Versailles vs Châteauroux: match statistics

Versailles appear to be the favourites: at home they average 1.46 goals per match with xG 1.50 versus Châteauroux’s 1.15 goals away and xG 1.16. The hosts register more shots (12.23 vs 9.08) and more shots on target (4.46 vs 3.23), translating into higher quality chances and corroborating the xG advantage. Defensively, Versailles concede 1.15 goals at home with xG against 1.22, while the visitors formally concede 1.08 goals away but have a significantly higher xG against of 1.43 and as many as 10 goals conceded in the last 5 matches, indicating greater vulnerability. In the last 5 matches the hosts scored 4 goals and averaged 1.4 points per game (record 2-1-2), whereas Châteauroux scored 7 goals but only 0.8 points per game (1-1-3); additionally the visitors fail to score in 31% of away fixtures versus just 15% for the home side. Considering Versailles’ 54% home win rate against Châteauroux’s 23% away win rate, plus the superiority in xG and shots, I estimate the probabilities as: home win 60%, draw 30%, away win 10%.

Key signals point to BTTS - Yes: Châteauroux has a seasonal BTTS rate of 62% and 60% in the last 5 matches, while the league averages 54% of games with goals on both sides. Versailles at home has a seasonal BTTS of 50% (last 5: 40%) and in the last 5 matches averaged 0.8 goals scored and 1.0 conceded, whereas Châteauroux in that period scored 1.4 and conceded 2.0. xG and shot metrics also support both teams: last 5 xG is 1.37 for Versailles vs 1.74 for Châteauroux, with xG against at 1.3 vs 1.6; shots on target are 3.21 and 3.23. Additionally, low clean sheet frequency—14% (Versailles) and 23% (Châteauroux)—and seasonal goals conceded averages of 1.71 and 1.08 reduce the likelihood of a No Goal outcome for either side, therefore I tip BTTS - Yes 62% vs No 38%.

Based on xG: Versailles has attacking xG of 1.33 while Châteauroux concedes an average xG of 1.43, yielding approximately 1.38 expected goals for the home side; Châteauroux has attacking xG of 1.16 while Versailles concedes an average xG of 1.35, yielding approximately 1.26 expected goals for the away side, totaling ≈2.64 goals. With a sum of 2.64, the probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5) is about 74%, supported by seasonal Over1.5 rates: 64% for Versailles and 77% for Châteauroux (average ≈70.5%). For the 2.5 line, a Poisson model indicates roughly a 49% chance of 3+ goals, which is close to seasonal Over2.5: 57%/46% (average ≈52%), so the signal is neutral. Over 3.5 has a low probability ≈27% (seasonal 36% and 15%, average ≈25.5%), so Under 3.5 is the safer choice. The strongest signal is Over 1.5 (side: over, line: 1.5) due to xG 1.38/1.26, total 2.64, high seasonal Over1.5 shares and a relatively high BTTS rate for both teams (50%/62%).

The strongest signal is a high frequency of half-time draws: Versailles were level at the break in 8 matches (57%), and Châteauroux in 6 matches (46%), indicating a strong chance of a draw at half-time. Full-time draws also occur frequently — Châteauroux records draws in 54% of matches this season, while Versailles win only 14% of home games, so a full-time draw appears more likely than a home win. Additionally, matches are low-scoring at half-time (home teams score an average of 0.57 goals to the break, away teams 0.54; average first-half goals are 1.29 versus 0.92), which favors 0-0/1-1 half-time scores. In the second half the visitors possess some offensive advantage — they score an average of 0.62 goals after the break, while hosts concede an average of 1.0 goal after the break, so goals may occur but not enough to produce a clear victory; in 4 of Versailles’ last 5 matches they were level at the break (80%), and Châteauroux led at half-time in 2 of 5 (40%). Therefore I select the most likely scenario as draw at half-time and draw at full-time (X/X) and assign it a 36% probability, with additional allocations to X/1 and X/2 at 12% each and smaller shares to 1/1 (8%) and 2/2 (11%).