Volos NFC vs Kifisia: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Volos NFC play Kifisia in Super League (Greece). The match date is 6 December 2025 at 19:30. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Volos NFC: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match. Kifisia: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Volos NFC scores 1.03 and concedes 1.72 goals per match. Kifisia scores 1.11 and concedes 1.42. League average: 2.57 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Volos NFC 56%, Kifisia 58%. Over 2.5: Volos NFC 53%, Kifisia 53%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 50%.

xG, shots and style

Kifisia has higher xG: 1.48 vs 1.22. Volos NFC: 11.2 shots per match, Kifisia: 13.4.

Match halves

Volos NFC: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.53. Kifisia: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.56.

Goals by minute

Volos NFC: 76-90+ (7 goals). Kifisia: 16-30 (10 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Super League: 2.57 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 50%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

53Possession (%)47
Volos NFCKifisia
16Shots21
Volos NFCKifisia
5Shots on target8
Volos NFCKifisia
1.65xG2.15
Volos NFCKifisia
8Corners8
Volos NFCKifisia
40Dangerous attacks37
Volos NFCKifisia
13Fouls15
Volos NFCKifisia
4Cards4
Volos NFCKifisia

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.03Goals scored / match1.11
Volos NFCKifisia
1.72Goals conceded / match1.42
Volos NFCKifisia
46%Average possession48%
Volos NFCKifisia
3.63Shots on target / match4.81
Volos NFCKifisia

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.16Shots per match13.42
Volos NFCKifisia
3.63Shots on target4.81
Volos NFCKifisia
9.2%Shot conversion8.3%
Volos NFCKifisia
46%Possession48%
Volos NFCKifisia
1.22xG for1.48
Volos NFCKifisia
1.5xG against1.39
Volos NFCKifisia

Shooting quality

Volos NFC: BalancedKifisia: Balanced
Volos NFCKifisia
Accuracy (shots on target)33%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.280.23

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Volos NFC
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
28% W16% R56% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-5-18
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-5-6
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
DWDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 3.2xG: 1.23Opponent xG: 1.83BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%
Kifisia
WWLDW
Season result split
25% W39% R36% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-14-13
1.14 pts / match · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-8-6
Last 5 away
2-3-0
DDWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.39Opponent xG: 1.42BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Kifisia is 8% better for: goals scored per match.

1.03 goals / match - Volos NFC · 1.11 goals / match - Kifisia

Kifisia is 21% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.72 goals / match - Volos NFC · 1.42 goals / match - Kifisia

Volos NFC scoring profile: strong

Volos NFC scores in 69% of matches (22 of 32 matches), while Kifisia keeps a clean sheet in 25% (9 of 36 matches).

Kifisia scoring profile: very strong

Kifisia scores in 69% of matches (25 of 36 matches), while Volos NFC keeps a clean sheet in 13% (4 of 32 matches).

33Goals scored (season)40
Volos NFCKifisia
55Goals conceded (season)51
Volos NFCKifisia
2.75Average goals in match2.53
Volos NFCKifisia
6Goals scored (last 5)6
Volos NFCKifisia
16Goals conceded (last 5)6
Volos NFCKifisia

How often they score at least...

69%1 goal69%
Volos NFCKifisia
25%2 goals31%
Volos NFCKifisia
3%3 goals11%
Volos NFCKifisia
3%4 goals0%
Volos NFCKifisia

How often they concede at least...

88%1 goal75%
Volos NFCKifisia
56%2 goals42%
Volos NFCKifisia
22%3 goals22%
Volos NFCKifisia
3%4 goals3%
Volos NFCKifisia

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

49%
League average

Goal patterns

28%BTTS at half-time28%
Volos NFCKifisia
6%BTTS in both halves6%
Volos NFCKifisia
13%Scored in both halves19%
Volos NFCKifisia

BTTS and goal count

44%Min. 3 goals and BTTS39%
Volos NFCKifisia
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
Volos NFCKifisia
80%BTTS - last 540%
Volos NFCKifisia

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

72%Min. 1 goal before half-time69%
Volos NFCKifisia
41%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
Volos NFCKifisia
16%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
Volos NFCKifisia

2nd half

78%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
Volos NFCKifisia
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time44%
Volos NFCKifisia
9%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
Volos NFCKifisia

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Kifisia is 15% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.06 pts / match - Volos NFC · 1.22 pts / match - Kifisia

Volos NFC - half-time state
22% leading41% draw38% trailing
Kifisia - half-time state
25% leading47% draw28% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.06Points per match (1st half)1.22
Volos NFCKifisia
0.5Goals scored (1st half)0.56
Volos NFCKifisia
0.78Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
Volos NFCKifisia
1.28Average goals (1st half)1.22
Volos NFCKifisia
41%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Volos NFCKifisia
59%No goal before half-time53%
Volos NFCKifisia

After half-time (2nd half)

0.91Points per match (2nd half)1.17
Volos NFCKifisia
0.53Goals scored (2nd half)0.56
Volos NFCKifisia
0.94Goals conceded (2nd half)0.75
Volos NFCKifisia
1.47Average goals (2nd half)1.31
Volos NFCKifisia
34%Clean sheet after half-time50%
Volos NFCKifisia
59%No goal after half-time58%
Volos NFCKifisia

Volos NFC - second-half results

16% W44% R41% P
34
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
29
Second-half points
-13
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.06
PPG before half-time
Lead holding127%

Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 28%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Kifisia - second-half results

25% W42% R33% P
44
Half-time points
20
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.22
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 25%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Volos NFC - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.20
Goals scored / match0.60.6
Goals conceded / match1.41.8
Average goals in match2.02.4
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%80%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet0%0%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-4-6
Half-time: 20% leading - 0% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 20% draw - 80% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Kifisia - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.001.60
Goals scored / match0.40.8
Goals conceded / match0.60.6
Average goals in match1.01.4
1 goal60%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Volos NFC
ScoredConceded
5
6
0-15
6
10
16-30
5
9
31-45
4
8
46-60
6
13
61-75
7
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Kifisia
ScoredConceded
5
5
0-15
10
6
16-30
5
13
31-45
5
10
46-60
6
7
61-75
9
10
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (10 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.64
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
57%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-24%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Volos NFC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.41
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+6.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
73%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
151%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-1.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Kifisia

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.40
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
97%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
100%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.86
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
23% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
23%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).

Teams vs league

Volos NFCLigaKifisia
Average goals in match 2.752.57 2.53
Both teams scored 56%49% 58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 53%50% 53%
Clean sheets 13%30% 25%
Goal before half-time 72%71% 69%
Goal after half-time 78%75% 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.57
Average goals per match
49%
Both teams scored
50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
30%
Clean sheets
1.42
Home goals / match
1.14
Away goals / match
+25%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defence advantage
+10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
33%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Volos NFC 0 - 0 - 1 Kifisia. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Volos NFC vs Kifisia?

The Super League match finished Volos NFC 1:1 Kifisia. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Volos NFC vs Kifisia?

Volos NFC score 1.03 goals per game on average and Kifisia 1.11. The Super League average is 2.57 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 56% of Volos NFC's matches and 58% of Kifisia's.

What form are Volos NFC and Kifisia in?

Over the last 5 games Volos NFC have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Kifisia 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Volos NFC vs Kifisia?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.