Finland - VeikkausliigaElisa StadionData current as of 06 September 2026

VPS vs SJK: match statistics

VPS crest
VPS
1 : 0half-time 0:0
SJK crest
SJK

VPS vs SJK: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

VPS played SJK in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The match was played on 10 July 2026. Venue: Elisa Stadion. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

VPS: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. SJK: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

VPS scores 1.50 and concedes 0.79 goals per match. SJK scores 1.29 and concedes 1.57. League average: 2.69 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: VPS 57%, SJK 64%. Over 2.5: VPS 36%, SJK 57%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 48%.

xG, shots and style

SJK has higher xG: 1.64 vs 1.48. VPS: 11.9 shots per match, SJK: 13.8.

Match halves

VPS: half-time lead 43%, second-half goals 0.57. SJK: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.86.

Goals by minute

VPS: 31-45+ (7 goals). SJK: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Veikkausliiga: 2.69 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 48%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 2-0-1. Average goals 3.67, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

The favorite is VPS: at home they have 57% wins and 0% losses with a home goal difference of +10, while SJK records only 14% wins away and has a -5 goal difference. VPS averages 2.29 goals per home game with 5.29 shots on target and a conversion rate of 18%, whereas SJK away averages 1.14 goals with 4.43 shots on target and an 11% conversion. Defensively VPS concedes 0.86 goals per home match, and SJK concedes 1.86 on the road; this is supported by xG — VPS has 1.51 xG at home versus 1.33 xG for SJK away, while xGA is 1.29 for VPS against 1.62 for SJK. In the last 5 matches the hosts earned 10 points (3W,1D,1L) and scored 14 goals, while the visitors have 8 points (2-2-1) and 10 goals. Considering higher shot efficiency (18% vs 11%), more shots on target (5.29 vs 4.43) and the fact that SJK fail to register a shot in 43% of away games versus 14% for hosts, I predict a VPS win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The Both Teams To Score (BTTS) scenario is more likely: VPS has a seasonal BTTS rate of 71%, SJK 57%, and the league average is 53%. In the last 5 matches VPS recorded BTTS in 80% of games, SJK in 100%, with average goals of 2.8 for VPS and 2.0 for SJK in that period. The home side’s attack generates xG 1.94 and averages 17.0 shots with 5.57 shots on target per match, while SJK concedes 1.86 goals on average this season and has xG against of 1.62, which increases the likelihood of VPS goals; at the same time SJK has xG 1.33 versus xG against for VPS of 1.27, so the visitors can also create chances. Both teams have only 14% clean sheets, and SJK have conceded 22 goals versus 11 conceded by VPS, which reduces the probability of a no-goal outcome; on this basis I recommend a BTTS — Yes bet.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Season-long metrics show Over 1.5 occurred in 86% of matches for both VPS and SJK, and in the last 5 meetings both teams registered Over 2.5 in 80% of games, indicating a propensity for fixtures with at least 2–3 goals. xG analysis: VPS has an average xG of 1.94 versus xG conceded to SJK 1.62, yielding expected goals for VPS ≈1.78; SJK has xG 1.33 versus xG conceded to VPS 1.27, yielding ≈1.30, totaling ≈3.08 goals. VPS averages 17 shots and 5.57 shots on target per match compared to SJK’s 10.57 and 4.43, and with seasonal BTTS rates of 71% (VPS) and 57% (SJK) both sides have realistic scoring chances. Seasonally Over 2.5 appeared in 57% of matches involving both teams, but in the form of the last 5 matches this rises to 80%, therefore the projected total of 3.08 goals favors Over 2.5 rather than Under. Based on this I select Over 2.5 as the strongest signal (estimated probability ~72%), while assessing Over 3.5 conservatively at ~38% because the expected total falls just below the 3.5 threshold.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The main arguments in favor of VPS are superiority in xG and chance creation: VPS has an xG of 1.94 versus 1.33 for SJK (a 0.61 differential) and averages 17.0 shots per match compared to SJK’s 10.57. In the last 5 matches VPS has won 60% of games (3 of 5) and led at the break in 60% of those appearances (3 of 5); their average first-half goals in the last 5 is 1.4 versus SJK’s 0.8, suggesting greater home efficiency before the break. VPS has scored at least one goal by half-time in 100% of home matches (7 of 7), while SJK concedes an average of 1.86 goals per match this season, increasing the likelihood of the home side taking and maintaining a lead. Additionally, the season-long "both teams to score" rates are 71% for VPS and 57% for SJK, so I expect goals from both sides but with VPS superiority; therefore the most probable HT/FT scenario is 1/1.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
VPSSJK
13Shots11
VPSSJK
6Shots on target4
VPSSJK
1.56xG1.25
VPSSJK
2Corners8
VPSSJK
43Dangerous attacks38
VPSSJK
12Fouls11
VPSSJK
4Cards3
VPSSJK

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.5Goals scored / match1.29
VPSSJK
0.79Goals conceded / match1.57
VPSSJK
47%Average possession51%
VPSSJK
5Shots on target / match5
VPSSJK

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.86Shots per match13.79
VPSSJK
5Shots on target5
VPSSJK
12.7%Shot conversion9.3%
VPSSJK
47%Possession51%
VPSSJK
1.48xG for1.64
VPSSJK
1.31xG against1.45
VPSSJK

Shooting quality

VPS: Counter-attackingSJK: Balanced
VPSSJK
Accuracy (shots on target)42%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

VPS is 38% better for: last-5 form.

2.2 pts / match - VPS · 1.6 pts / match - SJK

VPS
DWWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
43% W43% R14% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-6-2
1.71 pts / match · goal difference +10
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-3-0
Last 5 at home
3-2-0
DWDWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.6Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.49Opponent xG: 1.55BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
SJK
WLDDW
Season result split
21% W36% R43% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-5-6
1.00 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-3-3
Last 5 away
1-3-1
DLWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.63Opponent xG: 1.57BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

VPS is 16% better for: goals scored per match.

1.5 goals / match - VPS · 1.29 goals / match - SJK

VPS is 99% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.79 goals / match - VPS · 1.57 goals / match - SJK

VPS scoring profile: very strong

VPS scores in 71% of matches (10 of 14 matches), while SJK keeps a clean sheet in 14% (2 of 14 matches).

SJK scoring profile: strong

SJK scores in 71% of matches (10 of 14 matches), while VPS keeps a clean sheet in 29% (4 of 14 matches).

21Goals scored (season)18
VPSSJK
11Goals conceded (season)22
VPSSJK
2.29Average goals in match2.86
VPSSJK
13Goals scored (last 5)10
VPSSJK
4Goals conceded (last 5)8
VPSSJK

How often they score at least...

71%1 goal71%
VPSSJK
36%2 goals36%
VPSSJK
21%3 goals21%
VPSSJK
14%4 goals0%
VPSSJK

How often they concede at least...

71%1 goal86%
VPSSJK
7%2 goals50%
VPSSJK
0%3 goals21%
VPSSJK
0%4 goals0%
VPSSJK

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time14%
VPSSJK
0%BTTS in both halves14%
VPSSJK
14%Scored in both halves29%
VPSSJK

BTTS and goal count

29%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
VPSSJK
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS14%
VPSSJK
80%BTTS - last 5100%
VPSSJK

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

71%Min. 1 goal before half-time86%
VPSSJK
36%Min. 2 goals before half-time21%
VPSSJK
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
VPSSJK

2nd half

64%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
VPSSJK
36%Min. 2 goals after half-time57%
VPSSJK
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time29%
VPSSJK

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

VPS is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.71 pts / match - VPS · 1.14 pts / match - SJK

VPS - half-time state
43% leading43% draw14% trailing
SJK - half-time state
29% leading29% draw43% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.71Points per match (1st half)1.14
VPSSJK
0.93Goals scored (1st half)0.43
VPSSJK
0.36Goals conceded (1st half)0.64
VPSSJK
1.29Average goals (1st half)1.07
VPSSJK
64%Clean sheet before half-time43%
VPSSJK
43%No goal before half-time57%
VPSSJK

After half-time (2nd half)

1.21Points per match (2nd half)1.36
VPSSJK
0.57Goals scored (2nd half)0.86
VPSSJK
0.43Goals conceded (2nd half)0.93
VPSSJK
1Average goals (2nd half)1.79
VPSSJK
64%Clean sheet after half-time36%
VPSSJK
71%No goal after half-time43%
VPSSJK

VPS - second-half results

29% W36% R36% P
24
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+8
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.71
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at half-time in 43% of matches and wins 43%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

SJK - second-half results

36% W29% R36% P
16
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-3
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.14
PPG before half-time
Lead holding72%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 21%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

VPS - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.002.00
Goals scored / match1.41.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match2.01.4
1 goal100%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+4+5
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 7
SJK - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.201.40
Goals scored / match0.81.2
Goals conceded / match0.21.4
Average goals in match1.02.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet80%0%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+3-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 40% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

VPS
ScoredConceded
4
1
0-15
2
2
16-30
7
2
31-45
1
1
46-60
4
4
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

SJK
ScoredConceded
1
5
0-15
1
2
16-30
4
2
31-45
2
11
46-60
2
0
61-75
8
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.58
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.5 : 1.0
Estimated goal split
home : away
96%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
61%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+43%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

VPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.54
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.52
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
97%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
69%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.49
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.4
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

SJK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.47
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.35
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.12
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
113%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
101%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
44% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
44%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

VPSLigaSJK
Average goals in match 2.292.69 2.86
Both teams scored 57%53% 64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 36%48% 57%
Clean sheets 29%26% 14%
Goal before half-time 71%74% 86%
Goal after half-time 64%79% 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.69
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.55
Home goals / match
1.14
Away goals / match
+36%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defence advantage
+27%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. SJKYellow cardSouleymane Bagayogo
  2. VPSYellow cardMartti Haukioja
  3. SJKYellow cardSayibu Yakubu
  4. VPSSubstitutionOn: Xavier OdhiamboOff: Jonathan Muzinga
  5. VPSYellow cardLassana Mané
  6. VPSYellow cardXavier Odhiambo
  7. VPSSubstitutionOn: Yassin DaoussiOff: Luka Smyth
  8. SJKSubstitutionOn: Elias MastokangasOff: Markus Arsalo
  9. VPSSubstitutionOn: Vilmer RönnbergOff: Jayden Turfkruier

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (3): VPS 2 - 0 - 1 SJK. Average goals 3.67, both teams scored in 100% matches.

SJK
1 : 2
VPS
Vaasan Palloseura
1 : 2
Seinäjoen Jalkapallokerho
Seinäjoen Jalkapallokerho
2 : 3
Vaasan Palloseura

FAQ

What was the result of VPS vs SJK?

The Veikkausliiga match finished VPS 1:0 SJK. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between VPS and SJK?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches VPS won 2, SJK won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before VPS vs SJK?

VPS score 1.50 goals per game on average and SJK 1.29. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.69 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 57% of VPS's matches and 64% of SJK's.

What form are VPS and SJK in?

Over the last 5 games VPS have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and SJK 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for VPS vs SJK?

The statistical background for VPS vs SJK — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.