Viitorul Şelimbăr vs FC Bacău: match statistics
Viitorul Şelimbăr vs FC Bacău: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Viitorul Şelimbăr played FC Bacău in Liga II (Romania). The match was played on 9 May 2026. Final score: 4:1.
Current form
Viitorul Şelimbăr: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. FC Bacău: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Viitorul Şelimbăr scores 1.15 and concedes 1.48 goals per match. FC Bacău scores 1.26 and concedes 1.22. League average: 2.69 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Viitorul Şelimbăr 52%, FC Bacău 48%. Over 2.5: Viitorul Şelimbăr 44%, FC Bacău 41%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 49%.
xG, shots and style
FC Bacău has higher xG: 1.47 vs 1.42. Viitorul Şelimbăr: 11.0 shots per match, FC Bacău: 9.4.
Match halves
Viitorul Şelimbăr: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.48. FC Bacău: half-time lead 37%, second-half goals 0.52.
Goals by minute
Viitorul Şelimbăr: 31-45+ (9 goals). FC Bacău: 31-45+ (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Liga II: 2.69 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 49%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win. Viitorul Şelimbăr has a clear offensive edge at home: 1.58 goals per home game with xG 1.53, 4.67 shots on target per match and a shot conversion rate of 13%. FC Bacău, despite sitting 3rd with 12 wins this season, posts weaker away metrics — only 1.08 goals per away match with xG 1.36 and as many as 46% of away games without scoring. Defensively the sides are comparable in volume: hosts concede 1.33 goals per home game, visitors concede 1.38 on the road; in the last 5 matches Viitorul scored 3 and conceded 8, while Bacău scored 5 and conceded 7. Additionally, the hosts create more chances (12.42 average shots at home vs 9.54 away for the visitors) and have a low share of goalless home matches (17% vs 46%), which gives them a practical advantage. Considering recent form over the last 5 matches (0.8 points on average for the hosts vs 1.2 for the visitors), I estimate probabilities: home 45%, draw 30%, away 25%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
In my assessment the 'No' (No BTTS) scenario is more likely and I assign it a 65% probability. In the last 5 matches the home side have BTTS in only 20% of games, scoring on average 0.6 goals and conceding 1.6, while the visitors have BTTS in 40% of their last 5 and score 1.0 on average. Seasonal stats are mixed: Viitorul Şelimbăr have a season BTTS rate of 57% versus FC Bacău's 38%, average goals 1.43 for the hosts and 1.08 for the guests, and average goals conceded 1.07 and 1.38 respectively. Additionally the league records 57% clean sheets, and xG shows 1.63 xG generated by the hosts versus 1.79 xG allowed by the visitors; hosts average 12.18 shots and 4.91 shots on target vs 9.54 and 3.92 for the guests, however the last 5 matches show poor conversion (only 3 goals by the hosts in total). Considering the low home BTTS rate in the last 5 (20%), moderate seasonal values for the visitors and the high share of clean sheets in the league (57%), I rate No BTTS as the stronger signal (65% No vs 35% Yes).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG-based model and supporting stats point to more goals: hosts have an xG of 1.63 while opponents concede 1.79 xG, yielding a projected 1.71 xG for Viitorul Şelimbăr; visitors generate 1.36 xG versus hosts who concede 1.34 xG, yielding 1.35 xG for FC Bacău. The total projected goals are 3.06, which the model translates into roughly an 81% probability of Over 1.5 goals and about a 59% probability of Over 2.5 goals. Additionally, the hosts average 4.91 shots on target versus 3.92 for their opponents, and season Over 1.5 rates are 71% (hosts) and 69% (guests), reinforcing the over signal. Season Over 2.5 rates are 43% and 38%, so the 2.5 line is inherently riskier than 1.5. I select Over 1.5 as the best option because the projected 3.06 goals and the high share of matches above 1.5 provide the strongest, most reliable signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I back 1/1 (home leading at Half-Time and winning Full-Time) because first-half metrics favor Viitorul Şelimbăr: the hosts average 0.93 goals by the break and concede 0.36, while FC Bacău average 0.54 scored and 0.85 conceded. The hosts led at the break in 43% of matches, whereas the visitors were leading only in 31% and as away team were trailing at half-time in 46% of matches, indicating a Viitorul advantage in the first half. Over the full match Viitorul win 50% of games, have a higher xG (1.63 vs 1.36) and generate more shots (12.18 vs 9.54) and shots on target (4.91 vs 3.92), which increases the likelihood of maintaining the lead. It should be noted, however, that the hosts have weaker recent form in the last 5 matches (20% wins and 0.6 goals on average) compared to the visitors’ better recent form (40% wins and 1.0 goal), so scenarios with a draw at Half-Time are also realistic, hence meaningful probabilities for X/1 (18%) and X/X (16%).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Viitorul Şelimbăr | FC Bacău | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.16 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
FC Bacău is 50% better for: last-5 form.
0.8 pts / match - Viitorul Şelimbăr · 1.2 pts / match - FC Bacău
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
FC Bacău is 10% better for: goals scored per match.
1.15 goals / match - Viitorul Şelimbăr · 1.26 goals / match - FC Bacău
FC Bacău is 21% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.48 goals / match - Viitorul Şelimbăr · 1.22 goals / match - FC Bacău
Viitorul Şelimbăr scores in 67% of matches (18 of 27 matches), while FC Bacău keeps a clean sheet in 30% (8 of 27 matches).
FC Bacău scores in 70% of matches (19 of 27 matches), while Viitorul Şelimbăr keeps a clean sheet in 22% (6 of 27 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Viitorul Şelimbăr
Over / Under - FC Bacău
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
FC Bacău is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.41 pts / match - Viitorul Şelimbăr · 1.48 pts / match - FC Bacău
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Viitorul Şelimbăr - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 26%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
FC Bacău - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 37% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.4 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (10 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Viitorul Şelimbăr
FC Bacău
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga II).
Teams vs league
| Viitorul Şelimbăr | Liga | FC Bacău | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.63 | 2.69 | ▼ 2.48 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 52% | 49% | • 48% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 44% | 49% | ▼ 41% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 22% | 29% | • 30% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 72% | ▲ 85% |
| Goal after half-time | • 81% | 82% | ▼ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Viitorul ŞelimbărGoalTudor Marius Telcean
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Viitorul Şelimbăr 0 - 1 - 0 FC Bacău. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Viitorul Şelimbăr vs FC Bacău?
The Liga II match finished Viitorul Şelimbăr 4:1 FC Bacău. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Viitorul Şelimbăr vs FC Bacău?
Viitorul Şelimbăr score 1.15 goals per game on average and FC Bacău 1.26. The Liga II average is 2.69 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 52% of Viitorul Şelimbăr's matches and 48% of FC Bacău's.
What form are Viitorul Şelimbăr and FC Bacău in?
Over the last 5 games Viitorul Şelimbăr have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and FC Bacău 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Viitorul Şelimbăr vs FC Bacău?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Viitorul Şelimbăr vs FC Bacău: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.