Vålerenga vs KFUM: match statistics
Vålerenga vs KFUM: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Vålerenga play KFUM in Eliteserien (Norway). The match date is 3 May 2026 at 19:15. Final score: 2:2.
Current form
Vålerenga: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. KFUM: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Vålerenga scores 1.46 and concedes 1.69 goals per match. KFUM scores 1.00 and concedes 1.62. League average: 2.95 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Vålerenga 46%, KFUM 46%. Over 2.5: Vålerenga 46%, KFUM 54%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 57%.
xG, shots and style
Vålerenga has higher xG: 1.75 vs 1.26. Vålerenga: 15.8 shots per match, KFUM: 10.6.
Match halves
Vålerenga: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.69. KFUM: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.38.
Goals by minute
Vålerenga: 0-15 (4 goals). KFUM: 0-15 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Eliteserien: 2.95 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 57%.
Head-to-head
2 H2H matches: 1-1-0. Average goals 1.50, BTTS 50%.
Match description
I back '2' — a KFUM win. Visitors average 5.67 shots on target away versus hosts’ 3.33 SoT at home and have 53% possession versus Vålerengi’s 44%. Vålerenga scores only 0.33 goals per home match despite an average xG of 1.61, indicating finishing issues — they fail to score in 67% of home games and have a conversion rate around 2%. KFUM, meanwhile, average 1.0 away goals, a conversion of ~7% and on average 14 shots and 5.67 SoT, giving them realistic potential to score at least once. Both teams are in poor form (0.8 pts per match over the last 5) and defenses are vulnerable — Vålerenga concedes 1.0 goals at home, KFUM concedes 3.0 goals away, so I expect an open game with goals. Considering the visitors’ advantage in possession, SoT and higher efficiency, I give KFUM a 55% chance, draw 25% and the hosts 20%.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Vålerenga | KFUM | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.24 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Vålerenga is 125% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Vålerenga · 0.8 pts / match - KFUM
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Vålerenga is 46% better for: goals scored per match.
1.46 goals / match - Vålerenga · 1 goals / match - KFUM
Vålerenga scores in 62% of matches (8 of 13 matches), while KFUM keeps a clean sheet in 31% (4 of 13 matches).
KFUM scores in 69% of matches (9 of 13 matches), while Vålerenga keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Vålerenga
Over / Under — KFUM
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Vålerenga is 54% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.31 pts / match - Vålerenga · 0.85 pts / match - KFUM
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Vålerenga - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
KFUM - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 23%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 2.6 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (3 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Vålerenga
KFUM
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eliteserien).
Teams vs league
| Vålerenga | Liga | KFUM | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.15 | 2.95 | ▼ 2.62 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 46% | 55% | ▼ 46% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 46% | 57% | ▼ 54% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 15% | 24% | ▲ 31% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 85% | 82% | ▲ 85% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 69% | 78% | ▼ 62% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Vålerenga 1 - 1 - 0 KFUM. Average goals 1.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Vålerenga vs KFUM?
The Eliteserien match finished Vålerenga 2:2 KFUM. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Vålerenga and KFUM?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Vålerenga won 1, KFUM won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Vålerenga vs KFUM?
Vålerenga score 1.46 goals per game on average and KFUM 1.00. The Eliteserien average is 2.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 46% of Vålerenga's matches and 46% of KFUM's.
What form are Vålerenga and KFUM in?
Over the last 5 games Vålerenga have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and KFUM 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Vålerenga vs KFUM?
The statistical background for Vålerenga vs KFUM — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.