Armenia - Armenian Premier LeagueData current as of 06 September 2026

Van vs Alashkert: match statistics

Van crest
Van
0 : 1half-time 0:0
Alashkert crest
Alashkert

Van vs Alashkert: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Van played Alashkert in Armenian Premier League (Armenia). The match was played on 16 May 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Current form

Van: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Alashkert: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Van scores 1.04 and concedes 1.48 goals per match. Alashkert scores 1.56 and concedes 0.92. League average: 2.53 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Van 52%, Alashkert 52%. Over 2.5: Van 56%, Alashkert 44%. League level: BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 47%.

xG, shots and style

Alashkert has higher xG: 1.44 vs 1.17. Van: 10.3 shots per match, Alashkert: 11.3.

Match halves

Van: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.72. Alashkert: half-time lead 44%, second-half goals 0.72.

Goals by minute

Van: 61-75 (7 goals). Alashkert: 0-15 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Armenian Premier League: 2.53 goals per match, BTTS 45%, Over 2.5 47%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict an away win (Alashkert). The visitors have a clear offensive and form advantage: Alashkert have scored 39 goals this season versus Van's 26 (difference 13), and in the last 5 matches they have scored 11 goals and remain unbeaten, while Van have scored only 3 and lost 3 of their last 5. Alashkert generate more high-quality chances — on average 4.17 shots on target and 11.08 attempts per match and xG 1.36 away, while Van average 3.54 on target, 10.69 attempts and xG 1.20 at home; additionally the visitors’ shot conversion is 15% versus the hosts’ 12%. Defensively Alashkert concede 1.25 goals away and 23 goals this season versus Van’s 1.38 and 37 goals conceded, giving the visitors roughly a 14-goal advantage in goal differential; their last 5 matches yield on average 2.2 points per game versus Van’s 1.2. Considering these figures I assess the probabilities as: away 60%, draw 25%, home 15%.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal stats show a large asymmetry: Van has a BTTS rate of 31%, while Alashkert sits at 75%, yielding a simple mean of 53% in favor of BTTS. In the last 5 matches Van records only 20% BTTS and averages 0.6 goals per game, whereas Alashkert has 80% BTTS and averages 2.2 goals (11 goals in the last 5), so the visitors are clearly more offensively active. Van does, however, have a high home clean sheet rate of 54% and a seasonal average of 0.62 goals conceded, but their last 5 matches show increased vulnerability: average xG against of 1.79 and 6 goals conceded in those 5 games. Alashkert have scored 39 goals this season, have an average xG for of 1.36 and a seasonal clean sheet rate of only 8%, indicating they often concede while regularly scoring. Considering Alashkert’s strong scoring form (80% BTTS in L5, 2.2 goals L5) and Van’s susceptibility in xG against, I assess BTTS at 65% (Yes) vs 35% (No) and recommend a 'BTTS - Yes' bet.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I project a total of 2.50 goals: Van 1.35 and Alashkert 1.15 (calculated from home xG 1.50 and xG against visitors 1.20, and away xG 1.36 and xG against hosts 0.94). Both teams have a high share of matches over 1.5 goals — Van 77% and Alashkert 75% on the season — and the league averages 2.53 goals per match, which supports crossing 1.5. Alashkert have scored 11 goals in their last 5 matches (2.2 per game), while Van have scored 3 (0.6), increasing the likelihood of at least two goals in this fixture. However, Van keep a clean sheet in 54% of matches versus only 8% for Alashkert, so while Over 1.5 goals is the strongest signal, the chance of Over 2.5 remains moderate (~46%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Van led at the break in 54% of home matches, scoring an average of 0.77 goals by half-time and conceding only 0.31, which gives them clear control in the first 45 minutes. Their average xG is 1.50 versus opponents’ xG of 0.94, while Alashkert’s xG is 1.36 against 1.20, so Van generates more high-quality chances and has the better defense. Alashkert, however, are in good form — winning 60% of their last 5 matches and leading at the break in 60% of them, and as the away side they have a high BTTS rate of 75% and as many as 92% of matches with at least one goal after the break, which increases the risk of a turnaround. Considering Van’s 2.0 points per home game, superior xG metrics and Van’s strong Half-Time performance, the most likely scenario is Van leading at the break and ultimately winning the match (1/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

48Possession (%)52
VanAlashkert
4Shots9
VanAlashkert
1Shots on target2
VanAlashkert
0.61xG1.08
VanAlashkert
1Corners9
VanAlashkert
37Dangerous attacks51
VanAlashkert
8Fouls11
VanAlashkert
2Cards2
VanAlashkert

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.04Goals scored / match1.56
VanAlashkert
1.48Goals conceded / match0.92
VanAlashkert
45%Average possession53%
VanAlashkert
3.28Shots on target / match4.52
VanAlashkert

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.28Shots per match11.32
VanAlashkert
3.28Shots on target4.52
VanAlashkert
10.1%Shot conversion13.8%
VanAlashkert
45%Possession53%
VanAlashkert
1.17xG for1.44
VanAlashkert
1.52xG against1.05
VanAlashkert

Shooting quality

Van: BalancedAlashkert: Efficient finishing
VanAlashkert
Accuracy (shots on target)32%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.35

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Alashkert is 83% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Van · 2.2 pts / match - Alashkert

Van
LLLWW
Season result split
36% W16% R48% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-4-12
1.24 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-3-5
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LDLLW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.07Opponent xG: 1.85BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Alashkert
WWDDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
56% W20% R24% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-5-6
1.88 pts / match · goal difference +16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-3-3
Last 5 away
2-2-1
LDWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.13BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Alashkert is 50% better for: goals scored per match.

1.04 goals / match - Van · 1.56 goals / match - Alashkert

Alashkert is 61% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.48 goals / match - Van · 0.92 goals / match - Alashkert

Van scoring profile: strong

Van scores in 64% of matches (16 of 25 matches), while Alashkert keeps a clean sheet in 32% (8 of 25 matches).

Alashkert scoring profile: very strong

Alashkert scores in 84% of matches (21 of 25 matches), while Van keeps a clean sheet in 24% (6 of 25 matches).

26Goals scored (season)39
VanAlashkert
37Goals conceded (season)23
VanAlashkert
2.52Average goals in match2.48
VanAlashkert
3Goals scored (last 5)11
VanAlashkert
6Goals conceded (last 5)5
VanAlashkert

How often they score at least...

64%1 goal84%
VanAlashkert
28%2 goals52%
VanAlashkert
12%3 goals20%
VanAlashkert
0%4 goals0%
VanAlashkert

How often they concede at least...

76%1 goal68%
VanAlashkert
56%2 goals24%
VanAlashkert
8%3 goals0%
VanAlashkert
4%4 goals0%
VanAlashkert

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time16%
VanAlashkert
4%BTTS in both halves0%
VanAlashkert
20%Scored in both halves36%
VanAlashkert

BTTS and goal count

52%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
VanAlashkert
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
VanAlashkert
20%BTTS - last 580%
VanAlashkert

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

72%Min. 1 goal before half-time76%
VanAlashkert
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time40%
VanAlashkert
8%Min. 3 goals before half-time8%
VanAlashkert

2nd half

72%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
VanAlashkert
40%Min. 2 goals after half-time36%
VanAlashkert
24%Min. 3 goals after half-time4%
VanAlashkert

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Alashkert is 105% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.8 pts / match - Van · 1.64 pts / match - Alashkert

Van - half-time state
12% leading44% draw44% trailing
Alashkert - half-time state
44% leading32% draw24% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.8Points per match (1st half)1.64
VanAlashkert
0.32Goals scored (1st half)0.84
VanAlashkert
0.8Goals conceded (1st half)0.44
VanAlashkert
1.12Average goals (1st half)1.28
VanAlashkert
40%Clean sheet before half-time64%
VanAlashkert
68%No goal before half-time44%
VanAlashkert

After half-time (2nd half)

1.2Points per match (2nd half)1.6
VanAlashkert
0.72Goals scored (2nd half)0.72
VanAlashkert
0.68Goals conceded (2nd half)0.48
VanAlashkert
1.4Average goals (2nd half)1.2
VanAlashkert
48%Clean sheet after half-time60%
VanAlashkert
48%No goal after half-time36%
VanAlashkert

Van - second-half results

28% W36% R36% P
20
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-12
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.80
PPG before half-time
Lead holding300%

Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Alashkert - second-half results

40% W40% R20% P
41
Half-time points
21
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.64
PPG before half-time
Lead holding127%

Leads at half-time in 44% of matches and wins 56%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Van - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.00
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.4
Average goals in match1.20.6
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Alashkert - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.60
Goals scored / match1.01.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.8
Average goals in match1.22.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal20%0%
Goal difference+4+2
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 5

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Van
ScoredConceded
2
6
0-15
1
8
16-30
5
6
31-45
4
4
46-60
7
4
61-75
7
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Alashkert
ScoredConceded
10
1
0-15
5
3
16-30
6
7
31-45
6
4
46-60
6
2
61-75
6
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (10 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.50
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
52%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-20%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
54%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Van

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.35
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+6.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
74%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
132%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Alashkert

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.39
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
139%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
65%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.32
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 26% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Armenian Premier League).

Teams vs league

VanLigaAlashkert
Average goals in match 2.522.53 2.48
Both teams scored 52%45% 52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 56%47% 44%
Clean sheets 24%32% 32%
Goal before half-time 72%70% 76%
Goal after half-time 72%79% 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.53
Average goals per match
45%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
32%
Clean sheets
1.41
Home goals / match
1.12
Away goals / match
+26%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. AlashkertYellow cardYaroslav Matyukhin
  2. AlashkertGoalKaren Nalbandyan
  3. VanSubstitutionOn: Jonel DesireOff: Narek Manukyan
  4. AlashkertSubstitutionOn: Edgar PiloyanOff: Yuri Gareginyan
  5. AlashkertSubstitutionOn: Ifeanyi David NdukaOff: Momo Fanyé Touré
  6. AlashkertYellow cardArsen Beglaryan

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Henrik NalbandyanMatches officiated: 13
4.54Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 215%Home wins46%Draws38%Away wins

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Van 0 - 0 - 2 Alashkert. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Alashkert FC
1 : 0
FK Van
FK Van
1 : 2
Alashkert FC

FAQ

What was the result of Van vs Alashkert?

The Armenian Premier League match finished Van 0:1 Alashkert. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Van and Alashkert?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Van won 0, Alashkert won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Van vs Alashkert?

Van score 1.04 goals per game on average and Alashkert 1.56. The Armenian Premier League average is 2.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 52% of Van's matches and 52% of Alashkert's.

What form are Van and Alashkert in?

Over the last 5 games Van have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Alashkert 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Van vs Alashkert?

The statistical background for Van vs Alashkert — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.