Ukraine - Ukrainian Premier LeagueData current as of 31 October 2026

Veres vs Chornomorets: match statistics

Veres crest
Veres
1 : 3half-time 1:2
Chornomorets crest
Chornomorets

Veres vs Chornomorets: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Veres played Chornomorets in Ukrainian Premier League (Ukraine). The match was played on 31 October 2026. Final score: 1:3.

Current form

Veres: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Chornomorets: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Veres scores 0.60 and concedes 1.30 goals per match. Chornomorets scores 0.56 and concedes 1.22. League average: 2.39 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Veres 40%, Chornomorets 44%. Over 2.5: Veres 30%, Chornomorets 33%. League level: BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 51%.

xG, shots and style

Veres has higher xG: 0.87 vs 0.82. Veres: 6.3 shots per match, Chornomorets: 6.3.

Match halves

Veres: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.50. Chornomorets: half-time lead 11%, second-half goals 0.22.

Goals by minute

Veres: 46-60 (2 goals). Chornomorets: 31-45+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ukrainian Premier League: 2.39 goals per match, BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 51%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Veres have home advantage, although they have won just 1 of their last 5 matches and have claimed victory in only 20% of their home games. Chornomorets have failed to win any of their last 5 matches and have lost all 3 of their away fixtures so far. The hosts average 0.8 goals per game at home with an xG of 0.87, while the visitors manage just 0.33 goals away from home with an xG of 0.50 and have failed to score in 67% of those matches. Veres concede an average of 1.39 xG at home, compared with Chornomorets' 1.74 away, increasing the hosts' chances of creating better opportunities. Both teams' poor finishing limits confidence in the prediction, but Chornomorets' away struggles point to Veres.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest case for BTTS - No is Chornomorets' poor attack: away from home, they score an average of 0.33 goals, record an xG of 0.50, and have failed to score in 67% of matches. Veres keep a clean sheet in 50% of their home games, further reducing the visitors' chances of scoring. Although Chornomorets concede an average of 2.00 goals away from home and Veres 0.83 at home, a goal from the hosts alone would not be enough for a BTTS - Yes bet to land. Both teams have averaged 0.6 goals per game across their last five matches, so despite recent BTTS rates of 40% for Veres and 60% for Chornomorets, it is more likely that at least one team will fail to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest signal points to Under 3.5 goals: this line has not been breached in any of Veres’s home matches or Chornomorets’s away matches. The hosts average 0.67 goals at home, while the visitors score just 0.33 on the road, limiting the chances of a high-scoring game despite Chornomorets’s weaker defence. The visitors concede an average of 2.0 goals away from home, but their attacking xG is just 0.50 compared with Veres’s 0.98, meaning the hosts account for the larger share of the expected 2.10 goals. In both sets of matches, 67% finished Under 2.5 goals, so the 3.5 line provides additional protection against a three-goal outcome.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A half-time draw looks most likely: Veres were level at the break in 4 of their 6 home matches, while both teams averaged just 0.33 goals in the first half. The hosts could gain the upper hand after the break, as Chornomorets have lost all 3 of their away matches, conceding an average of 2.0 goals per game. Veres also have the edge in shots on target at home — 2.33 compared with the visitors’ 0.67 away — and in xG, at 0.98 versus 0.50. However, the X/1 pick is far from certain: Veres have won only 1 of their 6 home matches, and they have been behind at half-time in each of their last 5 games. Even so, Chornomorets’ poor away form and their failure to score after the break in their away matches so far suggest that the hosts have the best chance of turning a closely contested start in their favour.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 2
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
VeresChornomorets
4Shots12
VeresChornomorets
3Shots on target4
VeresChornomorets
0.77xG1.25
VeresChornomorets
5Corners3
VeresChornomorets
40Dangerous attacks29
VeresChornomorets
-1Fouls-1
VeresChornomorets
3Cards1
VeresChornomorets

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.6Goals scored / match0.56
VeresChornomorets
1.3Goals conceded / match1.22
VeresChornomorets
43%Average possession44%
VeresChornomorets
2.8Shots on target / match1.78
VeresChornomorets

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.3Shots per match6.33
VeresChornomorets
2.8Shots on target1.78
VeresChornomorets
9.5%Shot conversion8.8%
VeresChornomorets
43%Possession44%
VeresChornomorets
0.87xG for0.82
VeresChornomorets
1.34xG against1.43
VeresChornomorets

Shooting quality

Veres: BalancedChornomorets: Balanced
VeresChornomorets
Accuracy (shots on target)44%28%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.210.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Veres is 100% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Veres · 0.4 pts / match - Chornomorets

Veres
DWLLL
Season result split
20% W30% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-3-5
0.90 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-1-3
Last 5 at home
1-1-3
LDWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.05Opponent xG: 1.38BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Chornomorets
LDLLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
11% W33% D56% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-3-5
0.67 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-3
Last 5 away
0-0-3
LLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 0.91Opponent xG: 1.55BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Veres is 7% better for: goals scored per match.

0.6 goals / match - Veres · 0.56 goals / match - Chornomorets

Chornomorets is 7% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.3 goals / match - Veres · 1.22 goals / match - Chornomorets

Veres scoring profile: mixed

Veres scores in 50% of matches (5 of 10 matches), while Chornomorets keeps a clean sheet in 33% (3 of 9 matches).

Chornomorets scoring profile: strong

Chornomorets scores in 56% of matches (5 of 9 matches), while Veres keeps a clean sheet in 20% (2 of 10 matches).

6Goals scored (season)5
VeresChornomorets
13Goals conceded (season)11
VeresChornomorets
1.9Average goals in match1.78
VeresChornomorets
3Goals scored (last 5)3
VeresChornomorets
9Goals conceded (last 5)7
VeresChornomorets

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal56%
VeresChornomorets
10%2 goals0%
VeresChornomorets
0%3 goals0%
VeresChornomorets
0%4 goals0%
VeresChornomorets

How often they concede at least...

80%1 goal67%
VeresChornomorets
40%2 goals56%
VeresChornomorets
10%3 goals0%
VeresChornomorets
0%4 goals0%
VeresChornomorets

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

10%BTTS at half-time22%
VeresChornomorets
0%BTTS in both halves0%
VeresChornomorets
0%Scored in both halves0%
VeresChornomorets

BTTS and goal count

20%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
VeresChornomorets
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
VeresChornomorets
40%BTTS - last 560%
VeresChornomorets

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

70%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
VeresChornomorets
10%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
VeresChornomorets
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
VeresChornomorets

2nd half

80%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
VeresChornomorets
30%Min. 2 goals after half-time11%
VeresChornomorets
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
VeresChornomorets

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Chornomorets is 123% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.4 pts / match - Veres · 0.89 pts / match - Chornomorets

Veres - half-time state
0% leading40% draw60% trailing
Chornomorets - half-time state
11% leading56% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.4Points per match (1st half)0.89
VeresChornomorets
0.1Goals scored (1st half)0.33
VeresChornomorets
0.7Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
VeresChornomorets
0.8Average goals (1st half)1
VeresChornomorets
30%Clean sheet before half-time44%
VeresChornomorets
90%No goal before half-time67%
VeresChornomorets

After half-time (2nd half)

1.2Points per match (2nd half)0.78
VeresChornomorets
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.22
VeresChornomorets
0.6Goals conceded (2nd half)0.56
VeresChornomorets
1.1Average goals (2nd half)0.78
VeresChornomorets
50%Clean sheet after half-time44%
VeresChornomorets
60%No goal after half-time78%
VeresChornomorets

Veres - second-half results

30% W30% D40% L
4
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.40
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Chornomorets - second-half results

11% W44% D44% L
8
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.89
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 11% of matches and wins 11%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Veres - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.001.20
Goals scored / match0.00.6
Goals conceded / match1.00.8
Average goals in match1.01.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet0%40%
No goal100%60%
Goal difference-5-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 0% draw - 100% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Chornomorets - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.60
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.6
Average goals in match1.20.8
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-2-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Veres
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
1
2
16-30
0
4
31-45
2
2
46-60
1
1
61-75
2
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Chornomorets
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
0
2
16-30
2
3
31-45
1
3
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.84
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.9 : 0.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
77%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
42%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
28%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
22%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 5 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Veres

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.47
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.23
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
43%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
130%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Chornomorets

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.61
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
56%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ukrainian Premier League).

Teams vs league

VeresLigaChornomorets
Average goals in match▼ 1.902.39▼ 1.78
Both teams scored▼ 40%43%• 44%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 30%51%▼ 33%
Clean sheets▼ 20%37%▼ 33%
Goal before half-time▲ 70%65%▲ 67%
Goal after half-time▲ 80%74%▼ 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.39
Average goals per match
43%
Both teams scored
51%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
37%
Clean sheets
1.39
Home goals / match
1.00
Away goals / match
+39%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defence advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. ChornomoretsGoalVasil KurkoAssist: Giorgi Robakidze
  2. ChornomoretsGoalChristian MbaAssist: Mykola Kogut
  3. VeresYellow cardSemen Vovchenko
  4. VeresYellow cardIhor Kharatin
  5. VeresYellow cardVladislav Sharay
  6. ChornomoretsSubstitutionOn: Andriy KhomaOff: Mykola Kogut
  7. ChornomoretsGoalAndriy KhomaAssist: Giorgi Robakidze
  8. VeresSubstitutionOn: Alagie WallyOff: Rostyslav Baran
  9. ChornomoretsSubstitutionOn: Dmytro KlotsOff: Vasil Kurko
  10. ChornomoretsSubstitutionOn: Jerry Dieu-Merci YokaOff: Christian Mba
  11. ChornomoretsYellow cardMarian Farina

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Veres vs Chornomorets?

The Ukrainian Premier League match finished Veres 1:3 Chornomorets. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Veres vs Chornomorets?

Veres score 0.60 goals per game on average and Chornomorets 0.56. The Ukrainian Premier League average is 2.39 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Veres's matches and 44% of Chornomorets's.

What form are Veres and Chornomorets in?

Over the last 5 games Veres have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Chornomorets 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Veres vs Chornomorets?

The statistical background for Veres vs Chornomorets — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.