Vihren Sandanski vs Chernomorets 1919 Burgas: match statistics
Vihren Sandanski vs Chernomorets 1919 Burgas: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Vihren Sandanski played Chernomorets 1919 Burgas in Second League (Bulgaria). The match was played on 9 August 2026. Venue: Stadion Spartak. Final score: 1:1.
Current form
Vihren Sandanski: 1-1-0, 2.00 points/match. Chernomorets 1919 Burgas: 1-1-0, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Vihren Sandanski scores 2.00 and concedes 1.50 goals per match. Chernomorets 1919 Burgas scores 1.00 and concedes 0.50. League average: 2.68 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Vihren Sandanski 100%, Chernomorets 1919 Burgas 50%. Over 2.5: Vihren Sandanski 50%, Chernomorets 1919 Burgas 0%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 53%.
xG, shots and style
Vihren Sandanski has higher xG: 1.79 vs 0.81. Vihren Sandanski: 14.5 shots per match, Chernomorets 1919 Burgas: 4.5.
Match halves
Vihren Sandanski: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 1.50. Chernomorets 1919 Burgas: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.50.
Goals by minute
Vihren Sandanski: 76-90+ (2 goals). Chernomorets 1919 Burgas: 0-15 (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Second League: 2.68 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 53%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-2. Average goals 3.50, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Vihren Sandanski are showing clearly better current form: they remain unbeaten in their last five matches, recording 3 wins and 2 draws, while Chernomorets 1919 Burgas have lost 2 of their 5 games. The hosts have scored 9 goals during this period compared with the visitors’ 5, and their average of 2.2 points per game is higher than the opponents’ 1.4. At home, Vihren create significantly more chances, averaging 17 shots and 8 on target, compared with Chernomorets’ just 5 shots and 2 on target away from home. The quality of chances also favors the hosts, whose average xG stands at 2.13, while the visitors generate only 0.69 xG. Both teams drew their only previous meeting, respectively at home and away, so a draw remains a realistic outcome; however, Vihren’s attacking intensity gives them a greater chance of securing the win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS signal is moderately positive: in their last 5 matches, Vihren recorded both teams scoring in 60% of games, while Chernomorets did so in 40%, with averages of 1.8 and 1.0 goals scored, respectively. The hosts are in good offensive form, with an average xG of 1.67 across their last five appearances, while the visitors conceded an average of 1.4 goals per match during this period. Chernomorets create fewer chances, with an average xG of 1.06, but despite conceding just 0.8 goals per game on average, Vihren have an xG against of 1.39, giving the visitors a realistic route to scoring. The main argument against the pick is the very small sample of current home data, in which Vihren kept a clean sheet in 100% of matches; however, the broader form and the visitors’ defensive profile point slightly more strongly towards goals at both ends. Therefore, BTTS - Yes is the preferred selection.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
In their last five matches, Vihren averaged 1.8 goals scored and 0.8 conceded, while Chernomorets scored 1.0 goal and conceded 1.4, indicating a home-team edge without clear potential for a very high-scoring game. Vihren's latest xG stands at 1.67, while the visitors allow 1.27 xG; meanwhile, Chernomorets' attack generates 1.06 xG against 1.39 xG allowed by the hosts. The estimated total of 2.60 goals remains well below the 3.5 line. In the current data for both teams, none of the matches exceeded 3.5 goals, and 100% of each team's games finished under 2.5 goals. Although in their five most recent outings, the percentage of matches with at least three goals was 60% for Vihren and 40% for Chernomorets, the more consistent choice is Under 3.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Vihren win at full-time, as the hosts have averaged 2.2 points per match across their last five fixtures while remaining unbeaten, whereas Chernomorets have lost 40% of their matches. The first halves are expected to be cautious: Vihren have averaged 0.4 goals before the break and the visitors 0.2, while both teams have kept a clean sheet at half-time in 80% and 60% of their respective recent appearances. After the break, the hosts’ advantage should increase, as they have averaged 1.4 goals scored and just 0.6 conceded in the second half, compared with the visitors’ averages of 0.8 scored and 0.8 conceded. Vihren also have superior current attacking output, averaging 1.8 goals scored over their last five matches compared with the opponents’ 1.0, while their xG stands at 0.93 versus 0.69 for Chernomorets. The hosts have been leading at the break in 40% of their recent matches, but the low-scoring profile of the first half provides stronger support for a balanced opening followed by a decisive second half.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Vihren Sandanski | Chernomorets 1919 Burgas | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 56% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.18 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Vihren Sandanski is 100% better for: goals scored per match.
2 goals / match - Vihren Sandanski · 1 goals / match - Chernomorets 1919 Burgas
Chernomorets 1919 Burgas is 200% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.5 goals / match - Vihren Sandanski · 0.5 goals / match - Chernomorets 1919 Burgas
Vihren Sandanski scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Chernomorets 1919 Burgas keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).
Chernomorets 1919 Burgas scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Vihren Sandanski keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Vihren Sandanski
Over / Under - Chernomorets 1919 Burgas
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Vihren Sandanski - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 1.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Chernomorets 1919 Burgas - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.5 | 1.5 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 1.5 |
| Average goals in match | 0.5 | 3.0 |
| 1 goal | 50% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 50% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 0% |
| No goal | 50% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.5 |
| Average goals in match | 0.5 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 50% | 50% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 50% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 50% |
| No goal | 50% | 50% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 76-90 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Vihren Sandanski
Chernomorets 1919 Burgas
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second League).
Teams vs league
| Vihren Sandanski | Liga | Chernomorets 1919 Burgas | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.50 | 2.68 | ▼ 1.50 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 100% | 58% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 53% | ▼ 0% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 24% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 63% | ▼ 50% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 74% | ▼ 50% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Vihren Sandanski 0 - 0 - 2 Chernomorets 1919 Burgas. Average goals 3.50, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Vihren Sandanski vs Chernomorets 1919 Burgas?
The Second League match finished Vihren Sandanski 1:1 Chernomorets 1919 Burgas. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Vihren Sandanski and Chernomorets 1919 Burgas?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Vihren Sandanski won 0, Chernomorets 1919 Burgas won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Vihren Sandanski vs Chernomorets 1919 Burgas?
Vihren Sandanski score 2.00 goals per game on average and Chernomorets 1919 Burgas 1.00. The Second League average is 2.68 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Vihren Sandanski's matches and 50% of Chernomorets 1919 Burgas's.
What form are Vihren Sandanski and Chernomorets 1919 Burgas in?
Over the last 5 games Vihren Sandanski have a 1-1-0 record (2.00 points per game) and Chernomorets 1919 Burgas 1-1-0 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Vihren Sandanski vs Chernomorets 1919 Burgas?
The statistical background for Vihren Sandanski vs Chernomorets 1919 Burgas — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


