Ukraine - Ukrainian Premier LeagueData current as of 12 September 2026

Veres vs LNZ Cherkasy: match statistics

Veres crest
Veres
0 : 3half-time 0:1
LNZ Cherkasy crest
LNZ Cherkasy
120%(4.35)
X25%(3.25)
255%(1.72)

LNZ Cherkasy presents decidedly higher form and quality, occupying 2nd place in the table with an impressive record of 12 victories this season. The visitors have won as many as 75% of away matches, keeping a clean sheet in 75% of cases, which proves their excellent defense (averaging 0.63 goals conceded per match). Veres finds itself only in 9th position, with a negative goal difference at home (-2) and poor form (only 1 victory in the last 5 matches). The xG statistics also favor LNZ (1.52 vs 1.04), and the guests have significantly higher efficiency (12% vs 9%) and more shots on target (4.38 vs 2.56). With such a large difference in class and form, LNZ Cherkasy should confidently win this encounter.

Veres vs LNZ Cherkasy: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Veres played LNZ Cherkasy in Ukrainian Premier League (Ukraine). The match was played on 9 March 2026. Final score: 0:3.

Current form

Veres: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. LNZ Cherkasy: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Veres scores 0.94 and concedes 1.18 goals per match. LNZ Cherkasy scores 1.28 and concedes 0.61. League average: 2.57 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Veres 35%, LNZ Cherkasy 17%. Over 2.5: Veres 29%, LNZ Cherkasy 22%. League level: BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 47%.

xG, shots and style

LNZ Cherkasy has higher xG: 1.63 vs 1.07. Veres: 9.3 shots per match, LNZ Cherkasy: 14.2.

Match halves

Veres: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.65. LNZ Cherkasy: half-time lead 56%, second-half goals 0.67.

Goals by minute

Veres: 46-60 (6 goals). LNZ Cherkasy: 31-45+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Ukrainian Premier League: 2.57 goals per match, BTTS 43%, Over 2.5 47%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

LNZ Cherkasy presents decidedly higher form and quality, occupying 2nd place in the table with an impressive record of 12 victories this season. The visitors have won as many as 75% of away matches, keeping a clean sheet in 75% of cases, which proves their excellent defense (averaging 0.63 goals conceded per match). Veres finds itself only in 9th position, with a negative goal difference at home (-2) and poor form (only 1 victory in the last 5 matches). The xG statistics also favor LNZ (1.52 vs 1.04), and the guests have significantly higher efficiency (12% vs 9%) and more shots on target (4.38 vs 2.56). With such a large difference in class and form, LNZ Cherkasy should confidently win this encounter.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
5Shots12
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
1Shots on target3
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
0.64xG1.29
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
6Corners7
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
34Dangerous attacks45
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
7Fouls18
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
1Cards3
VeresLNZ Cherkasy

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0.94Goals scored / match1.28
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
1.18Goals conceded / match0.61
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
40%Average possession45%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
3Shots on target / match4.61
VeresLNZ Cherkasy

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9.29Shots per match14.22
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
3Shots on target4.61
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
10.1%Shot conversion9%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
40%Possession45%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
1.07xG for1.63
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
1.61xG against1.03
VeresLNZ Cherkasy

Shooting quality

Veres: BalancedLNZ Cherkasy: Attacking
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
Accuracy (shots on target)32%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.310.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

LNZ Cherkasy is 140% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / match - Veres · 2.4 pts / match - LNZ Cherkasy

Veres
DDLWL
Season result split
29% W35% D35% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-6-6
1.24 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-3-3
Last 5 at home
2-3-0
DDWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.31Opponent xG: 2.02BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
LNZ Cherkasy
WWWWL
Season result split
67% W11% D22% L
Season (W-D-L)
12-2-4
2.11 pts / match · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-1-1
Last 5 away
5-0-0
WWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.48Opponent xG: 1.07BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

LNZ Cherkasy is 36% better for: goals scored per match.

0.94 goals / match - Veres · 1.28 goals / match - LNZ Cherkasy

LNZ Cherkasy is 93% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.18 goals / match - Veres · 0.61 goals / match - LNZ Cherkasy

Veres scoring profile: more difficult

Veres scores in 53% of matches (9 of 17 matches), while LNZ Cherkasy keeps a clean sheet in 72% (13 of 18 matches).

LNZ Cherkasy scoring profile: strong

LNZ Cherkasy scores in 78% of matches (14 of 18 matches), while Veres keeps a clean sheet in 35% (6 of 17 matches).

16Goals scored (season)23
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
20Goals conceded (season)11
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
2.12Average goals in match1.89
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
5Goals scored (last 5)9
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
8Goals conceded (last 5)3
VeresLNZ Cherkasy

How often they score at least...

53%1 goal78%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
29%2 goals33%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
12%3 goals11%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
0%4 goals6%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy

How often they concede at least...

65%1 goal28%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
35%2 goals17%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
12%3 goals11%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
6%4 goals6%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

43%
League average

Goal patterns

12%BTTS at half-time6%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
0%BTTS in both halves0%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
24%Scored in both halves33%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy

BTTS and goal count

24%Min. 3 goals and BTTS17%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
40%BTTS - last 520%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

65%Min. 1 goal before half-time78%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
29%Min. 2 goals before half-time11%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy

2nd half

65%Min. 1 goal after half-time61%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
29%Min. 2 goals after half-time22%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
6%Min. 3 goals after half-time11%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

LNZ Cherkasy is 106% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.94 pts / match - Veres · 1.94 pts / match - LNZ Cherkasy

Veres - half-time state
18% leading41% draw41% trailing
LNZ Cherkasy - half-time state
56% leading28% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.94Points per match (1st half)1.94
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
0.29Goals scored (1st half)0.61
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
0.76Goals conceded (1st half)0.28
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
1.06Average goals (1st half)0.89
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
53%Clean sheet before half-time78%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
71%No goal before half-time39%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy

After half-time (2nd half)

1.41Points per match (2nd half)1.78
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
0.65Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
0.41Goals conceded (2nd half)0.33
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
1.06Average goals (2nd half)1
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
65%Clean sheet after half-time78%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy
53%No goal after half-time50%
VeresLNZ Cherkasy

Veres - second-half results

29% W53% D18% L
16
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.94
PPG before half-time
Lead holding161%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.4

Defence stays stable across the full match.

LNZ Cherkasy - second-half results

44% W44% D11% L
35
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
+6
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.94
PPG before half-time
Lead holding120%

Leads at half-time in 56% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Veres - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.401.40
Goals scored / match0.20.8
Goals conceded / match1.20.4
Average goals in match1.41.2
1 goal60%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-5+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
LNZ Cherkasy - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.402.20
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match0.40.2
Average goals in match1.21.2
1 goal100%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+2+4
Half-time: 80% leading - 0% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Veres
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
1
2
16-30
1
6
31-45
6
0
46-60
3
3
61-75
2
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

LNZ Cherkasy
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
3
1
16-30
7
1
31-45
2
1
46-60
6
1
61-75
4
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
78%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
26%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
0%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
41%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Veres

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.54
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.43
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
73%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
92%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.24
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

LNZ Cherkasy

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.60
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.07
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.35
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.42
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
100%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
47%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ukrainian Premier League).

Teams vs league

VeresLigaLNZ Cherkasy
Average goals in match 2.122.57 1.89
Both teams scored 35%43% 17%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 29%47% 22%
Clean sheets 35%34% 72%
Goal before half-time 65%71% 78%
Goal after half-time 65%75% 61%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.57
Average goals per match
43%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
34%
Clean sheets
1.29
Home goals / match
1.28
Away goals / match
+1%
Home attack advantage
+1%
Home defence advantage
+0%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
31%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. LNZ CherkasyGoalRoman DidykAssist: Artur Ryabov
  2. LNZ CherkasyYellow cardYevhenii Pastukh
  3. LNZ CherkasyYellow cardOleg Gorin
  4. LNZ CherkasySubstitutionOn: Abdul AwuduOff: Artur Mykytyshyn
  5. LNZ CherkasySubstitutionOn: Shota NonikashviliOff: Yevhenii Pastukh
  6. LNZ CherkasyGoalAbdul AwuduAssist: Shota Nonikashvili
  7. VeresSubstitutionOn: Maksym SmiyanOff: Serhii Korniychuk
  8. LNZ CherkasyYellow cardShota Nonikashvili
  9. VeresYellow cardKonstantinos Stamoulis
  10. LNZ CherkasySubstitutionOn: Adam Yakubu HassanOff: Mark Assinor
  11. LNZ CherkasyGoalOleg GorinAssist: Shota Nonikashvili

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Oleksiy DerevinskyiMatches officiated: 12
3.5Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 242%Home wins8%Draws50%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Veres 1 - 0 - 0 LNZ Cherkasy. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

LNZ Cherkasy FC
0 : 2
FC Veres Rivne

FAQ

What was the result of Veres vs LNZ Cherkasy?

The Ukrainian Premier League match finished Veres 0:3 LNZ Cherkasy. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Veres vs LNZ Cherkasy?

Veres score 0.94 goals per game on average and LNZ Cherkasy 1.28. The Ukrainian Premier League average is 2.57 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 35% of Veres's matches and 17% of LNZ Cherkasy's.

What form are Veres and LNZ Cherkasy in?

Over the last 5 games Veres have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and LNZ Cherkasy 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Veres vs LNZ Cherkasy?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Veres vs LNZ Cherkasy: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.