Vision vs Medeama: match statistics
Medeama is the clear favorite for this encounter, sitting in 1st place in the table with an impressive record of 10 wins, 7 draws, and just 1 defeat. Their form in the last 5 matches is excellent (4 wins, 1 draw), scoring 8 goals while conceding only 1, resulting in a PPG of 2.6. Vision occupies the 11th position in the table and displays clearly weaker form (PPG 1.4), with a goal difference of 14:17 indicating offensive struggles. Medeama dominates away statistics with 50% clean sheets, averaging 1 goal scored and only 0.63 conceded per match, while Vision has only a 50% win rate in home matches and averages 1.25 goals scored. The visitors' qualitative and form advantage points towards their victory, although Vision's solid home defense (75% CS%) could make the match tight, hence a significant probability of a draw.
Vision vs Medeama: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Vision played Medeama in Ghana Premier League (Ghana). The match was played on 17 January 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Current form
Vision: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Medeama: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Vision scores 0.78 and concedes 0.94 goals per match. Medeama scores 1.39 and concedes 0.56. League average: 1.86 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Vision 22%, Medeama 44%. Over 2.5: Vision 28%, Medeama 39%. League level: BTTS 33%, Over 2.5 28%.
xG, shots and style
Medeama has higher xG: 1.62 vs 0.91. Vision: 4.6 shots per match, Medeama: 14.6.
Match halves
Vision: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.50. Medeama: half-time lead 39%, second-half goals 0.72.
Goals by minute
Vision: 76-90+ (4 goals). Medeama: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ghana Premier League: 1.86 goals per match, BTTS 33%, Over 2.5 28%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Medeama is the clear favorite for this encounter, sitting in 1st place in the table with an impressive record of 10 wins, 7 draws, and just 1 defeat. Their form in the last 5 matches is excellent (4 wins, 1 draw), scoring 8 goals while conceding only 1, resulting in a PPG of 2.6. Vision occupies the 11th position in the table and displays clearly weaker form (PPG 1.4), with a goal difference of 14:17 indicating offensive struggles. Medeama dominates away statistics with 50% clean sheets, averaging 1 goal scored and only 0.63 conceded per match, while Vision has only a 50% win rate in home matches and averages 1.25 goals scored. The visitors' qualitative and form advantage points towards their victory, although Vision's solid home defense (75% CS%) could make the match tight, hence a significant probability of a draw.
View the statistical overviewHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Vision | Medeama | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.20 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.47 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Medeama is 57% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Vision · 2.2 pts / match - Medeama
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Medeama is 78% better for: goals scored per match.
0.78 goals / match - Vision · 1.39 goals / match - Medeama
Medeama is 68% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.94 goals / match - Vision · 0.56 goals / match - Medeama
Vision scores in 44% of matches (8 of 18 matches), while Medeama keeps a clean sheet in 50% (9 of 18 matches).
Medeama scores in 78% of matches (14 of 18 matches), while Vision keeps a clean sheet in 44% (8 of 18 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Vision
Over / Under - Medeama
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Medeama is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.17 pts / match - Vision · 1.61 pts / match - Medeama
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Vision - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Medeama - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 39% of matches and wins 56%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 100% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 100% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Vision
Medeama
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ghana Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Vision | Liga | Medeama | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.72 | 1.86 | • 1.94 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 22% | 33% | ▲ 44% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 28% | 28% | ▲ 39% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 44% | 42% | ▲ 50% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 44% | 60% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | • 61% | 60% | ▲ 72% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Vision 0 - 0 - 1 Medeama. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Vision vs Medeama?
The Ghana Premier League match finished Vision 1:2 Medeama. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Vision vs Medeama?
Vision score 0.78 goals per game on average and Medeama 1.39. The Ghana Premier League average is 1.86 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 28% of games. Both teams score in 22% of Vision's matches and 44% of Medeama's.
What form are Vision and Medeama in?
Over the last 5 games Vision have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Medeama 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Vision vs Medeama?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.