Brazil - Serie AEstádio Club de Regatas Vasco da GamaData current as of 15 October 2026

Vasco da Gama vs Remo: match statistics

Vasco da Gama crest
Vasco da Gama
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Remo crest
Remo

Vasco da Gama vs Remo: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Vasco da Gama played Remo in Serie A (Brazil). The match was played on 10 October 2026. Venue: Estádio Club de Regatas Vasco da Gama. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Vasco da Gama: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Remo: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Vasco da Gama scores 1.29 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Remo scores 1.14 and concedes 1.66. League average: 2.67 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Vasco da Gama 64%, Remo 62%. Over 2.5: Vasco da Gama 61%, Remo 52%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 52%.

xG, shots and style

Vasco da Gama has higher xG: 1.90 vs 1.36. Vasco da Gama: 17.9 shots per match, Remo: 12.9.

Match halves

Vasco da Gama: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.93. Remo: half-time lead 10%, second-half goals 0.66.

Goals by minute

Vasco da Gama: 76-90+ (12 goals). Remo: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Serie A: 2.67 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 52%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Vasco da Gama come into this match having won 3 of their last 5 games, scoring 9 goals and conceding just 2; Remo have lost all 5 matches in that span, conceding 10 goals. Home advantage is clear: the hosts have won 50% of their home matches, while the visitors have lost 64% of their away games. Vasco also create significantly more chances, averaging 20.36 shots and an xG of 2.19 at home, compared with Remo’s 11.43 shots and an xG of 1.19 away from home. Although the hosts average 1.5 goals at home against an xG of 2.19, Remo concede an average of 2 goals away and keep a clean sheet in just 7% of matches. These figures point to a Vasco win, despite their own defence conceding an average of 1.29 goals per home match.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The seasonal rates of both teams scoring are 64% for Vasco and 57% for Remo, but the hosts’ recent form weakens that signal: they conceded just 2 goals across their last five matches, and both teams scored in only 20% of those games. Remo average 1.0 goal per match and have failed to score in 43% of their fixtures, increasing the risk that they will not breach Vasco’s defence. The hosts, meanwhile, have a clear chance of scoring, having averaged 1.8 goals across their last five matches, while Remo conceded 2.0 per game. Although both teams scored in 80% of Remo’s last five appearances, Vasco’s stronger recent defensive record points to a slight edge for BTTS - No, meaning at least one team is expected not to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals: this line has been cleared in 79% of Vasco’s matches and 86% of Remo’s. The hosts average 1.29 goals scored, while Remo concede 2.00; across their last five matches, Vasco scored 1.8 goals on average and Remo conceded 2.0. Vasco’s advantage is also supported by chance-creation data: their xG stands at 1.44, compared with the 1.67 xG conceded by the visitors. Remo’s attacking potential is less reliable, as they have failed to score in 43% of matches, making Over 2.5 goals less compelling despite a forecast of 2.70 total goals. The 1.5 line therefore offers a clearer signal than higher totals, without requiring both teams to produce a clinical performance.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely HT/FT outcome is a draw at half-time followed by a Vasco da Gama win: the hosts were level at the break in 64% of their matches this season, while Remo were level at half-time in 60% of their last five. The opening stages could also be closely contested because Vasco averaged 0.6 goals before the break across their last five matches, while Remo conceded just 0.2 in that period. The hosts should gain the upper hand after the interval: over the same period, they averaged 1.2 goals in second halves, while Remo conceded 1.8. Vasco have won three of their last five matches, whereas Remo have lost all five, strengthening the case for a home win despite a possible draw at the break. Vasco’s attacking edge is also reflected in their average xG of 1.44, compared with Remo’s 1.19.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

63Possession (%)37
Vasco da GamaRemo
17Shots9
Vasco da GamaRemo
5Shots on target3
Vasco da GamaRemo
1.73xG1
Vasco da GamaRemo
6Corners5
Vasco da GamaRemo
42Dangerous attacks29
Vasco da GamaRemo
19Fouls15
Vasco da GamaRemo
2Cards2
Vasco da GamaRemo

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.29Goals scored / match1.14
Vasco da GamaRemo
1.5Goals conceded / match1.66
Vasco da GamaRemo
54%Average possession44%
Vasco da GamaRemo
5.46Shots on target / match3.93
Vasco da GamaRemo

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

17.93Shots per match12.86
Vasco da GamaRemo
5.46Shots on target3.93
Vasco da GamaRemo
7.2%Shot conversion8.8%
Vasco da GamaRemo
54%Possession44%
Vasco da GamaRemo
1.9xG for1.36
Vasco da GamaRemo
1.28xG against1.61
Vasco da GamaRemo

Shooting quality

Vasco da Gama: AttackingRemo: Balanced
Vasco da GamaRemo
Accuracy (shots on target)30%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.240.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Vasco da Gama is 1100% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / match - Vasco da Gama · 0.2 pts / match - Remo

Vasco da Gama
WLWWW
Season result split
32% W25% D43% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-7-12
1.21 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-2-5
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LDLWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 2.30Opponent xG: 1.10BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Remo
LLLLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
17% W31% D52% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-9-15
0.83 pts / match · goal difference -15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-3-9
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.83Opponent xG: 1.71BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Vasco da Gama is 13% better for: goals scored per match.

1.29 goals / match - Vasco da Gama · 1.14 goals / match - Remo

Vasco da Gama is 11% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.5 goals / match - Vasco da Gama · 1.66 goals / match - Remo

Vasco da Gama scoring profile: very strong

Vasco da Gama scores in 71% of matches (20 of 28 matches), while Remo keeps a clean sheet in 10% (3 of 29 matches).

Remo scoring profile: very strong

Remo scores in 69% of matches (20 of 29 matches), while Vasco da Gama keeps a clean sheet in 11% (3 of 28 matches).

36Goals scored (season)33
Vasco da GamaRemo
42Goals conceded (season)48
Vasco da GamaRemo
2.79Average goals in match2.79
Vasco da GamaRemo
12Goals scored (last 5)5
Vasco da GamaRemo
4Goals conceded (last 5)9
Vasco da GamaRemo

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal69%
Vasco da GamaRemo
36%2 goals31%
Vasco da GamaRemo
14%3 goals10%
Vasco da GamaRemo
4%4 goals3%
Vasco da GamaRemo

How often they concede at least...

89%1 goal90%
Vasco da GamaRemo
36%2 goals55%
Vasco da GamaRemo
18%3 goals17%
Vasco da GamaRemo
7%4 goals3%
Vasco da GamaRemo

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

60%
League average

Goal patterns

11%BTTS at half-time31%
Vasco da GamaRemo
0%BTTS in both halves7%
Vasco da GamaRemo
11%Scored in both halves17%
Vasco da GamaRemo

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS45%
Vasco da GamaRemo
11%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
Vasco da GamaRemo
60%BTTS - last 580%
Vasco da GamaRemo

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time76%
Vasco da GamaRemo
18%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
Vasco da GamaRemo
4%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
Vasco da GamaRemo

2nd half

79%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
Vasco da GamaRemo
57%Min. 2 goals after half-time45%
Vasco da GamaRemo
32%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
Vasco da GamaRemo

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Vasco da Gama is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Vasco da Gama · 0.83 pts / match - Remo

Vasco da Gama - half-time state
21% leading36% draw43% trailing
Remo - half-time state
10% leading52% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)0.83
Vasco da GamaRemo
0.36Goals scored (1st half)0.48
Vasco da GamaRemo
0.57Goals conceded (1st half)0.79
Vasco da GamaRemo
0.93Average goals (1st half)1.28
Vasco da GamaRemo
46%Clean sheet before half-time34%
Vasco da GamaRemo
71%No goal before half-time59%
Vasco da GamaRemo

After half-time (2nd half)

1.29Points per match (2nd half)1.14
Vasco da GamaRemo
0.93Goals scored (2nd half)0.66
Vasco da GamaRemo
0.93Goals conceded (2nd half)0.86
Vasco da GamaRemo
1.86Average goals (2nd half)1.52
Vasco da GamaRemo
39%Clean sheet after half-time45%
Vasco da GamaRemo
46%No goal after half-time55%
Vasco da GamaRemo

Vasco da Gama - second-half results

32% W32% D36% L
28
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding152%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Remo - second-half results

28% W31% D41% L
24
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.83
PPG before half-time
Lead holding170%

Leads at half-time in 10% of matches and wins 17%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Vasco da Gama - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.00
Goals scored / match0.81.6
Goals conceded / match0.20.6
Average goals in match1.02.2
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+3+5
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
Remo - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.80
Goals scored / match0.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.41.4
Average goals in match0.42.4
1 goal40%100%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal100%20%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Vasco da Gama
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
4
5
16-30
5
7
31-45
8
8
46-60
6
8
61-75
12
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

Remo
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
2
10
16-30
7
10
31-45
4
10
46-60
4
4
61-75
11
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.79
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
105%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-28%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
49%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
9%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 11 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Vasco da Gama

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.62
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.83
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.61
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
84%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
132%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+1.19
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.6
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Remo

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.27
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.22
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
100%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
108%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.63
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Serie A).

Teams vs league

Vasco da GamaLigaRemo
Average goals in match▲ 2.792.67▲ 2.79
Both teams scored▲ 64%60%▲ 62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 61%52%• 52%
Clean sheets▼ 11%23%▼ 10%
Goal before half-time▼ 71%75%• 76%
Goal after half-time• 79%79%• 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.67
Average goals per match
60%
Both teams scored
52%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.53
Home goals / match
1.14
Away goals / match
+34%
Home attack advantage
+25%
Home defence advantage
+22%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Vasco da GamaYellow cardAlan Gabriel Saldivia Vázquez
  2. Vasco da GamaSubstitutionOn: Arilson Edgardeline Fernandes CamatiOff: Facundo Colidio
  3. Vasco da GamaYellow cardJair Rodrigues Júnior
  4. Vasco da GamaSubstitutionOn: Santiago SosaOff: Jair Rodrigues Júnior
  5. RemoYellow cardMarcelo Rangel Rosa

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Vasco da Gama 0 - 1 - 0 Remo. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Vasco da Gama vs Remo?

The Serie A match finished Vasco da Gama 0:0 Remo. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Vasco da Gama vs Remo?

Vasco da Gama score 1.29 goals per game on average and Remo 1.14. The Serie A average is 2.67 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Vasco da Gama's matches and 62% of Remo's.

What form are Vasco da Gama and Remo in?

Over the last 5 games Vasco da Gama have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Remo 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Vasco da Gama vs Remo?

The statistical background for Vasco da Gama vs Remo — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.