Iceland - ÚrvalsdeildData current as of 22 July 2026

Valur vs Thór: match statistics

Valur crest
Valur
1 : 2half-time 1:1
Thór crest
Thór

Valur vs Thór: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Valur play Thór in Úrvalsdeild (Iceland). The match date is 12 April 2026 at 19:00. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Valur: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Thór: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Valur scores 1.63 and concedes 2.00 goals per match. Thór scores 1.13 and concedes 2.80. League average: 4.04 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Valur 69%, Thór 67%. Over 2.5: Valur 69%, Thór 73%. League level: BTTS 74%, Over 2.5 73%.

xG, shots and style

Valur has higher xG: 1.67 vs 1.18. Valur: 14.0 shots per match, Thór: 10.7.

Match halves

Valur: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.69. Thór: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.73.

Goals by minute

Valur: 0-15 (6 goals). Thór: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Úrvalsdeild: 4.04 goals per match, BTTS 74%, Over 2.5 73%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 6.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

I predict an away win (2). Thór scored 22 goals in the last 5 matches (avg. 4.4 per match) versus Valur's 9 goals (avg. 1.8), giving the visitors a clear offensive advantage. In the last 5 fixtures Thór won 3 matches and averages 1.8 points per match, while Valur won 2 matches with 1.2 points per match, meaning the visitors convert chances into points more efficiently. Defensively Thór also performs better — conceding 7 goals in the last 5 matches (1.4 per match) versus Valur's 11 goals (2.2 per match), and the goal difference over that period is +15 for Thór compared to -2 for Valur. Despite close league positions (9 vs 10), the edge in finishing efficiency and superior PPG lead to favoring Thór (65%), with 20% for a draw and 15% for a home upset.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

60Possession (%)40
ValurThór
14Shots14
ValurThór
8Shots on target2
ValurThór
2.17xG1.61
ValurThór
6Corners8
ValurThór
100Dangerous attacks79
ValurThór
16Fouls6
ValurThór
1Cards0
ValurThór

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.63Goals scored / match1.13
ValurThór
2Goals conceded / match2.8
ValurThór
50%Average possession39%
ValurThór
5.13Shots on target / match3.2
ValurThór

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

14Shots per match10.73
ValurThór
5.13Shots on target3.2
ValurThór
11.6%Shot conversion10.6%
ValurThór
50%Possession39%
ValurThór
1.67xG for1.18
ValurThór
2.23xG against2.36
ValurThór

Shooting quality

Valur: AttackingThór: Balanced
ValurThór
Accuracy (shots on target)37%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Thór is 25% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Valur · 1 pts / match - Thór

Valur
DWLLL
Season result split
38% W6% R56% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-1-9
1.19 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-4
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LWLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 2.03Opponent xG: 2.00BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%
Thór
DLDLW
Season result split
20% W13% R67% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-10
0.73 pts / match · goal difference -25
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-5
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 3.0xG: 1.08Opponent xG: 2.53BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Valur is 44% better for: goals scored per match.

1.63 goals / match - Valur · 1.13 goals / match - Thór

Valur is 40% better for: goals conceded per match.

2 goals / match - Valur · 2.8 goals / match - Thór

Valur scoring profile: very strong

Valur scores in 81% of matches (13 of 16 matches), while Thór keeps a clean sheet in 7% (1 of 15 matches).

Thór scoring profile: very strong

Thór scores in 73% of matches (11 of 15 matches), while Valur keeps a clean sheet in 13% (2 of 16 matches).

26Goals scored (season)17
ValurThór
32Goals conceded (season)42
ValurThór
3.63Average goals in match3.93
ValurThór
7Goals scored (last 5)9
ValurThór
9Goals conceded (last 5)15
ValurThór

How often they score at least...

81%1 goal73%
ValurThór
44%2 goals33%
ValurThór
25%3 goals7%
ValurThór
13%4 goals0%
ValurThór

How often they concede at least...

88%1 goal93%
ValurThór
63%2 goals60%
ValurThór
31%3 goals53%
ValurThór
13%4 goals40%
ValurThór

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

31%BTTS at half-time20%
ValurThór
0%BTTS in both halves0%
ValurThór
31%Scored in both halves7%
ValurThór

BTTS and goal count

63%Min. 3 goals and BTTS60%
ValurThór
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
ValurThór
60%BTTS - last 5100%
ValurThór

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

88%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
ValurThór
63%Min. 2 goals before half-time47%
ValurThór
31%Min. 3 goals before half-time27%
ValurThór

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time93%
ValurThór
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
ValurThór
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time47%
ValurThór

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Valur is 96% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.31 pts / match - Valur · 0.67 pts / match - Thór

Valur - half-time state
31% leading38% draw31% trailing
Thór - half-time state
13% leading27% draw60% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.31Points per match (1st half)0.67
ValurThór
0.94Goals scored (1st half)0.4
ValurThór
1.06Goals conceded (1st half)1.2
ValurThór
2Average goals (1st half)1.6
ValurThór
44%Clean sheet before half-time27%
ValurThór
38%No goal before half-time73%
ValurThór

After half-time (2nd half)

0.94Points per match (2nd half)1.07
ValurThór
0.69Goals scored (2nd half)0.73
ValurThór
0.94Goals conceded (2nd half)1.6
ValurThór
1.63Average goals (2nd half)2.33
ValurThór
38%Clean sheet after half-time27%
ValurThór
50%No goal after half-time47%
ValurThór

Valur - second-half results

19% W38% R44% P
21
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
15
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.31
PPG before half-time
Lead holding123%

Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Thór - second-half results

27% W27% R47% P
10
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-12
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-13
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding154%

Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 20%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Valur - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.600.80
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match0.61.2
Average goals in match1.41.8
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet80%20%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+1-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Thór - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.40
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match1.21.8
Average goals in match2.02.8
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals40%60%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-2-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Valur
ScoredConceded
6
5
0-15
6
5
16-30
3
7
31-45
4
3
46-60
1
5
61-75
6
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Thór
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
0
9
16-30
2
5
31-45
2
6
46-60
4
7
61-75
5
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.78
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.2 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
94%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
68%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+59%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
59%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Valur

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.56
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.04
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.23
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
74%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.39
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 23% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

Thór

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-1.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.49
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.44
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
61%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
127%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 24% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Úrvalsdeild).

Teams vs league

ValurLigaThór
Average goals in match 3.634.04 3.93
Both teams scored 69%74% 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 69%73% 73%
Clean sheets 13%14% 7%
Goal before half-time 88%82% 80%
Goal after half-time 81%88% 93%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

4.04
Average goals per match
74%
Both teams scored
73%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
14%
Clean sheets
2.21
Home goals / match
1.84
Away goals / match
+20%
Home attack advantage
+17%
Home defence advantage
+10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
14%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
65%
2 goals
43%
3 goals
21%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Valur 1 - 0 - 0 Thór. Average goals 6.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Valur vs Thór?

The Úrvalsdeild match finished Valur 1:2 Thór. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Valur vs Thór?

Valur score 1.63 goals per game on average and Thór 1.13. The Úrvalsdeild average is 4.04 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 73% of games. Both teams score in 69% of Valur's matches and 67% of Thór's.

What form are Valur and Thór in?

Over the last 5 games Valur have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Thór 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Valur vs Thór?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Valur vs Thór: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.