Vision vs Basake Holy Stars: match statistics
Vision displays significantly better home form with a 50% win rate and an impressive +9 goal difference at their own stadium. The hosts have won three of their last five home matches, confirming their solidity in front of their own fans. Basake Holy Stars, on the other hand, have not won any away match this season (0% Win%), and their catastrophic -20 away goal difference along with a mere 0.23 goals scored per away match indicate massive offensive problems. Moreover, the visitors failed to score in 85% of their away matches, which, given the hosts' efficiency (50% Clean Sheets at home), significantly increases Vision's chances of keeping a clean sheet. All key statistics, including xG (1.1 vs 0.79), possession, and shot accuracy, speak in favor of the hosts, who should confidently win this match.
Vision vs Basake Holy Stars: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Vision played Basake Holy Stars in Ghana Premier League (Ghana). The match was played on 28 March 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Vision: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Basake Holy Stars: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Vision scores 1.08 and concedes 1.04 goals per match. Basake Holy Stars scores 0.85 and concedes 1.12. League average: 1.87 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Vision 35%, Basake Holy Stars 23%. Over 2.5: Vision 42%, Basake Holy Stars 31%. League level: BTTS 33%, Over 2.5 31%.
xG, shots and style
Basake Holy Stars has higher xG: 1.06 vs 1.04. Vision: 5.5 shots per match, Basake Holy Stars: 5.4.
Match halves
Vision: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.65. Basake Holy Stars: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.35.
Goals by minute
Vision: 46-60 (7 goals). Basake Holy Stars: 31-45+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ghana Premier League: 1.87 goals per match, BTTS 33%, Over 2.5 31%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-1-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Vision displays significantly better home form with a 50% win rate and an impressive +9 goal difference at their own stadium. The hosts have won three of their last five home matches, confirming their solidity in front of their own fans. Basake Holy Stars, on the other hand, have not won any away match this season (0% Win%), and their catastrophic -20 away goal difference along with a mere 0.23 goals scored per away match indicate massive offensive problems. Moreover, the visitors failed to score in 85% of their away matches, which, given the hosts' efficiency (50% Clean Sheets at home), significantly increases Vision's chances of keeping a clean sheet. All key statistics, including xG (1.1 vs 0.79), possession, and shot accuracy, speak in favor of the hosts, who should confidently win this match.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The seasonal data strongly indicates a problem for the visitors in scoring goals: Basake Holy Stars averages only 0.23 goals per match and has a staggering 85% of matches without a scored goal (FTS). Meanwhile, Vision defends very solidly (0.46 goals conceded per match and 69% clean sheets), which further lowers the chances of the visitors finding the net. Quality chance metrics also support BTTS "no": the visitors' xG is 0.79, and their conversion rate is only 6% with 1.89 shots on target per match. The trend from the last 5 matches is even more clear-cut, as Basake has 0% BTTS and averages 0.6 goals. Although Vision should have an offensive edge (1.46 goals/match; 4.7 SOT; opponents concede 1.77 goals/match), the most likely scenario is a match with only one team scoring.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The goals model favors a score around 2.04 goals, as Vision has a solid attack (1.46 goals/match, xG 1.3 and 4.7 shots on target), while Basake Holy Stars, meanwhile, attack poorly (0.23 goals/match, 85% FTS, 1.89 SoT). Defensively, Vision is very stable (0.46 goals conceded/match and 69% clean sheets), which limits the visitors' goal contribution and lowers the chances of a high total. The league and seasonal profiles are clearly 'under': Over 2.5 is only 31% for both teams, and Over 3.5 just 8% on both sides, supporting the safer line of 3.5. Although Vision's form in the last 5 matches increases the Over 2.5 risk (60%), Basake's poor efficiency (6% shot conversion, BTTS 15%) still limits scenarios of 4+ goals. The best choice is Under 3.5 as the strongest signal from the data (very low historical share of 4+ goal matches and low chance of an away goal).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Vision holds a clear qualitative advantage: 2.46 PPG and 77% wins, with an average of 1.46 goals scored and only 0.46 conceded per match, while Basake Holy Stars has 0.31 PPG, 0% wins, 0.23 goals scored and as many as 1.77 conceded. The scenario of the hosts leading at the break is supported by HT data: Vision leads in 54% of matches (HT PPG 2.0), while the visitors trail at half-time in 54% and practically do not score in the first half (0.08 HT goals) while conceding 0.69 HT goals. Defensively, Vision is very solid (69% clean sheets this season, 85% CS in the first half), and Basake very often fails to find the net (FTS 85%, FTS HT 92%), which limits the risk of a turnaround. The advantage in chance creation and shot quality is also on Vision's side (xG for 1.3 vs 0.79, shots on target 4.7 vs 1.89, conversion 17% vs 6%). Therefore, the most likely outcome is the 1/1 (home win at half-time and full-time) variant, with some probability mass alternatively falling on X/1 (draw at half-time, home win at full-time), as Vision is level at the break in 38% of matches.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Vision | Basake Holy Stars | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.19 | 0.20 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.46 | 0.39 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Vision is 27% better for: goals scored per match.
1.08 goals / match - Vision · 0.85 goals / match - Basake Holy Stars
Vision is 8% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.04 goals / match - Vision · 1.12 goals / match - Basake Holy Stars
Vision scores in 54% of matches (14 of 26 matches), while Basake Holy Stars keeps a clean sheet in 46% (12 of 26 matches).
Basake Holy Stars scores in 54% of matches (14 of 26 matches), while Vision keeps a clean sheet in 38% (10 of 26 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Vision
Over / Under - Basake Holy Stars
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Vision - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 31%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Basake Holy Stars - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Vision
Basake Holy Stars
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ghana Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Vision | Liga | Basake Holy Stars | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.12 | 1.87 | • 1.96 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 35% | 33% | ▼ 23% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 42% | 31% | • 31% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 38% | 43% | ▲ 46% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 60% | ▲ 65% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 69% | 60% | ▲ 65% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Vision 0 - 1 - 0 Basake Holy Stars. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Vision vs Basake Holy Stars?
The Ghana Premier League match finished Vision 0:0 Basake Holy Stars. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Vision vs Basake Holy Stars?
Vision score 1.08 goals per game on average and Basake Holy Stars 0.85. The Ghana Premier League average is 1.87 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 31% of games. Both teams score in 35% of Vision's matches and 23% of Basake Holy Stars's.
What form are Vision and Basake Holy Stars in?
Over the last 5 games Vision have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Basake Holy Stars 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Vision vs Basake Holy Stars?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Vision vs Basake Holy Stars: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


