Wadi Degla vs Al Ittihad: match statistics
Wadi Degla vs Al Ittihad: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Wadi Degla played Al Ittihad in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The match was played on 29 April 2026. Final score: 4:1.
Current form
Wadi Degla: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Al Ittihad: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Wadi Degla scores 1.08 and concedes 0.77 goals per match. Al Ittihad scores 0.81 and concedes 1.12. League average: 1.98 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Wadi Degla 50%, Al Ittihad 42%. Over 2.5: Wadi Degla 31%, Al Ittihad 38%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 32%.
xG, shots and style
Wadi Degla has higher xG: 1.28 vs 1.17. Wadi Degla: 10.7 shots per match, Al Ittihad: 9.7.
Match halves
Wadi Degla: half-time lead 19%, second-half goals 0.69. Al Ittihad: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.54.
Goals by minute
Wadi Degla: 76-90+ (8 goals). Al Ittihad: 76-90+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Egyptian Premier League: 1.98 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 32%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Wadi Degla enter the match as favorites: at home they score on average 1.08 goals and concede only 0.77 per game, and across the season they have 28 goals scored and a positive home goal difference (+4). Wadi Degla’s form is strong — in the last 5 matches they have 3 wins and 2 draws, collecting 11 points (2.2 points per game) and kept a clean sheet in all five matches (goals conceded in last 5 = 0). Al Ittihad has significantly lower attacking output: 21 goals this season, only 0.64 goals per away game on average, a negative away goal difference of -7 and concedes 1.14 on average away; in their last 5 matches the visitors have conceded 4 goals. Wadi also creates better chances: on average 11.31 shots and 3.46 on target at home with a conversion rate of 10%, whereas Al Ittihad away averages 9.71 shots, 2.64 on target and about a 7% conversion. Considering the advantage in xG (1.31 vs 1.08), better defense (0.77 vs 1.14) and higher average points in the last five matches (2.2 vs 1.4), I predict a home win; estimated probabilities: home 60%, draw 25%, away 15%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest signal against BTTS comes from the home side's form: Wadi Degla has 0% BTTS in the last 5 matches and has not conceded a single goal (ga_l5_home = 0.0), which significantly reduces the likelihood of both teams scoring. Season-to-date BTTS rates are moderate: 42% for Wadi and 43% for Al Ittihad versus a league average of 46%, meaning historically BTTS occurs below 50%. Al Ittihad scores only 0.64 goals per match on average and has 43% of matches without a goal despite xG_for = 1.08, while Wadi has xG_for = 1.27 and xG_against = 1.2, indicating a home advantage in chance creation and the ability to stifle the opponent. Shot metrics (3.5 SOT vs 2.64 SOT) and conversion rates (10% vs 7%) confirm Wadi’s superior finishing, and the visitors often fail to convert opportunities, so I tip "No" (No Goal) with a confidence of 65% vs 35% for "Yes" (BTTS - Yes).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG model for this match yields a total of approximately 2.50 goals, split as 1.36 xG for Wadi Degla and 1.14 xG for Al Ittihad. Historically Wadi Degla had Over 1.5 in 75% of matches, Al Ittihad in 43%, while seasonal Over 2.5 rates are 42% and 36% for home and away respectively — indicating the home side more often produces matches with at least 2 goals. Assuming a Poisson distribution with a total of 2.50 gives estimated probabilities of 71% for Over 1.5, 46% for Over 2.5 and 24% for Over 3.5, which aligns with the above stats and the higher xG for the hosts. Supporting indicators include an average of 3.5 on-target shots for Wadi Degla versus 2.64 for Al Ittihad and a higher shot conversion rate of 10% vs 7%, increasing the likelihood of chances being converted. As a result the strongest signal is Over 1.5 — combining the 75% home over rate, total xG=2.50 and the Poisson model yields 71% probability, making it the safest option.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I expect a draw at half-time because the hosts were level at the break in 50% of their matches and kept a clean sheet at half-time in 58% of games, with the hosts’ average goals by half-time only 0.33 versus 0.21 for the visitors. Wadi Degla has a clear advantage in the second half: 83% of their matches featured at least one goal after the break (vs 64% for Al Ittihad), second-half goals per match average 1.25 for the home side vs 1.0 for the away side, and the hosts scored 6 goals in minutes 76–90 compared to 2 for their opponents. xG and season-long metrics support this tendency: Wadi Degla’s xG is 1.27 versus 1.08 for Al Ittihad, the hosts score on average 1.00 goal per match versus 0.64 for the visitors, and Al Ittihad concedes 1.44 xG per match. Additionally, form and points emphasize the home advantage — in the last five matches Wadi Degla have a 60% win rate vs 20% for the visitors, and season home points are 1.42 vs 0.79, which increases the likelihood of a turnaround after the break and gives the strongest signal for HT/FT X/1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Wadi Degla | Al Ittihad | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Wadi Degla is 57% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / match - Wadi Degla · 1.4 pts / match - Al Ittihad
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Wadi Degla is 33% better for: goals scored per match.
1.08 goals / match - Wadi Degla · 0.81 goals / match - Al Ittihad
Wadi Degla is 45% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.77 goals / match - Wadi Degla · 1.12 goals / match - Al Ittihad
Wadi Degla scores in 65% of matches (17 of 26 matches), while Al Ittihad keeps a clean sheet in 35% (9 of 26 matches).
Al Ittihad scores in 62% of matches (16 of 26 matches), while Wadi Degla keeps a clean sheet in 38% (10 of 26 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Wadi Degla
Over / Under - Al Ittihad
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Wadi Degla is 35% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.15 pts / match - Wadi Degla · 0.85 pts / match - Al Ittihad
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Wadi Degla - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 19% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Al Ittihad - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 27%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 100% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Wadi Degla
Al Ittihad
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).
Teams vs league
| Wadi Degla | Liga | Al Ittihad | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 1.85 | 1.98 | • 1.92 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 50% | 46% | ▼ 42% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 31% | 32% | ▲ 38% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 38% | 35% | • 35% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 56% | ▼ 54% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 58% | 70% | ▲ 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Wadi Degla 1 - 0 - 0 Al Ittihad. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Wadi Degla vs Al Ittihad?
The Egyptian Premier League match finished Wadi Degla 4:1 Al Ittihad. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Wadi Degla vs Al Ittihad?
Wadi Degla score 1.08 goals per game on average and Al Ittihad 0.81. The Egyptian Premier League average is 1.98 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 32% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Wadi Degla's matches and 42% of Al Ittihad's.
What form are Wadi Degla and Al Ittihad in?
Over the last 5 games Wadi Degla have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Al Ittihad 1-4-0 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Wadi Degla vs Al Ittihad?
The statistical background for Wadi Degla vs Al Ittihad — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


