Ukraine - Ukrainian Premier LeagueData current as of 15 October 2026

Match suspended or postponed

The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context.

Veres vs Kudrivka: match statistics

Veres vs Kudrivka: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Veres play Kudrivka in Ukrainian Premier League (Ukraine). The match time may change. Statistics remain available as match context.

Current form

Veres: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Kudrivka: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Veres scores 0.67 and concedes 0.83 goals per match. Kudrivka scores 0.67 and concedes 2.67. League average: 2.27 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Veres 50%, Kudrivka 50%. Over 2.5: Veres 17%, Kudrivka 67%. League level: BTTS 37%, Over 2.5 42%.

xG, shots and style

Veres has higher xG: 0.87 vs 0.46. Veres: 6.7 shots per match, Kudrivka: 2.2.

Match halves

Veres: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.50. Kudrivka: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.17.

Goals by minute

Veres: 76-90+ (2 goals). Kudrivka: 31-45+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ukrainian Premier League: 2.27 goals per match, BTTS 37%, Over 2.5 42%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.67Goals scored / match0.67
VeresKudrivka
0.83Goals conceded / match2.67
VeresKudrivka
42%Average possession45%
VeresKudrivka
2.83Shots on target / match0.83
VeresKudrivka

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

6.67Shots per match2.17
VeresKudrivka
2.83Shots on target0.83
VeresKudrivka
10%Shot conversion30.8%
VeresKudrivka
42%Possession45%
VeresKudrivka
0.87xG for0.46
VeresKudrivka
1.19xG against1.19
VeresKudrivka

Shooting quality

Veres: BalancedKudrivka: Counter-attacking
VeresKudrivka
Accuracy (shots on target)42%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.21
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.240.81

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Veres is 200% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Veres · 0.4 pts / match - Kudrivka

Veres
LDWDD
Season result split
17% W50% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-3-2
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-1
Last 5 at home
0-1-1
LD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 0.92Opponent xG: 1.05BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 20%
Kudrivka
DDLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W33% D67% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-2-4
0.33 pts / match · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-2
Last 5 away
0-1-2
LDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 0.50Opponent xG: 0.99BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Veres is 222% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.83 goals / match - Veres · 2.67 goals / match - Kudrivka

Veres scoring profile: strong

Veres scores in 67% of matches (4 of 6 matches), while Kudrivka keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 matches).

Kudrivka scoring profile: mixed

Kudrivka scores in 50% of matches (3 of 6 matches), while Veres keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 matches).

4Goals scored (season)4
VeresKudrivka
5Goals conceded (season)16
VeresKudrivka
1.5Average goals in match3.33
VeresKudrivka
4Goals scored (last 5)3
VeresKudrivka
4Goals conceded (last 5)11
VeresKudrivka

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal50%
VeresKudrivka
0%2 goals17%
VeresKudrivka
0%3 goals0%
VeresKudrivka
0%4 goals0%
VeresKudrivka

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal67%
VeresKudrivka
17%2 goals67%
VeresKudrivka
0%3 goals67%
VeresKudrivka
0%4 goals33%
VeresKudrivka

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time50%
VeresKudrivka
0%BTTS in both halves17%
VeresKudrivka
0%Scored in both halves17%
VeresKudrivka

BTTS and goal count

17%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
VeresKudrivka
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS17%
VeresKudrivka
60%BTTS - last 540%
VeresKudrivka

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

50%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
VeresKudrivka
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
VeresKudrivka
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time33%
VeresKudrivka

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
VeresKudrivka
17%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
VeresKudrivka
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
VeresKudrivka

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Veres is 34% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.67 pts / match - Veres · 0.5 pts / match - Kudrivka

Veres - half-time state
0% leading67% draw33% trailing
Kudrivka - half-time state
0% leading50% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.67Points per match (1st half)0.5
VeresKudrivka
0.17Goals scored (1st half)0.5
VeresKudrivka
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)1
VeresKudrivka
0.67Average goals (1st half)1.5
VeresKudrivka
50%Clean sheet before half-time33%
VeresKudrivka
83%No goal before half-time50%
VeresKudrivka

After half-time (2nd half)

1.5Points per match (2nd half)0.5
VeresKudrivka
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.17
VeresKudrivka
0.33Goals conceded (2nd half)1.67
VeresKudrivka
0.83Average goals (2nd half)1.83
VeresKudrivka
67%Clean sheet after half-time33%
VeresKudrivka
50%No goal after half-time83%
VeresKudrivka

Veres - second-half results

33% W50% D17% L
4
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.67
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Kudrivka - second-half results

0% W50% D50% L
3
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
3
Second-half points
-9
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.50
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+0.7

Concedes 0.7 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Veres - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.80
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match0.80.8
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-2+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Kudrivka - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.400.60
Goals scored / match0.40.2
Goals conceded / match1.01.2
Average goals in match1.41.4
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-3-5
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Veres
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
1
16-30
0
2
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
2
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Kudrivka
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
1
1
16-30
2
4
31-45
0
2
46-60
1
3
61-75
0
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.42
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
107%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-59%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
34%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
17%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Veres

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
50%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.20
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

Kudrivka

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.73
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.27
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.21
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-1.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
201%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ukrainian Premier League).

Teams vs league

VeresLigaKudrivka
Average goals in match▼ 1.502.27▲ 3.33
Both teams scored▲ 50%37%▲ 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 17%42%▲ 67%
Clean sheets▼ 33%40%▼ 33%
Goal before half-time▼ 50%62%▲ 67%
Goal after half-time▼ 67%69%▼ 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.27
Average goals per match
37%
Both teams scored
42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
40%
Clean sheets
1.33
Home goals / match
0.94
Away goals / match
+41%
Home attack advantage
+29%
Home defence advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
27%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Veres 1 - 1 - 0 Kudrivka. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FK Kudrivka
0 : 0
FC Veres Rivne
FC Veres Rivne
2 : 0
FK Kudrivka