Norway - EliteserienData current as of 07 September 2026

Viking vs Start: match statistics

Viking crest
Viking
6 : 3half-time 1:3
Start crest
Start

Viking vs Start: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Viking played Start in Eliteserien (Norway). The match was played on 16 May 2026. Final score: 6:3.

Current form

Viking: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match. Start: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Viking scores 2.63 and concedes 0.75 goals per match. Start scores 0.75 and concedes 2.00. League average: 2.78 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Viking 50%, Start 75%. Over 2.5: Viking 75%, Start 38%. League level: BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 48%.

xG, shots and style

Viking has higher xG: 1.81 vs 1.31. Viking: 16.0 shots per match, Start: 11.0.

Match halves

Viking: half-time lead 88%, second-half goals 0.88. Start: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.50.

Goals by minute

Viking: 0-15 (7 goals). Start: 46-60 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Eliteserien: 2.78 goals per match, BTTS 48%, Over 2.5 48%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Viking holds a clear home advantage: in the last 5 matches they have won all 5 and scored 15 goals; at home they record 100% wins and average 3.75 goals per game. Start away has no wins (0% wins), scores 0.6 goals on average and concedes 2.6 goals away, with an 80% away defeat rate. Hosts create more chances: 16 shots and 7 shots on target on average at home with a 23% conversion, while Start averages 9.6 shots and 3.4 on target with a 6% conversion on the road, which strongly favors Viking in terms of chance conversion. The xG and defensive differentials are significant as well — Viking at home has xG 1.84 and xG conceded 1.13, whereas Start generates xG 1.13 away and allows opponents 2.01 xG, indicating superior quality of the hosts' chances. Considering these figures and the fact Viking have scored 21 and conceded 6 this season while Start have 6 scored and 16 conceded, I predict a home victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I back BTTS - Yes. Viking has 100% of matches this season with Goal/Goal, Start 60%, while the league average is 48% BTTS. Home xG is 1.6 with 13.33 shots (4.33 on target) per match and an 8% conversion rate, favoring the hosts’ scoring. Start’s defense concedes xG 2.01 on the road and they concede 2.6 goals per match season-to-date. Despite a low away scoring average of 0.6, Start has 80% BTTS in the last 5 matches with an away xG of 1.43 in that period, actually scoring 4 times (0.8 per match). Both teams have 0% clean sheets this season versus a league average of 56% clean sheets, indicating clean sheets are rare for them. Considering Viking’s 100% BTTS, Start’s 60%, the hosts’ superiority in shots and xG, and Start’s defensive vulnerability, I assess BTTS probability at 80% vs 20% and pick ‘yes’.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Viking averages 1.0 goals scored at home this season, but has been scoring 3.0 goals on average over the last 5 matches; Start averages 0.6 goals this season and 0.8 over the last 5. xG assigns the home side 1.81 expected goals (1.6 attacking xG and 2.01 xG against Start -> 1.81), and Start 1.09 (1.13 attacking xG and 1.06 xG against Viking -> 1.09), a combined 2.90 expected goals, above the league average of 2.78. Viking averages 13.33 shots and 4.33 on target per match versus Start’s 9.6 and 3.4, and season data shows both teams have 100% of matches over 1.5 goals, strongly favoring the over 1.5. Start has conceded 16 goals this season and 12 in the last 5 matches, while Viking scored 15 goals in those 5 matches (3.0 per game), so a minimum-2-goal scenario is highly likely. On this basis I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest signal (≈95%); Over 2.5 looks promising (≈70%), and Over 3.5 is less certain (≈35%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Viking is the clear favorite: in the last 5 matches they have won all 5 (100%) and average 3.0 goals scored and 0.6 conceded, while Start has 0 wins in that period, averaging 0.8 goals scored and 2.4 conceded. At half-time Viking led in 5 of the last 5 matches (100%) and in those games averaged 1.8 goals by the break, whereas Start led only 20% of the time and averages 0.2 goals by half-time. xG and shot statistics confirm the home side’s superiority: Viking xG is 1.6 versus 1.13 for Start, opponents’ xG against Start is 2.01; the home team averages 13.33 shots and 4.33 on target compared to the visitors’ 9.6 and 3.4, with conversion rates of 8% versus 6%. On this basis the most likely scenario is Viking leading at the break and winning after 90 minutes (HT/FT 1/1) — I assign it a 56% probability, while the option of the home team leading at the break and a draw at full-time receives 10%. I leave small chances for a draw at half-time (HT/FT X/X 10%) and for a later Start turnaround, since Start concedes an average of 2.4 goals in the last 5 matches and rarely leads at the break (20%), which limits the likelihood of guest-leading scenarios.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 3
1st half
5 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

61Possession (%)39
VikingStart
16Shots9
VikingStart
8Shots on target5
VikingStart
2.06xG1.17
VikingStart
12Corners2
VikingStart
67Dangerous attacks34
VikingStart
12Fouls13
VikingStart
2Cards3
VikingStart

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

2.63Goals scored / match0.75
VikingStart
0.75Goals conceded / match2
VikingStart
50%Average possession44%
VikingStart
5.88Shots on target / match3.75
VikingStart

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

16Shots per match11
VikingStart
5.88Shots on target3.75
VikingStart
16.4%Shot conversion6.8%
VikingStart
50%Possession44%
VikingStart
1.81xG for1.31
VikingStart
1.09xG against1.65
VikingStart

Shooting quality

Viking: AttackingStart: Balanced
VikingStart
Accuracy (shots on target)37%34%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.450.20

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Viking is 650% better for: last-5 form.

3 pts / match - Viking · 0.4 pts / match - Start

Viking
WWWWW
5 wins in a row
Season result split
88% W0% R13% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-0-1
2.63 pts / match · goal difference +15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
5-0-0
3.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-0-0
Last 5 at home
4-0-0
WWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 3.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.85Opponent xG: 0.92BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 80%
Start
LDLLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W50% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
0-4-4
0.50 pts / match · goal difference -10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-4
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LDLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.42Opponent xG: 1.71BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Viking is 251% better for: goals scored per match.

2.63 goals / match - Viking · 0.75 goals / match - Start

Viking is 167% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.75 goals / match - Viking · 2 goals / match - Start

Viking scoring profile: very strong

Viking scores in 100% of matches (8 of 8 matches), while Start keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 8 matches).

Start scoring profile: strong

Start scores in 75% of matches (6 of 8 matches), while Viking keeps a clean sheet in 50% (4 of 8 matches).

21Goals scored (season)6
VikingStart
6Goals conceded (season)16
VikingStart
3.38Average goals in match2.75
VikingStart
15Goals scored (last 5)4
VikingStart
3Goals conceded (last 5)12
VikingStart

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal75%
VikingStart
75%2 goals0%
VikingStart
50%3 goals0%
VikingStart
25%4 goals0%
VikingStart

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal100%
VikingStart
25%2 goals50%
VikingStart
0%3 goals25%
VikingStart
0%4 goals13%
VikingStart

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

38%BTTS at half-time13%
VikingStart
13%BTTS in both halves0%
VikingStart
75%Scored in both halves0%
VikingStart

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
VikingStart
25%Min. 3 goals without BTTS13%
VikingStart
40%BTTS - last 580%
VikingStart

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
VikingStart
63%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
VikingStart
50%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
VikingStart

2nd half

75%Min. 1 goal after half-time88%
VikingStart
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
VikingStart
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time25%
VikingStart

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Viking is 251% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

2.63 pts / match - Viking · 0.75 pts / match - Start

Viking - half-time state
88% leading0% draw13% trailing
Start - half-time state
13% leading38% draw50% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

2.63Points per match (1st half)0.75
VikingStart
1.75Goals scored (1st half)0.25
VikingStart
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.88
VikingStart
2.25Average goals (1st half)1.13
VikingStart
63%Clean sheet before half-time38%
VikingStart
0%No goal before half-time75%
VikingStart

After half-time (2nd half)

2Points per match (2nd half)1
VikingStart
0.88Goals scored (2nd half)0.5
VikingStart
0.25Goals conceded (2nd half)1.13
VikingStart
1.13Average goals (2nd half)1.63
VikingStart
75%Clean sheet after half-time38%
VikingStart
25%No goal after half-time50%
VikingStart

Viking - second-half results

50% W50% R0% P
21
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+10
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.63
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 88% of matches and wins 88%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Start - second-half results

25% W25% R50% P
6
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
8
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.75
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Viking - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match3.002.20
Goals scored / match1.81.2
Goals conceded / match0.20.4
Average goals in match2.01.6
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal0%0%
Goal difference+8+4
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 9
Start - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.80
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match1.01.4
Average goals in match1.22.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-4-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Viking
ScoredConceded
7
1
0-15
2
0
16-30
5
3
31-45
1
1
46-60
3
1
61-75
3
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Start
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
1
3
16-30
1
3
31-45
2
1
46-60
1
4
61-75
1
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.06
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
2.3 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
110%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
63%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
75%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Viking

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.72
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.82
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.34
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
155%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
69%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.37
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.9
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 33% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Start

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.91
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.56
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
69%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
118%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eliteserien).

Teams vs league

VikingLigaStart
Average goals in match 3.382.78 2.75
Both teams scored 50%48% 75%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 75%48% 38%
Clean sheets 50%27% 0%
Goal before half-time 100%78% 75%
Goal after half-time 75%77% 88%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.78
Average goals per match
48%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.70
Home goals / match
1.08
Away goals / match
+57%
Home attack advantage
+36%
Home defence advantage
+24%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. StartYellow cardErlend Dahl Reitan
  2. StartYellow cardJacob Pryts Larsen
  3. VikingYellow cardGianni Stensness
  4. StartSubstitutionOn: Markus SoometsOff: Erlend Segberg
  5. VikingSubstitutionOn: Niklas Kemp FuglestadOff: Edvin Austbö
  6. VikingYellow cardKristoffer Askildsen
  7. StartYellow cardAlexander Gurendal
  8. VikingSubstitutionOn: Vetle AuklendOff: Zlatko Tripić

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Viking vs Start?

The Eliteserien match finished Viking 6:3 Start. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Viking vs Start?

Viking score 2.63 goals per game on average and Start 0.75. The Eliteserien average is 2.78 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Viking's matches and 75% of Start's.

What form are Viking and Start in?

Over the last 5 games Viking have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Start 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Viking vs Start?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.