Vipers vs UPDF: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Vipers play UPDF in Uganda Premier League (Uganda). The match date is 2 December 2025 at 17:00. Final score: 5:1.

Current form

Vipers: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. UPDF: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Vipers scores 1.90 and concedes 0.48 goals per match. UPDF scores 0.80 and concedes 1.37. League average: 2.09 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Vipers 48%, UPDF 40%. Over 2.5: Vipers 41%, UPDF 40%. League level: BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 35%.

xG, shots and style

Vipers has higher xG: 1.62 vs 1.53. Vipers: 10.8 shots per match, UPDF: 10.8.

Match halves

Vipers: half-time lead 52%, second-half goals 1.00. UPDF: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 0.43.

Goals by minute

Vipers: 31-45+ (13 goals). UPDF: 31-45+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uganda Premier League: 2.09 goals per match, BTTS 38%, Over 2.5 35%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Half-by-half

3 : 1
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

48Possession (%)52
VipersUPDF
18Shots18
VipersUPDF
9Shots on target5
VipersUPDF
2.28xG2.06
VipersUPDF
6Corners11
VipersUPDF
71Dangerous attacks78
VipersUPDF
12Fouls8
VipersUPDF
0Cards0
VipersUPDF

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.9Goals scored / match0.8
VipersUPDF
0.48Goals conceded / match1.37
VipersUPDF
52%Average possession50%
VipersUPDF
4.34Shots on target / match3.1
VipersUPDF

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.83Shots per match10.77
VipersUPDF
4.34Shots on target3.1
VipersUPDF
17.5%Shot conversion7.4%
VipersUPDF
52%Possession50%
VipersUPDF
1.62xG for1.53
VipersUPDF
1.09xG against1.32
VipersUPDF

Shooting quality

Vipers: Efficient finishingUPDF: Balanced
VipersUPDF
Accuracy (shots on target)40%29%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.440.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Vipers is 1000% better for: last-5 form.

2.2 pts / match - Vipers · 0.2 pts / match - UPDF

Vipers
DDWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
69% W31% R0% P
Season (W-D-L)
20-9-0
2.38 pts / match · goal difference +41
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
11-4-0
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
WDWDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.43Opponent xG: 0.99BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
UPDF
LLLDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
17% W23% R60% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-7-18
0.73 pts / match · goal difference -17
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
3-2-10
Last 5 away
1-1-3
DWLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.18Opponent xG: 1.42BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Vipers is 137% better for: goals scored per match.

1.9 goals / match - Vipers · 0.8 goals / match - UPDF

Vipers is 185% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.48 goals / match - Vipers · 1.37 goals / match - UPDF

Vipers scoring profile: very strong

Vipers scores in 93% of matches (27 of 29 matches), while UPDF keeps a clean sheet in 27% (8 of 30 matches).

UPDF scoring profile: more difficult

UPDF scores in 50% of matches (15 of 30 matches), while Vipers keeps a clean sheet in 52% (15 of 29 matches).

55Goals scored (season)24
VipersUPDF
14Goals conceded (season)41
VipersUPDF
2.38Average goals in match2.17
VipersUPDF
8Goals scored (last 5)2
VipersUPDF
2Goals conceded (last 5)8
VipersUPDF

How often they score at least...

93%1 goal50%
VipersUPDF
55%2 goals17%
VipersUPDF
28%3 goals7%
VipersUPDF
10%4 goals3%
VipersUPDF

How often they concede at least...

48%1 goal73%
VipersUPDF
0%2 goals43%
VipersUPDF
0%3 goals10%
VipersUPDF
0%4 goals7%
VipersUPDF

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

3%BTTS at half-time17%
VipersUPDF
0%BTTS in both halves10%
VipersUPDF
34%Scored in both halves17%
VipersUPDF

BTTS and goal count

24%Min. 3 goals and BTTS37%
VipersUPDF
17%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
VipersUPDF
40%BTTS - last 540%
VipersUPDF

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

62%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
VipersUPDF
21%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
VipersUPDF
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time10%
VipersUPDF

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
VipersUPDF
38%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
VipersUPDF
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time7%
VipersUPDF

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Vipers is 122% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.93 pts / match - Vipers · 0.87 pts / match - UPDF

Vipers - half-time state
52% leading38% draw10% trailing
UPDF - half-time state
13% leading47% draw40% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.93Points per match (1st half)0.87
VipersUPDF
0.86Goals scored (1st half)0.37
VipersUPDF
0.14Goals conceded (1st half)0.73
VipersUPDF
1Average goals (1st half)1.1
VipersUPDF
86%Clean sheet before half-time50%
VipersUPDF
48%No goal before half-time73%
VipersUPDF

After half-time (2nd half)

2Points per match (2nd half)1.07
VipersUPDF
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.43
VipersUPDF
0.34Goals conceded (2nd half)0.63
VipersUPDF
1.34Average goals (2nd half)1.07
VipersUPDF
66%Clean sheet after half-time53%
VipersUPDF
28%No goal after half-time60%
VipersUPDF

Vipers - second-half results

55% W34% R10% P
56
Half-time points
25
Half-time goals
+21
Goal difference (1st half)
58
Second-half points
+19
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.93
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 52% of matches and wins 69%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

UPDF - second-half results

20% W47% R33% P
26
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-11
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.87
PPG before half-time
Lead holding131%

Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 17%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Vipers - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.003.00
Goals scored / match0.41.2
Goals conceded / match0.40.0
Average goals in match0.81.2
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%100%
No goal80%0%
Goal difference0+6
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 100% won - 0% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
UPDF - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.80
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference-3-3
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Vipers
ScoredConceded
9
0
0-15
4
1
16-30
13
3
31-45
11
4
46-60
11
3
61-75
7
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

UPDF
ScoredConceded
3
6
0-15
2
4
16-30
6
12
31-45
5
4
46-60
4
4
61-75
4
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -7 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.27
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 0.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
109%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
44%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+32%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
47%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
4%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 25 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Vipers

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.53
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.89
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-12.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.28
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.61
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
151%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
58%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.18
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

UPDF

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.78
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.73
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
96%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.53
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uganda Premier League).

Teams vs league

VipersLigaUPDF
Average goals in match 2.382.09 2.17
Both teams scored 48%38% 40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 41%35% 40%
Clean sheets 52%39% 27%
Goal before half-time 62%59% 60%
Goal after half-time 83%62% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.09
Average goals per match
38%
Both teams scored
35%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
39%
Clean sheets
1.26
Home goals / match
0.83
Away goals / match
+52%
Home attack advantage
+34%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
59%
1 goal
28%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
62%
1 goal
29%
2 goals
8%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Vipers 1 - 0 - 0 UPDF. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Vipers vs UPDF?

The Uganda Premier League match finished Vipers 5:1 UPDF. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Vipers vs UPDF?

Vipers score 1.90 goals per game on average and UPDF 0.80. The Uganda Premier League average is 2.09 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 35% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Vipers's matches and 40% of UPDF's.

What form are Vipers and UPDF in?

Over the last 5 games Vipers have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and UPDF 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Vipers vs UPDF?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.