTTS 76%, Over 2.5 80%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Vaduz remain winless after 4 league matches and have collected just 1 point from their last five games, losing 4 times. The hosts average 2 goals scored at home, but their defence is highly error-prone: they concede 3 goals per match and allow opponents an xG of 2.66. Grasshopper have a clearly superior current run, having earned 7 points and scored 10 goals in their last five matches, compared with Vaduz’s 9 goals scored and as many as 14 conceded. The visitors are also considerably more solid defensively, conceding an average of 1.5 goals away from home and allowing opponents an xG of 1.54. Both teams regularly find the net, but greater defensive stability and better recent results point to a Grasshopper victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for goals from both sides is very strong, as Vaduz and Grasshopper have recorded BTTS - Yes in 100% of their league matches so far, while their figures over the last five games stand at 100% and 80%, respectively. Neither team has kept a clean sheet yet, and neither has ended a match without scoring. In their last five appearances, Vaduz averaged 1.8 goals scored and 2.8 conceded, while Grasshopper averaged 2.0 goals scored and 1.6 conceded. The high xG figures from the last five matches—1.60 for Vaduz and 1.61 for Grasshopper—support the genuine quality of the chances created by both sides. An additional argument is the league-wide BTTS average of 71%, making the scenario in which at least one team fails to score—BTTS - No—look considerably less likely.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams have exceeded the 1.5-goal threshold in every match played so far this season, while Vaduz have shown an exceptionally weak defense, conceding an average of 4.0 goals per game. In their last five matches, Vaduz scored 1.8 goals and conceded 2.8, whereas Grasshopper scored 2.0 and allowed their opponents 1.6 goals. Their attacking potential is also confirmed by xG: 1.60 for the home side and 1.61 for the visitors, combined with high xG conceded by both defenses, at 2.12 and 1.81 respectively. In addition, both teams have scored in every match this season, while the league average stands at as many as 3.76 goals per game. Over 1.5 goals is the strongest pick, as even with a more conservative chance-conversion rate, the data clearly points to at least two goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Grasshopper are showing better current form: over their last five matches, they averaged 1.4 points and won 40% of their games, while Vaduz failed to win any, lost 80% of their matches, and averaged just 0.2 points per game. The visitors have been more stable before the break, as they led at half-time in 40% of matches in this run and conceded an average of 0.6 goals, compared with 1.2 goals conceded by the hosts. The strongest argument for the visitors maintaining their advantage lies in the second half: Vaduz conceded an average of 1.6 goals during this period and failed to win any of their last five second halves, whereas Grasshopper won the second half in 60% of cases. Vaduz’s seasonal home data are also alarming, as the team conceded an average of 4.0 goals per match and lost every game, compared with Grasshopper’s average of 1.5 goals conceded away from home. The scenario in which Grasshopper lead at the break and go on to win is therefore the most likely, although the high number of goals scored by both sides also increases the risk of Half-Time/Full-Time outcomes involving a draw at half-time.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

2 : 2
1st half
3 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
VaduzGrasshopper
13Shots16
VaduzGrasshopper
6Shots on target3
VaduzGrasshopper
1.48xG1.72
VaduzGrasshopper
5Corners9
VaduzGrasshopper
34Dangerous attacks69
VaduzGrasshopper
11Fouls12
VaduzGrasshopper
2Cards1
VaduzGrasshopper

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.75Goals scored / match1
VaduzGrasshopper
3Goals conceded / match2.33
VaduzGrasshopper
53%Average possession46%
VaduzGrasshopper
4.5Shots on target / match3.33
VaduzGrasshopper

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.5Shots per match11.67
VaduzGrasshopper
4.5Shots on target3.33
VaduzGrasshopper
13%Shot conversion8.6%
VaduzGrasshopper
53%Possession46%
VaduzGrasshopper
1.44xG for1.32
VaduzGrasshopper
2.4xG against1.59
VaduzGrasshopper

Shooting quality

Vaduz: Efficient finishingGrasshopper: Balanced
VaduzGrasshopper
Accuracy (shots on target)33%29%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.390.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Vaduz
LLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W0% R100% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-0-4
0.00 pts / match · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-4
0.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 at home
0-0-1
L
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.44Opponent xG: 2.40BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
Grasshopper
DLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W33% R67% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-2
0.33 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-2
0.33 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-1
Last 5 away
0-1-1
DL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.3xG: 1.32Opponent xG: 1.59BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 67%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Vaduz is 75% better for: goals scored per match.

1.75 goals / match - Vaduz · 1 goals / match - Grasshopper

Grasshopper is 29% better for: goals conceded per match.

3 goals / match - Vaduz · 2.33 goals / match - Grasshopper

Vaduz scoring profile: very strong

Vaduz scores in 100% of matches (4 of 4 matches), while Grasshopper keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 matches).

Grasshopper scoring profile: very strong

Grasshopper scores in 100% of matches (3 of 3 matches), while Vaduz keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 matches).

7Goals scored (season)3
VaduzGrasshopper
12Goals conceded (season)7
VaduzGrasshopper
4.75Average goals in match3.33
VaduzGrasshopper
7Goals scored (last 5)3
VaduzGrasshopper
12Goals conceded (last 5)7
VaduzGrasshopper

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
VaduzGrasshopper
75%2 goals0%
VaduzGrasshopper
0%3 goals0%
VaduzGrasshopper
0%4 goals0%
VaduzGrasshopper

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal100%
VaduzGrasshopper
100%2 goals67%
VaduzGrasshopper
75%3 goals33%
VaduzGrasshopper
25%4 goals33%
VaduzGrasshopper

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

75%BTTS at half-time33%
VaduzGrasshopper
25%BTTS in both halves0%
VaduzGrasshopper
25%Scored in both halves0%
VaduzGrasshopper

BTTS and goal count

100%Min. 3 goals and BTTS67%
VaduzGrasshopper
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
VaduzGrasshopper
100%BTTS - last 5100%
VaduzGrasshopper

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
VaduzGrasshopper
100%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
VaduzGrasshopper
50%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
VaduzGrasshopper

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
VaduzGrasshopper
75%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
VaduzGrasshopper
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
VaduzGrasshopper

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Grasshopper is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.25 pts / match - Vaduz · 1.33 pts / match - Grasshopper

Vaduz - half-time state
25% leading50% draw25% trailing
Grasshopper - half-time state
33% leading33% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.25Points per match (1st half)1.33
VaduzGrasshopper
1.25Goals scored (1st half)0.67
VaduzGrasshopper
1.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
VaduzGrasshopper
2.75Average goals (1st half)1.33
VaduzGrasshopper
0%Clean sheet before half-time33%
VaduzGrasshopper
25%No goal before half-time33%
VaduzGrasshopper

After half-time (2nd half)

0.75Points per match (2nd half)1
VaduzGrasshopper
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.33
VaduzGrasshopper
1.5Goals conceded (2nd half)1.67
VaduzGrasshopper
2Average goals (2nd half)2
VaduzGrasshopper
25%Clean sheet after half-time33%
VaduzGrasshopper
50%No goal after half-time67%
VaduzGrasshopper

Vaduz - second-half results

25% W0% R75% P
5
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Grasshopper - second-half results

33% W0% R67% P
4
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+1.0

Concedes 1.0 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Vaduz - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.250.75
Goals scored / match1.30.5
Goals conceded / match1.51.5
Average goals in match2.82.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals100%75%
3 goals50%25%
Clean sheet0%25%
No goal25%50%
Goal difference-1-4
Half-time: 25% leading - 50% draw - 25% trailing
2nd half: 25% won - 0% draw - 75% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 75% - Half-time goals total: 5
Grasshopper - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.331.00
Goals scored / match0.70.3
Goals conceded / match0.71.7
Average goals in match1.32.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals33%33%
3 goals0%33%
Clean sheet33%33%
No goal33%67%
Goal difference0-4
Half-time: 33% leading - 33% draw - 33% trailing
2nd half: 33% won - 0% draw - 67% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 33% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Vaduz
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
1
2
16-30
2
2
31-45
1
1
46-60
1
1
61-75
0
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Grasshopper
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
1
1
16-30
0
1
31-45
0
1
46-60
0
2
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

4.04
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.0 : 2.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
100%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Vaduz

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.96
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.29
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.60
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
89%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
163%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.8
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 29% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Grasshopper

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.27
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.06
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.74
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
54%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
119%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 33% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).

Teams vs league

VaduzLigaGrasshopper
Average goals in match 4.753.80 3.33
Both teams scored 100%76% 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 100%80% 67%
Clean sheets 0%12% 0%
Goal before half-time 100%84% 100%
Goal after half-time 100%92% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.80
Average goals per match
76%
Both teams scored
80%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
12%
Clean sheets
1.96
Home goals / match
1.84
Away goals / match
+7%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
8%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
92%
1 goal
68%
2 goals
40%
3 goals
16%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. VaduzGoalLutfi Dalipi
  2. GrasshopperSubstitutionOn: Óscar Clemente MuesOff: Tim Meyer
  3. VaduzYellow cardJulian Stark
  4. GrasshopperSubstitutionOn: Luke PlangeOff: Nikolas Marcel Cristiano Muci
  5. GrasshopperYellow cardJustin Hammel
  6. VaduzSubstitutionOn: Daniel KasperOff: Marcel Michael Monsberger
  7. VaduzYellow cardJuan Ignacio Cabrera

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Vaduz vs Grasshopper?

The Super League match finished Vaduz 5:2 Grasshopper. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Vaduz vs Grasshopper?

Vaduz score 1.75 goals per game on average and Grasshopper 1.00. The Super League average is 3.80 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 80% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Vaduz's matches and 100% of Grasshopper's.

What form are Vaduz and Grasshopper in?

Over the last 5 games Vaduz have a 0-0-4 record (0.00 points per game) and Grasshopper 0-1-2 (0.33 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Vaduz vs Grasshopper?

The statistical background for Vaduz vs Grasshopper — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.