Bulgaria - Second LeagueStadion SpartakData current as of 15 October 2026

Vihren Sandanski vs Nesebar: match statistics

Vihren Sandanski crest
Vihren Sandanski
2 : 0half-time 0:0
Nesebar crest
Nesebar

Vihren Sandanski vs Nesebar: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Vihren Sandanski played Nesebar in Second League (Bulgaria). The match was played on 27 September 2026. Venue: Stadion Spartak. Final score: 2:0.

Current form

Vihren Sandanski: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match. Nesebar: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Vihren Sandanski scores 2.30 and concedes 1.10 goals per match. Nesebar scores 2.00 and concedes 1.50. League average: 2.72 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Vihren Sandanski 70%, Nesebar 60%. Over 2.5: Vihren Sandanski 50%, Nesebar 50%. League level: BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 48%.

xG, shots and style

Vihren Sandanski has higher xG: 1.70 vs 1.66. Vihren Sandanski: 13.4 shots per match, Nesebar: 10.3.

Match halves

Vihren Sandanski: half-time lead 60%, second-half goals 1.60. Nesebar: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 1.10.

Goals by minute

Vihren Sandanski: 46-60 (6 goals). Nesebar: 0-15 (4 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second League: 2.72 goals per match, BTTS 47%, Over 2.5 48%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Vihren Sandanski lead the table and have won 6 of their 10 matches this season, while Nesebar sit fifth with a record of 5 wins, 2 draws and 3 defeats. The hosts are particularly dangerous at home: they average 2.00 goals per match with an xG of 1.89, registering 16 shots and 6.6 on target, whereas Nesebar score just 0.75 goals away from home. The difference is also evident in conversion rates, with Vihren converting 13% of their attempts compared with 7% for the visitors, who have failed to score in 25% of their away matches. The last five matches overall also favour the leaders: Vihren recorded 4 wins and scored 14 goals, while Nesebar won twice and netted 8 goals. A draw remains a realistic possibility, as the hosts have drawn 60% of their home matches, but Nesebar’s weaker attacking output and 50% away-loss rate point towards a Vihren victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Vihren average 2.83 goals at home, while Nesebar have scored 1.60 goals per game across their last five matches, creating a solid foundation for both sides to find the net. The hosts have a 67% BTTS rate this season, whereas the visitors’ figure has risen to 80% over their last five fixtures. Nesebar should create chances against a Vihren defense conceding an average of 1.67 goals, with the hosts’ opponents recording an average xG of 1.37. Vihren are clearly more dangerous in attack, averaging 8.25 shots on target compared to Nesebar’s 4.75 and posting an xG of 1.95, making their goal highly probable. The main risk to this pick is that Vihren have kept a clean sheet in 33% of their matches, but the visitors’ current attacking form points more strongly toward BTTS - Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Vihren have scored an average of 2.8 goals in their last 5 matches, while Nesebar have conceded 1.4 goals per game over the same period, clearly supporting the hosts’ scoring potential. The home side also create chances worth an average of 1.95 xG and register 8.25 shots on target per match, whereas Nesebar’s defence allows an average of 1.28 xG. Nesebar have improved offensively in their last five outings, averaging 1.6 goals per game, while both teams have exceeded 1.5 total goals in 100% and 50% of their matches so far, respectively. The projected total of 2.88 goals provides the strongest edge for Over 1.5 goals, as even with moderate finishing, two goals are a more likely scenario than a 0-1 result.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Vihren Sandanski have a clear first-half advantage: they have led at the break in 4 of their 6 home matches, while Nesebar have never been ahead at half-time in their away fixtures. The hosts average 1.33 goals before the break, compared with just 0.25 for the visitors, with Nesebar drawing at half-time in 75% of their away matches. Vihren’s advantage is also evident over the full match: they win 67% of their home games, score an average of 2.83 goals, and record 8.25 shots on target per match, compared with 4.75 for their opponents. Nesebar lose half of their away matches, score just 0.75 goals per game on the road, and have a shot conversion rate of 7%, compared with 22% for the hosts. The most likely scenario is therefore that Vihren take the lead before half-time and maintain it until the final whistle, making 1/1 the most probable HT/FT outcome.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

60Possession (%)40
Vihren SandanskiNesebar
11Shots4
Vihren SandanskiNesebar
4Shots on target1
Vihren SandanskiNesebar
1.41xG0.57
Vihren SandanskiNesebar
11Corners6
Vihren SandanskiNesebar
62Dangerous attacks35
Vihren SandanskiNesebar
10Fouls8
Vihren SandanskiNesebar
0Cards0
Vihren SandanskiNesebar

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Vihren SandanskiNesebar
2.3Goals scored / match2
Vihren SandanskiNesebar
1.1Goals conceded / match1.5
Vihren SandanskiNesebar
50%Average possession36%
Vihren SandanskiNesebar
6Shots on target / match5
Vihren SandanskiNesebar

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

13.4Shots per match10.3
Vihren SandanskiNesebar
6Shots on target5
Vihren SandanskiNesebar
17.2%Shot conversion19.4%
Vihren SandanskiNesebar
50%Possession36%
Vihren SandanskiNesebar
1.7xG for1.66
Vihren SandanskiNesebar
1.23xG against1.32
Vihren SandanskiNesebar

Shooting quality

Vihren Sandanski: Efficient finishingNesebar: Counter-attacking
Vihren SandanskiNesebar
Accuracy (shots on target)45%49%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.16
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.380.40

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Vihren Sandanski is 50% better for: last-5 form.

2.4 pts / match - Vihren Sandanski · 1.6 pts / match - Nesebar

Vihren Sandanski
WWWWL
Season result split
60% W30% D10% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-3-1
2.10 pts / match · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-3-0
Last 5 at home
2-3-0
DDDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.74Opponent xG: 1.16BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Nesebar
DLWDW
Season result split
50% W20% D30% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-2-3
1.70 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-2
Last 5 away
1-1-2
LWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 1.12BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Vihren Sandanski is 15% better for: goals scored per match.

2.3 goals / match - Vihren Sandanski · 2 goals / match - Nesebar

Vihren Sandanski is 36% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.1 goals / match - Vihren Sandanski · 1.5 goals / match - Nesebar

Vihren Sandanski scoring profile: very strong

Vihren Sandanski scores in 100% of matches (10 of 10 matches), while Nesebar keeps a clean sheet in 30% (3 of 10 matches).

Nesebar scoring profile: very strong

Nesebar scores in 90% of matches (9 of 10 matches), while Vihren Sandanski keeps a clean sheet in 30% (3 of 10 matches).

23Goals scored (season)20
Vihren SandanskiNesebar
11Goals conceded (season)15
Vihren SandanskiNesebar
3.4Average goals in match3.5
Vihren SandanskiNesebar
14Goals scored (last 5)8
Vihren SandanskiNesebar
5Goals conceded (last 5)7
Vihren SandanskiNesebar

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal90%
Vihren SandanskiNesebar
80%2 goals40%
Vihren SandanskiNesebar
30%3 goals20%
Vihren SandanskiNesebar
20%4 goals20%
Vihren SandanskiNesebar

How often they concede at least...

70%1 goal70%
Vihren SandanskiNesebar
30%2 goals30%
Vihren SandanskiNesebar
10%3 goals30%
Vihren SandanskiNesebar
0%4 goals10%
Vihren SandanskiNesebar

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

47%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time20%
Vihren SandanskiNesebar
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Vihren SandanskiNesebar
60%Scored in both halves20%
Vihren SandanskiNesebar

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS40%
Vihren SandanskiNesebar
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
Vihren SandanskiNesebar
60%BTTS - last 580%
Vihren SandanskiNesebar

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

60%Min. 1 goal before half-time80%
Vihren SandanskiNesebar
10%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Vihren SandanskiNesebar
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
Vihren SandanskiNesebar

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time80%
Vihren SandanskiNesebar
80%Min. 2 goals after half-time60%
Vihren SandanskiNesebar
50%Min. 3 goals after half-time20%
Vihren SandanskiNesebar

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Vihren Sandanski is 47% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.2 pts / match - Vihren Sandanski · 1.5 pts / match - Nesebar

Vihren Sandanski - half-time state
60% leading40% draw0% trailing
Nesebar - half-time state
40% leading30% draw30% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.2Points per match (1st half)1.5
Vihren SandanskiNesebar
0.7Goals scored (1st half)0.9
Vihren SandanskiNesebar
0Goals conceded (1st half)0.6
Vihren SandanskiNesebar
0.7Average goals (1st half)1.5
Vihren SandanskiNesebar
100%Clean sheet before half-time60%
Vihren SandanskiNesebar
40%No goal before half-time40%
Vihren SandanskiNesebar

After half-time (2nd half)

1.8Points per match (2nd half)1.2
Vihren SandanskiNesebar
1.6Goals scored (2nd half)1.1
Vihren SandanskiNesebar
1.1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.9
Vihren SandanskiNesebar
2.7Average goals (2nd half)2
Vihren SandanskiNesebar
30%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Vihren SandanskiNesebar
0%No goal after half-time50%
Vihren SandanskiNesebar

Vihren Sandanski - second-half results

50% W30% D20% L
22
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
18
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 60% of matches and wins 60%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+1.1

Concedes 1.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Nesebar - second-half results

30% W30% D40% L
15
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
12
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding125%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 50%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Vihren Sandanski - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.202.40
Goals scored / match0.82.0
Goals conceded / match0.01.0
Average goals in match0.83.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal40%0%
Goal difference+4+5
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4
Nesebar - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.41.0
Average goals in match1.02.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Vihren Sandanski
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
3
0
16-30
3
0
31-45
6
5
46-60
4
4
61-75
6
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

Nesebar
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
4
0
16-30
1
4
31-45
4
3
46-60
3
3
61-75
4
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.45
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.9 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
127%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
65%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
90%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Vihren Sandanski

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.47
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.73
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.60
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
146%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
96%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.30
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.9
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 4% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Nesebar

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.34
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
175%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second League).

Teams vs league

Vihren SandanskiLigaNesebar
Average goals in match▲ 3.402.72▲ 3.50
Both teams scored▲ 70%47%▲ 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 50%48%▲ 50%
Clean sheets• 30%30%• 30%
Goal before half-time▼ 60%64%▲ 80%
Goal after half-time▲ 100%76%▲ 80%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.72
Average goals per match
47%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.58
Home goals / match
1.14
Away goals / match
+39%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defence advantage
+26%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
64%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

—Aykut Ramadan⚽ 1
—Kaloyan KrastevA 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Vihren SandanskiGoalAykut Ramadan
  2. Vihren SandanskiAssistKaloyan Krastev

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Vihren Sandanski vs Nesebar?

The Second League match finished Vihren Sandanski 2:0 Nesebar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Vihren Sandanski vs Nesebar?

Vihren Sandanski score 2.30 goals per game on average and Nesebar 2.00. The Second League average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 70% of Vihren Sandanski's matches and 60% of Nesebar's.

What form are Vihren Sandanski and Nesebar in?

Over the last 5 games Vihren Sandanski have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Nesebar 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Vihren Sandanski vs Nesebar?

The statistical background for Vihren Sandanski vs Nesebar — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.