Vision vs Gamba All Blacks: match statistics
Vision vs Gamba All Blacks: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Vision play Gamba All Blacks in Ghana Premier League (Ghana). The match date is 2 May 2026 at 17:00. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
Vision: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match. Gamba All Blacks: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Vision scores 1.12 and concedes 1.00 goals per match. Gamba All Blacks scores 1.00 and concedes 0.91. League average: 2.03 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Vision 32%, Gamba All Blacks 35%. Over 2.5: Vision 44%, Gamba All Blacks 26%. League level: BTTS 34%, Over 2.5 34%.
xG, shots and style
Gamba All Blacks has higher xG: 1.27 vs 1.14. Vision: 6.0 shots per match, Gamba All Blacks: 8.7.
Match halves
Vision: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 0.71. Gamba All Blacks: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.53.
Goals by minute
Vision: 76-90+ (10 goals). Gamba All Blacks: 31-45+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ghana Premier League: 2.03 goals per match, BTTS 34%, Over 2.5 34%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Match description
Vision have a clear home advantage: at home they score 1.43 goals and concede only 0.71 per match, with a home goal difference of +10. Gamba All Blacks on the road average just 0.64 goals scored and concede 1.29 per match, with an away goal differential of -9 and 64% of away matches without scoring. Additionally, Vision generate more shots on target (3.64 vs 2.82), convert them more efficiently (18% conversion vs Gamba’s 10%) and their home xG is 1.24 with xG against 1.08, while Gamba’s away xG for is 1.05 and xG against 1.58. Despite similar recent form—both teams averaging 1.4 points in the last 5 matches—Vision’s home metrics (50% wins, 7% losses) versus Gamba’s away metrics (14% wins, 71% losses) strongly favor the hosts. For these reasons I forecast a Vision win (1): probability 65% home win, 20% draw, 15% away win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Vision | Gamba All Blacks | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 29% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.19 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.45 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Gamba All Blacks is 11% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Vision · 2 pts / match - Gamba All Blacks
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Vision is 12% better for: goals scored per match.
1.12 goals / match - Vision · 1 goals / match - Gamba All Blacks
Gamba All Blacks is 10% better for: goals conceded per match.
1 goals / match - Vision · 0.91 goals / match - Gamba All Blacks
Vision scores in 59% of matches (20 of 34 matches), while Gamba All Blacks keeps a clean sheet in 32% (11 of 34 matches).
Gamba All Blacks scores in 56% of matches (19 of 34 matches), while Vision keeps a clean sheet in 44% (15 of 34 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Vision
Over / Under — Gamba All Blacks
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Vision - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Gamba All Blacks - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 35%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 1.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Vision
Gamba All Blacks
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ghana Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Vision | Liga | Gamba All Blacks | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.12 | 2.03 | ▼ 1.91 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 32% | 34% | • 35% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 44% | 34% | ▼ 26% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 44% | 41% | ▼ 32% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 53% | 62% | ▼ 59% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 68% | 59% | ▲ 65% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Vision 0 - 0 - 1 Gamba All Blacks. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Vision vs Gamba All Blacks?
The Ghana Premier League match finished Vision 1:2 Gamba All Blacks. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Vision vs Gamba All Blacks?
Vision score 1.12 goals per game on average and Gamba All Blacks 1.00. The Ghana Premier League average is 2.03 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 32% of Vision's matches and 35% of Gamba All Blacks's.
What form are Vision and Gamba All Blacks in?
Over the last 5 games Vision have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Gamba All Blacks 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Vision vs Gamba All Blacks?
The statistical background for Vision vs Gamba All Blacks — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.