Viborg vs AGF: match statistics
Viborg vs AGF: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Viborg play AGF in Superliga (Denmark). The match date is 6 April 2026 at 18:00. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
Viborg: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. AGF: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Viborg scores 1.53 and concedes 1.59 goals per match. AGF scores 1.94 and concedes 1.00. League average: 3.10 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Viborg 59%, AGF 72%. Over 2.5: Viborg 59%, AGF 53%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 61%.
xG, shots and style
AGF has higher xG: 1.83 vs 1.50. Viborg: 13.1 shots per match, AGF: 15.7.
Match halves
Viborg: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.72. AGF: half-time lead 63%, second-half goals 0.97.
Goals by minute
Viborg: 76-90+ (12 goals). AGF: 76-90+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Superliga: 3.10 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 61%.
Head-to-head
3 H2H matches: 0-0-3. Average goals 6.00, BTTS 100%.
Match description
The favorite is AGF — the team sits 1st in the table and has scored 47 goals this season versus Viborg’s 39, and on the road they average 2.08 goals per match. The visitors possess the stronger away defence, conceding 1.17 goals on average, while Viborg concede 1.67 at home. AGF creates more chances: on the road they average 13.5 shots and 4.83 shots on target with xG 1.54, compared to the hosts’ 11.42 shots, 4.17 on target and xG 1.30 at home. Viborg compensate with greater home efficiency (conversion rate 18% vs AGF’s 15%) and an average of 2.0 home goals per match, so the hosts have realistic scoring potential. Considering AGF’s unbeaten away record (0% losses), superior xG and higher shot volume, I tip an away win with probabilities 55% for AGF, 25% draw and 20% for Viborg.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Viborg | AGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
AGF is 175% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Viborg · 2.2 pts / match - AGF
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
AGF is 27% better for: goals scored per match.
1.53 goals / match - Viborg · 1.94 goals / match - AGF
AGF is 59% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.59 goals / match - Viborg · 1 goals / match - AGF
Viborg scores in 84% of matches (27 of 32 matches), while AGF keeps a clean sheet in 28% (9 of 32 matches).
AGF scores in 91% of matches (29 of 32 matches), while Viborg keeps a clean sheet in 28% (9 of 32 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Viborg
Over / Under — AGF
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
AGF is 73% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.25 pts / match - Viborg · 2.16 pts / match - AGF
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Viborg - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
AGF - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 63% of matches and wins 59%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +5 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Viborg
AGF
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Superliga).
Teams vs league
| Viborg | Liga | AGF | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 3.13 | 3.10 | ▼ 2.94 |
| Both teams scored | • 59% | 60% | ▲ 72% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 59% | 61% | ▼ 53% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 28% | 23% | ▲ 28% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 72% | 74% | • 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 75% | 79% | ▼ 69% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Viborg 0 - 0 - 3 AGF. Average goals 6.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Viborg vs AGF?
The Superliga match finished Viborg 1:2 AGF. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Viborg and AGF?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Viborg won 0, AGF won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 6.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Viborg vs AGF?
Viborg score 1.53 goals per game on average and AGF 1.94. The Superliga average is 3.10 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 59% of Viborg's matches and 72% of AGF's.
What form are Viborg and AGF in?
Over the last 5 games Viborg have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and AGF 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Viborg vs AGF?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.