Portugal - Liga 3Data current as of 23 July 2026

Varzim vs CD Trofense: match statistics

Varzim crest
Varzim
2 : 0half-time 2:0
CD Trofense crest
CD Trofense
155%(2.02)
X30%(3.27)
215%(3.42)

Varzim is in excellent form, winning four of their last five matches and averaging 2.4 points per game. At home, they boast an impressive 50% win rate with just 10% losses, scoring an average of 1.7 goals and conceding only 0.8 per match. CD Trofense is showing weaker form with only one win in their last five games and averaging just 1.0 point per match. Away from home, the visitors have a high draw percentage (56%), but their average xG (1.05) is significantly lower than Varzim's (1.48), indicating lesser offensive potential. The goal difference of both teams (+9 for Varzim at home vs +5 for Trofense away) and the hosts' higher chance conversion (15% vs 19%, but with a higher shot volume) point towards a Varzim victory, although the guests' solid defense (44% clean sheets) could make this a closely-fought contest.

Varzim vs CD Trofense: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Varzim play CD Trofense in Liga 3 (Portugal). The match date is 21 February 2026 at 18:30. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Varzim: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. CD Trofense: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Varzim scores 1.22 and concedes 1.13 goals per match. CD Trofense scores 0.94 and concedes 0.97. League average: 2.23 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Varzim 47%, CD Trofense 47%. Over 2.5: Varzim 44%, CD Trofense 31%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 40%.

xG, shots and style

Varzim has higher xG: 1.28 vs 1.14. Varzim: 9.8 shots per match, CD Trofense: 7.7.

Match halves

Varzim: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.63. CD Trofense: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.41.

Goals by minute

Varzim: 76-90+ (12 goals). CD Trofense: 16-30 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Liga 3: 2.23 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 40%.

Head-to-head

3 H2H matches: 1-0-2. Average goals 1.67, BTTS 33%.

Match description

Varzim is in excellent form, winning four of their last five matches and averaging 2.4 points per game. At home, they boast an impressive 50% win rate with just 10% losses, scoring an average of 1.7 goals and conceding only 0.8 per match. CD Trofense is showing weaker form with only one win in their last five games and averaging just 1.0 point per match. Away from home, the visitors have a high draw percentage (56%), but their average xG (1.05) is significantly lower than Varzim's (1.48), indicating lesser offensive potential. The goal difference of both teams (+9 for Varzim at home vs +5 for Trofense away) and the hosts' higher chance conversion (15% vs 19%, but with a higher shot volume) point towards a Varzim victory, although the guests' solid defense (44% clean sheets) could make this a closely-fought contest.

Half-by-half

2 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

39Possession (%)61
VarzimCD Trofense
8Shots9
VarzimCD Trofense
7Shots on target3
VarzimCD Trofense
1.21xG1.22
VarzimCD Trofense
2Corners7
VarzimCD Trofense
28Dangerous attacks60
VarzimCD Trofense
-1Fouls-1
VarzimCD Trofense
2Cards1
VarzimCD Trofense

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.22Goals scored / match0.94
VarzimCD Trofense
1.13Goals conceded / match0.97
VarzimCD Trofense
49%Average possession51%
VarzimCD Trofense
3.72Shots on target / match3.19
VarzimCD Trofense

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.81Shots per match7.72
VarzimCD Trofense
3.72Shots on target3.19
VarzimCD Trofense
12.4%Shot conversion12.1%
VarzimCD Trofense
49%Possession51%
VarzimCD Trofense
1.28xG for1.14
VarzimCD Trofense
1.33xG against1.26
VarzimCD Trofense

Shooting quality

Varzim: BalancedCD Trofense: Balanced
VarzimCD Trofense
Accuracy (shots on target)38%41%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.15
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Varzim is 150% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Varzim · 0.4 pts / match - CD Trofense

Varzim
WDLLD
Season result split
34% W28% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
11-9-12
1.31 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-5-4
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LWLDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.26Opponent xG: 1.47BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
CD Trofense
LLDDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
28% W34% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-11-12
1.19 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-6-4
Last 5 away
2-0-3
LWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.05Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Varzim is 30% better for: goals scored per match.

1.22 goals / match - Varzim · 0.94 goals / match - CD Trofense

CD Trofense is 16% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.13 goals / match - Varzim · 0.97 goals / match - CD Trofense

Varzim scoring profile: strong

Varzim scores in 66% of matches (21 of 32 matches), while CD Trofense keeps a clean sheet in 25% (8 of 32 matches).

CD Trofense scoring profile: strong

CD Trofense scores in 56% of matches (18 of 32 matches), while Varzim keeps a clean sheet in 25% (8 of 32 matches).

39Goals scored (season)30
VarzimCD Trofense
36Goals conceded (season)31
VarzimCD Trofense
2.34Average goals in match1.91
VarzimCD Trofense
6Goals scored (last 5)1
VarzimCD Trofense
7Goals conceded (last 5)6
VarzimCD Trofense

How often they score at least...

66%1 goal56%
VarzimCD Trofense
41%2 goals22%
VarzimCD Trofense
13%3 goals6%
VarzimCD Trofense
3%4 goals6%
VarzimCD Trofense

How often they concede at least...

75%1 goal75%
VarzimCD Trofense
28%2 goals19%
VarzimCD Trofense
9%3 goals3%
VarzimCD Trofense
0%4 goals0%
VarzimCD Trofense

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

19%BTTS at half-time19%
VarzimCD Trofense
9%BTTS in both halves3%
VarzimCD Trofense
28%Scored in both halves16%
VarzimCD Trofense

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS28%
VarzimCD Trofense
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
VarzimCD Trofense
60%BTTS - last 520%
VarzimCD Trofense

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

69%Min. 1 goal before half-time66%
VarzimCD Trofense
34%Min. 2 goals before half-time31%
VarzimCD Trofense
13%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
VarzimCD Trofense

2nd half

78%Min. 1 goal after half-time63%
VarzimCD Trofense
31%Min. 2 goals after half-time19%
VarzimCD Trofense
6%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
VarzimCD Trofense

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

CD Trofense is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.25 pts / match - Varzim · 1.31 pts / match - CD Trofense

Varzim - half-time state
28% leading41% draw31% trailing
CD Trofense - half-time state
28% leading47% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.25Points per match (1st half)1.31
VarzimCD Trofense
0.59Goals scored (1st half)0.53
VarzimCD Trofense
0.56Goals conceded (1st half)0.5
VarzimCD Trofense
1.16Average goals (1st half)1.03
VarzimCD Trofense
53%Clean sheet before half-time56%
VarzimCD Trofense
59%No goal before half-time59%
VarzimCD Trofense

After half-time (2nd half)

1.31Points per match (2nd half)1.06
VarzimCD Trofense
0.63Goals scored (2nd half)0.41
VarzimCD Trofense
0.56Goals conceded (2nd half)0.47
VarzimCD Trofense
1.19Average goals (2nd half)0.88
VarzimCD Trofense
47%Clean sheet after half-time53%
VarzimCD Trofense
47%No goal after half-time69%
VarzimCD Trofense

Varzim - second-half results

28% W47% R25% P
40
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.25
PPG before half-time
Lead holding121%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 34%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

CD Trofense - second-half results

19% W50% R31% P
42
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.31
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Varzim - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.00
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.8
Average goals in match1.21.4
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
CD Trofense - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.40
Goals scored / match0.20.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match0.80.6
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal80%100%
Goal difference-2-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Varzim
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
8
2
16-30
7
12
31-45
2
7
46-60
6
6
61-75
12
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

CD Trofense
ScoredConceded
5
4
0-15
6
8
16-30
6
4
31-45
5
5
46-60
2
4
61-75
6
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.13
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
47%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-21%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
37%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
15%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 7 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Varzim

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.14
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.31
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 10% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

CD Trofense

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.12
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.29
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
90%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
82%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.79
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga 3).

Teams vs league

VarzimLigaCD Trofense
Average goals in match 2.342.23 1.91
Both teams scored 47%49% 47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 44%40% 31%
Clean sheets 25%31% 25%
Goal before half-time 69%66% 66%
Goal after half-time 78%74% 63%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.23
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
31%
Clean sheets
1.19
Home goals / match
1.04
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
66%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): Varzim 1 - 0 - 2 CD Trofense. Average goals 1.67, both teams scored in 33% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Varzim vs CD Trofense?

The Liga 3 match finished Varzim 2:0 CD Trofense. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Varzim and CD Trofense?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Varzim won 1, CD Trofense won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Varzim vs CD Trofense?

Varzim score 1.22 goals per game on average and CD Trofense 0.94. The Liga 3 average is 2.23 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 40% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Varzim's matches and 47% of CD Trofense's.

What form are Varzim and CD Trofense in?

Over the last 5 games Varzim have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and CD Trofense 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Varzim vs CD Trofense?

The statistical background for Varzim vs CD Trofense — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.