Finland - VeikkausliigaData current as of 11 September 2026

VPS vs Ilves: match statistics

VPS crest
VPS
3 : 2half-time 3:0
Ilves crest
Ilves

VPS vs Ilves: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

VPS played Ilves in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match was played on 24 April 2026. Final score: 3:2.

Current form

VPS: 0-2-1, 0.67 points/match. Ilves: 0-1-2, 0.33 points/match.

Goal statistics

VPS scores 0.00 and concedes 0.33 goals per match. Ilves scores 1.33 and concedes 2.33. League average: 2.42 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: VPS 0%, Ilves 100%. Over 2.5: VPS 0%, Ilves 100%. League level: BTTS 42%, Over 2.5 47%.

xG, shots and style

Ilves has higher xG: 1.28 vs 0.80. VPS: 5.7 shots per match, Ilves: 11.0.

Match halves

VPS: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.00. Ilves: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.67.

Goals by minute

VPS: 0-15 (0 goals). Ilves: 16-30 (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Veikkausliiga: 2.42 goals per match, BTTS 42%, Over 2.5 47%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 50%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict a draw (X). VPS at home records 100% draws and 100% clean sheets with an average of 0 goals scored and 0 conceded per home match, 2 shots on target and 54% possession; in the last 5 matches they have a record of 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss and 1.6 points per game. Ilves have not won away (0% wins), have 50% draws and 50% losses, score an average of 1.5 goals away, but concede 2.0 on average and conceded 12 goals in the last 5 matches, yielding only 0.4 pts per game in that period. In terms of quality of chances VPS at home have xG 1.03 versus xG against 2.11, while Ilves away have xG 1.05 versus xG against 1.53, so Ilves create similar chances but have clear defensive issues. Considering VPS’s 100% home draws and Ilves’s lack of away wins and the points difference (1.6 vs 0.4 PPG in the last 5), I assign the highest probability to a draw (65%), with 10% for a home win and 25% for an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have season BTTS at 100% (VPS 100% and Ilves 100%), which is a strong signal that these teams’ matches frequently end with goals from both sides. Match data support this: VPS has average xG 1.74 versus 1.05 for Ilves; VPS averages 5.0 shots on target and 14.0 shots per match, while Ilves averages 3.0 shots on target and 9.5 shots, with Ilves conversion rate at 16% versus 7% for VPS. However, the last 5 matches show divergence — VPS scored 17 and conceded just 1 (3.4 for and 0.2 against on average), producing 0% BTTS in the last five, whereas Ilves in that period has 8 scored and 12 conceded (1.6 and 2.4) and 100% BTTS. Given the league BTTS level of 42%, and that both teams have 100% of matches over 2.5 goals this season, the dominant seasonal BTTS signals and xG/SOT stats indicate a higher probability of both teams scoring than VPS’s recent form alone would suggest. Therefore I forecast BTTS - Yes with a probability of 75% vs 25% — driven by both teams’ seasonal 100% BTTS, the xG edge 1.74 vs 1.05 and Ilves’ high efficiency (16% conversion), despite VPS’s recent run warranting caution.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Based on both teams' xG (VPS 1.74 vs Ilves 1.05) and conceded xG (1.53 for both), I expect approximately 1.64 goals for VPS and 1.29 for Ilves, totaling ~2.93 goals. A Poisson model for total xG = 2.93 projects probabilities: Over 1.5 ≈ 79%, Over 2.5 ≈ 56% and Over 3.5 ≈ 34%. Additionally, seasonal data reinforces the bias toward more goals — both teams scored in 100% of matches and both teams’ matches exceeded 2.5 goals in 100% of fixtures this season; VPS scored 17 goals in the last 5 matches (avg 3.4), Ilves conceded 12 goals (avg 2.4), and VPS averages 14 shots (5 on target) vs Ilves 9.5 (3 on target). Taking this into account I lift the estimates to Over 1.5 = 86%, Over 2.5 = 65% and Over 3.5 = 38%; the strongest signal from the data is Over 2.5 (back the Over at the 2.5 line), since xG ≈ 2.93 aligns with seasonal 100% Over 2.5 and 100% both-teams-to-score matches.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

First-half statistics strongly favor Ilves: VPS did not score before the break (average 0.0) and conceded an average of 2.0 goals by half-time, while Ilves averaged 1.0 goal at the break and led at the break in 50% of matches. Over the full match VPS concedes an average of 3.0 goals per game, despite generating higher xG (1.74 vs 1.05) and more shots (14 vs 9.5); with the hosts’ low finishing rate (conversion 7% vs Ilves’ 16%) this indicates problems in chance completion. Both teams regularly score (both have goals in 100% of matches), but Ilves’ efficiency (an average 1.5 goals per away match this season) gives them the edge over 90 minutes. Therefore the most likely scenario is Ilves to lead at the break and Ilves to win after 90 minutes, hence the selection 2/2.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

3 : 0
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

35Possession (%)65
VPSIlves
23Shots10
VPSIlves
8Shots on target4
VPSIlves
2.35xG1.19
VPSIlves
10Corners5
VPSIlves
47Dangerous attacks39
VPSIlves
16Fouls9
VPSIlves
2Cards1
VPSIlves

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

0Goals scored / match1.33
VPSIlves
0.33Goals conceded / match2.33
VPSIlves
45%Average possession45%
VPSIlves
1.33Shots on target / match3.67
VPSIlves

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

5.67Shots per match11
VPSIlves
1.33Shots on target3.67
VPSIlves
0%Shot conversion12.1%
VPSIlves
45%Possession45%
VPSIlves
0.8xG for1.28
VPSIlves
1.67xG against1.53
VPSIlves

Shooting quality

VPS: BalancedIlves: Counter-attacking
VPSIlves
Accuracy (shots on target)23%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.140.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.000.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

VPS is 103% better for: last-5 form.

0.67 pts / match - VPS · 0.33 pts / match - Ilves

VPS
DDL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W67% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-2-1
0.67 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-1
0.67 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 at home
0-1-0
D
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.0Goals conceded: 0.3xG: 0.80Opponent xG: 1.67BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
Ilves
LLD
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W33% D67% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-2
0.33 pts / match · goal difference -3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-2
0.33 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-1
Last 5 away
0-1-1
LD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.3Goals conceded: 2.3xG: 1.28Opponent xG: 1.53BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

VPS is 606% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.33 goals / match - VPS · 2.33 goals / match - Ilves

VPS scoring profile: mixed

VPS scores in 0% of matches (0 of 3 matches), while Ilves keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 3 matches).

Ilves scoring profile: strong

Ilves scores in 100% of matches (3 of 3 matches), while VPS keeps a clean sheet in 67% (2 of 3 matches).

0Goals scored (season)4
VPSIlves
1Goals conceded (season)7
VPSIlves
0.33Average goals in match3.67
VPSIlves
0Goals scored (last 5)4
VPSIlves
1Goals conceded (last 5)7
VPSIlves

How often they score at least...

0%1 goal100%
VPSIlves
0%2 goals33%
VPSIlves
0%3 goals0%
VPSIlves
0%4 goals0%
VPSIlves

How often they concede at least...

33%1 goal100%
VPSIlves
0%2 goals100%
VPSIlves
0%3 goals33%
VPSIlves
0%4 goals0%
VPSIlves

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time33%
VPSIlves
0%BTTS in both halves33%
VPSIlves
0%Scored in both halves33%
VPSIlves

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS100%
VPSIlves
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
VPSIlves
0%BTTS - last 5100%
VPSIlves

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

0%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
VPSIlves
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time67%
VPSIlves
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
VPSIlves

2nd half

33%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
VPSIlves
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time100%
VPSIlves
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
VPSIlves

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ilves is 33% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - VPS · 1.33 pts / match - Ilves

VPS - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing
Ilves - half-time state
33% leading33% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.33
VPSIlves
0Goals scored (1st half)0.67
VPSIlves
0Goals conceded (1st half)1
VPSIlves
0Average goals (1st half)1.67
VPSIlves
100%Clean sheet before half-time33%
VPSIlves
100%No goal before half-time33%
VPSIlves

After half-time (2nd half)

0.67Points per match (2nd half)0.67
VPSIlves
0Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
VPSIlves
0.33Goals conceded (2nd half)1.33
VPSIlves
0.33Average goals (2nd half)2
VPSIlves
67%Clean sheet after half-time0%
VPSIlves
100%No goal after half-time33%
VPSIlves

VPS - second-half results

0% W67% D33% L
3
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
2
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Ilves - second-half results

0% W67% D33% L
4
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
2
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding0%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 0%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

VPS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.67
Goals scored / match0.00.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.3
Average goals in match0.00.3
1 goal0%33%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%67%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 67% draw - 33% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Ilves - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.330.67
Goals scored / match0.70.7
Goals conceded / match1.01.3
Average goals in match1.72.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals67%100%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet33%0%
No goal33%33%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 33% leading - 33% draw - 33% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 67% draw - 33% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 33% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

VPS
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
0
0
76-90

Concedes most in 61-75 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Ilves
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
2
0
16-30
0
2
31-45
0
2
46-60
1
1
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.00
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
82%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+50%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
0%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

VPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.87
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.54
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.80
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+1.34
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
0%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
27%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Ilves

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.75
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.80
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
110%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
193%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

VPSLigaIlves
Average goals in match 0.332.42 3.67
Both teams scored 0%42% 100%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 0%47% 100%
Clean sheets 67%34% 0%
Goal before half-time 0%74% 100%
Goal after half-time 33%79% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.42
Average goals per match
42%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
34%
Clean sheets
1.21
Home goals / match
1.21
Away goals / match
+0%
Home attack advantage
+0%
Home defence advantage
+10%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. IlvesYellow cardFaris Krkalic
  2. IlvesSubstitutionOn: Jesse KiloOff: Roope Riski
  3. VPSYellow cardLuka Smyth
  4. IlvesSubstitutionOn: Oskari MultalaOff: Otto Tiitinen
  5. IlvesGoalJardell Kanga
  6. VPSYellow cardSimon Lindholm

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): VPS 1 - 0 - 1 Ilves. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

Tampereen Ilves
3 : 2
Vaasan Palloseura
Vaasan Palloseura
1 : 0
Tampereen Ilves

FAQ

What was the result of VPS vs Ilves?

The Veikkausliiga match finished VPS 3:2 Ilves. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between VPS and Ilves?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches VPS won 1, Ilves won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before VPS vs Ilves?

VPS score 0.00 goals per game on average and Ilves 1.33. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.42 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 0% of VPS's matches and 100% of Ilves's.

What form are VPS and Ilves in?

Over the last 5 games VPS have a 0-2-1 record (0.67 points per game) and Ilves 0-1-2 (0.33 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for VPS vs Ilves?

The statistical background for VPS vs Ilves — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.