Vancouver FC vs Cavalry FC: match statistics
Vancouver FC vs Cavalry FC: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Vancouver FC played Cavalry FC in Canadian Premier League (Canada). The match was played on 25 July 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Current form
Vancouver FC: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Cavalry FC: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Vancouver FC scores 1.54 and concedes 1.15 goals per match. Cavalry FC scores 1.92 and concedes 0.50. League average: 2.94 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Vancouver FC 54%, Cavalry FC 42%. Over 2.5: Vancouver FC 46%, Cavalry FC 42%. League level: BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 54%.
xG, shots and style
Cavalry FC has higher xG: 1.69 vs 1.52. Vancouver FC: 13.4 shots per match, Cavalry FC: 15.0.
Match halves
Vancouver FC: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.69. Cavalry FC: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 1.17.
Goals by minute
Vancouver FC: 31-45+ (6 goals). Cavalry FC: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Canadian Premier League: 2.94 goals per match, BTTS 62%, Over 2.5 54%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 5 previous H2H matches were available: 0-3-2. Average goals 3.40, BTTS 60%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Cavalry FC are the favorites for this match: the visitors have 8 wins this season versus Vancouver’s 5, and on the road they score 1.86 goals per game compared to the hosts’ 1.29 at home. Cavalry’s key advantage is defence — they concede only 0.43 goals on average away (vs 1.00 conceded by Vancouver at home) and keep clean sheets in 57% of away games versus 14% for the hosts. In terms of quality of chances, xG for both teams is almost identical (Vancouver xG 1.52 at home vs Cavalry xG 1.51 away), but Cavalry register more shots on target (5.57 vs 4.43) and have a higher shot conversion rate 14% vs Vancouver’s 10%, which increases their efficiency. In the last 5 matches Vancouver scored 13 goals but conceded 8 and average 1.2 points per game, while Cavalry have 11 goals in those five fixtures and 1.6 points per game, showing better conversion of chances into points by the visitors. Considering the superior win rate (71% away wins for the visitors vs 43% home wins for the hosts), defensive edge and higher number of shots on target, I predict a Cavalry victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest signal for BTTS comes from the last 5 matches: both teams have BTTS at 80% in that sample. In those 5 fixtures Vancouver averaged 2.6 goals scored and 1.6 conceded, while Cavalry averaged 2.2 scored and 1.4 conceded, clearly pointing to a pattern of goal exchange. On the season Cavalry concede only 0.43 goals on average and have 57% clean sheets (Vancouver 0.6 and 40%), but their xG against of 1.32 is significantly higher than actual goals conceded, suggesting they may have been fortunate so far and there is a risk of conceding more. Additionally Vancouver generate xG 1.9 and average 18 shots per game, while Cavalry have a shot conversion rate of 14% and 1.86 goals away, so both sides create chances and can convert; combined with the league BTTS average of 61% the optimal pick is BTTS - Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Expected goals are 1.61 for Vancouver and 1.21 for Cavalry (total 2.82), calculated from xG: Vancouver xG_for 1.90 vs Cavalry defense xG_against 1.32, and Cavalry xG_for 1.51 vs Vancouver defense xG_against 0.90. Form over the last 5 matches favors increased scoring — Vancouver scored 13 goals in the last 5 (avg 2.6), Cavalry 11 goals (avg 2.2), and over 2.5 % in the last 5 is 100% for Vancouver and 60% for Cavalry. Seasonal metrics are mixed: seasonally Vancouver has 40% of matches over 2.5, Cavalry 43%, while Vancouver has 100% of matches over 1.5 and Cavalry 57%, which boosts the probability of over 1.5/2.5. On the other hand Cavalry’s defense is strong (57% clean sheets and only 6 goals conceded this season), so the chance of a very high score above 3.5 is limited (season Over35 20% and 14%). As a result I recommend a bet on Over 2.5 as the strongest signal (model: over2.5 ~72% vs under 28%), while Over 1.5 is almost certain (~94%) and Over 3.5 remains risky (~28%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a Vancouver win at full-time (X/1). Vancouver drew at half-time in 4 of their 5 home matches (drawingAtHT_home 80%), and the average goals by half are hosts 0.8 and visitors 0.86 (AVGHT_home 0.8, AVGHT_away 0.86), so the first 45 minutes typically yield around 1.66 goals. After the break Vancouver averages 1.4 goals scored and only 0.4 conceded (scored_2hg_avg_home 1.4, conceded_2hg_avg_home 0.4), while also winning 60% of home matches (winPercentage_home 60%), indicating a strong second-half performance. Cavalry have a high win rate of 71% and led at the break in 43% of games (winPercentage_away 71%, leadingAtHTPercentage_away 43%), but the visitors’ xG is 1.51 versus Vancouver’s 1.9 (xg_for_avg_away 1.51, xg_for_avg_home 1.9), so the hosts create more chances and are likelier to effect a turnaround after a half-time draw.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Vancouver FC | Cavalry FC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Vancouver FC is 20% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / match - Vancouver FC · 2 pts / match - Cavalry FC
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Cavalry FC is 25% better for: goals scored per match.
1.54 goals / match - Vancouver FC · 1.92 goals / match - Cavalry FC
Cavalry FC is 130% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.15 goals / match - Vancouver FC · 0.5 goals / match - Cavalry FC
Vancouver FC scores in 62% of matches (8 of 13 matches), while Cavalry FC keeps a clean sheet in 50% (6 of 12 matches).
Cavalry FC scores in 83% of matches (10 of 12 matches), while Vancouver FC keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 13 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Vancouver FC
Over / Under - Cavalry FC
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Vancouver FC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Cavalry FC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 2.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +9 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Vancouver FC
Cavalry FC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Canadian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Vancouver FC | Liga | Cavalry FC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.69 | 2.94 | ▼ 2.42 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 54% | 62% | ▼ 42% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 46% | 54% | ▼ 42% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 8% | 20% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 54% | 58% | ▼ 42% |
| Goal after half-time | • 85% | 86% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (5): Vancouver FC 0 - 3 - 2 Cavalry FC. Average goals 3.40, both teams scored in 60% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Vancouver FC vs Cavalry FC?
The Canadian Premier League match finished Vancouver FC 1:0 Cavalry FC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Vancouver FC and Cavalry FC?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Vancouver FC won 0, Cavalry FC won 2 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 3.40 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Vancouver FC vs Cavalry FC?
Vancouver FC score 1.54 goals per game on average and Cavalry FC 1.92. The Canadian Premier League average is 2.94 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 54% of Vancouver FC's matches and 42% of Cavalry FC's.
What form are Vancouver FC and Cavalry FC in?
Over the last 5 games Vancouver FC have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Cavalry FC 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Vancouver FC vs Cavalry FC?
The statistical background for Vancouver FC vs Cavalry FC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


