Uganda - Uganda Premier LeagueSt. Mary's StadiumData current as of 14 November 2026

Vipers vs Ntugasaze: match statistics

Vipers crest
Vipers
3 : 0half-time 1:0
Ntugasaze crest
Ntugasaze

Vipers vs Ntugasaze: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Vipers played Ntugasaze in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The match was played on 19 September 2026. Venue: St. Mary's Stadium. Final score: 3:0.

Current form

Vipers: 0-0-1, 0.00 points/match. Ntugasaze: 0-0-3, 0.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Vipers scores 0.00 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Ntugasaze scores 0.67 and concedes 2.67. League average: 2.00 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Vipers 0%, Ntugasaze 67%. Over 2.5: Vipers 0%, Ntugasaze 67%. League level: BTTS 39%, Over 2.5 35%.

xG, shots and style

Ntugasaze has higher xG: 1.69 vs 1.30. Vipers: 9.0 shots per match, Ntugasaze: 13.3.

Match halves

Vipers: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.00. Ntugasaze: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.33.

Goals by minute

Vipers: 0-15 (0 goals). Ntugasaze: 31-45+ (1 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uganda Premier League: 2.00 goals per match, BTTS 39%, Over 2.5 35%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Vipers hold a slight edge, primarily due to their superior recent form: they have picked up 5 points in their last five matches, while Ntugasaze have lost all 3 of their games so far. Although the hosts are yet to score at home, they create chances worth an average of 1.30 xG and dominate possession at 66%, compared with the visitors’ 46% away from home. Ntugasaze concede as many as 2.5 goals per away match, have failed to keep a clean sheet, and allow opponents 1.79 xG. The visitors register more shots on target away from home—3.5 compared with the hosts’ 1—but this translates to just 0.5 goals per match and a 5% conversion rate. Given Vipers’ poor finishing and the fact that neither team has recorded a league win, a draw remains a realistic outcome; however, Ntugasaze’s significantly more vulnerable defence points towards a narrow home victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest argument for BTTS - No is the limited current scoring output of both teams: Vipers are averaging 0.6 goals over their last five matches, while Ntugasaze are averaging 0.67. Vipers have also improved defensively, conceding just 0.8 goals per game during this period, with an average xG against them of 1.05, which reduces the visitors’ chances of scoring. Ntugasaze are admittedly very weak defensively, averaging 2.67 goals conceded in their recent matches, so the hosts have solid grounds to score. However, the league has a low rate of matches in which both teams score, at 39%, while the visitors have lost their last three matches and their poor attacking output supports a scenario in which at least one team fails to score. The lack of clean sheets for both sides this season increases the BTTS risk, but the low scoring form and Vipers’ current defensive performance give the BTTS - No pick the edge.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

In their last five matches, Vipers have averaged just 0.6 goals scored and 0.8 conceded, clearly tempering the very high figures from the small-season sample. Ntugasaze average 0.67 goals scored, but their defense allows 2.67 goals per match, so the hosts should have the clearest path to a scoreline in the range of 1–2 goals. Recent-match expected goals stand at 1.35 for Vipers and 1.69 for Ntugasaze; however, this is clearly a low-scoring league, with the overall competition average at 1.96 goals and only 35% of matches going Over 2.5 goals. Moreover, Vipers have gone Over 2.5 goals in just 20% of their last five appearances, while their shot conversion rate is only 5%. The Under 3.5 goals pick holds value, as even exploiting the visitors’ weak defense, a scenario involving four or more goals would require a clear break from the hosts’ low current attacking output.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Vipers victory at full-time, as the hosts were level after 45 minutes in 80% of their last five matches, while Ntugasaze were trailing at the break in each of their last three games. Vipers create significantly more chances, with average xG of 2.33 compared with the visitors’ 1.37, while the hosts average 20 shots to Ntugasaze’s 10. The visitors’ defence is particularly vulnerable to conceding, as Ntugasaze allowed an average of 2.67 goals in their last five matches, compared with just 0.80 for Vipers. After the break, the hosts score an average of 1.0 goal, while the visitors concede 2.0, strengthening Vipers’ chances of turning an evenly balanced start to the match in their favour. In their last five appearances, Vipers averaged 1.0 point per match, whereas Ntugasaze failed to earn any points and lost all three available fixtures.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

65Possession (%)35
VipersNtugasaze
14Shots10
VipersNtugasaze
4Shots on target2
VipersNtugasaze
1.9xG1.23
VipersNtugasaze
10Corners0
VipersNtugasaze
102Dangerous attacks62
VipersNtugasaze
18Fouls5
VipersNtugasaze
0Cards0
VipersNtugasaze

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0Goals scored / match0.67
VipersNtugasaze
1Goals conceded / match2.67
VipersNtugasaze
66%Average possession50%
VipersNtugasaze
1Shots on target / match4
VipersNtugasaze

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

9Shots per match13.33
VipersNtugasaze
1Shots on target4
VipersNtugasaze
0%Shot conversion5%
VipersNtugasaze
66%Possession50%
VipersNtugasaze
1.3xG for1.69
VipersNtugasaze
1.17xG against1.78
VipersNtugasaze

Shooting quality

Vipers: BalancedNtugasaze: Balanced
VipersNtugasaze
Accuracy (shots on target)11%30%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.000.17

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Vipers
L
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W0% D100% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-0-1
0.00 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-1
0.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-0-1
Last 5 at home
0-0-1
L
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.30Opponent xG: 1.17BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
Ntugasaze
LLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W0% D100% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-0-3
0.00 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-3
0.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-0-2
Last 5 away
0-0-2
LL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.7Goals conceded: 2.7xG: 1.69Opponent xG: 1.78BTTS: 67%Over 2.5: 67%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Vipers is 167% better for: goals conceded per match.

1 goals / match - Vipers · 2.67 goals / match - Ntugasaze

Vipers scoring profile: mixed

Vipers scores in 0% of matches (0 of 1 matches), while Ntugasaze keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 matches).

Ntugasaze scoring profile: very strong

Ntugasaze scores in 67% of matches (2 of 3 matches), while Vipers keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 matches).

0Goals scored (season)2
VipersNtugasaze
1Goals conceded (season)8
VipersNtugasaze
1Average goals in match3.33
VipersNtugasaze
0Goals scored (last 5)2
VipersNtugasaze
1Goals conceded (last 5)8
VipersNtugasaze

How often they score at least...

0%1 goal67%
VipersNtugasaze
0%2 goals0%
VipersNtugasaze
0%3 goals0%
VipersNtugasaze
0%4 goals0%
VipersNtugasaze

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal100%
VipersNtugasaze
0%2 goals67%
VipersNtugasaze
0%3 goals67%
VipersNtugasaze
0%4 goals33%
VipersNtugasaze

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time33%
VipersNtugasaze
0%BTTS in both halves0%
VipersNtugasaze
0%Scored in both halves0%
VipersNtugasaze

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS67%
VipersNtugasaze
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
VipersNtugasaze
0%BTTS - last 567%
VipersNtugasaze

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time67%
VipersNtugasaze
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time67%
VipersNtugasaze
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time33%
VipersNtugasaze

2nd half

0%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
VipersNtugasaze
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
VipersNtugasaze
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
VipersNtugasaze

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Vipers - half-time state
0% leading0% draw100% trailing
Ntugasaze - half-time state
0% leading33% draw67% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0Points per match (1st half)0.33
VipersNtugasaze
0Goals scored (1st half)0.33
VipersNtugasaze
1Goals conceded (1st half)1.33
VipersNtugasaze
1Average goals (1st half)1.67
VipersNtugasaze
0%Clean sheet before half-time33%
VipersNtugasaze
100%No goal before half-time67%
VipersNtugasaze

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per match (2nd half)0.67
VipersNtugasaze
0Goals scored (2nd half)0.33
VipersNtugasaze
0Goals conceded (2nd half)1
VipersNtugasaze
0Average goals (2nd half)1.33
VipersNtugasaze
100%Clean sheet after half-time33%
VipersNtugasaze
100%No goal after half-time67%
VipersNtugasaze

Vipers - second-half results

0% W100% D0% L
0
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-1.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ntugasaze - second-half results

0% W67% D33% L
1
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
2
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.33
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time-0.3

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Vipers - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.001.00
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match1.00.0
Average goals in match1.00.0
1 goal100%0%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet0%100%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 0% leading - 0% draw - 100% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Ntugasaze - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.330.67
Goals scored / match0.30.3
Goals conceded / match1.31.0
Average goals in match1.71.3
1 goal67%67%
2 goals67%67%
3 goals33%0%
Clean sheet33%33%
No goal67%67%
Goal difference-3-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 33% draw - 67% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 67% draw - 33% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 33% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Vipers
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
0
76-90

Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Ntugasaze
ScoredConceded
0
2
0-15
0
1
16-30
1
2
31-45
1
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (1 goal). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.17
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
109%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
34%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
0%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
33%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 3 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Vipers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.13
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
0.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-1.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
0%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
119%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Ntugasaze

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.91
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-1.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.89
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
80%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
230%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).

Teams vs league

VipersLigaNtugasaze
Average goals in match▼ 1.002.00▲ 3.33
Both teams scored▼ 0%39%▲ 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 0%35%▲ 67%
Clean sheets▼ 0%39%▼ 0%
Goal before half-time▲ 100%55%▲ 67%
Goal after half-time▼ 0%65%▲ 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.00
Average goals per match
39%
Both teams scored
35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.16
Home goals / match
0.84
Away goals / match
+38%
Home attack advantage
+28%
Home defence advantage
+19%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
55%
1 goal
26%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

—Abdul Karim WatambalaA 1

Away team

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. VipersAssistAbdul Karim Watambala

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Vipers vs Ntugasaze?

The Uganda Premier League match finished Vipers 3:0 Ntugasaze. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Vipers vs Ntugasaze?

Vipers score 0.00 goals per game on average and Ntugasaze 0.67. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.00 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Vipers's matches and 67% of Ntugasaze's.

What form are Vipers and Ntugasaze in?

Over the last 5 games Vipers have a 0-0-1 record (0.00 points per game) and Ntugasaze 0-0-3 (0.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Vipers vs Ntugasaze?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Vipers vs Ntugasaze: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.