Egypt - Egyptian Premier LeagueData current as of 13 September 2026

Wadi Degla vs Ceramica Cleopatra: match statistics

130%(3.00)
X28%(2.50)
242%(2.90)

Ceramica Cleopatra presents clearly better form and seasonal performance, occupying 3rd place in the table with a record of 11 wins and just 4 losses, while Wadi Degla sits in 6th position with a more balanced 7-6-5 record. The visitors show better offensive efficiency on the road (13% shot conversion rate vs 9% for hosts at home) and impressive defense with 56% clean sheets away and an average of only 0.67 conceded goals. The visitors' positive away goal difference (+4) contrasts with the hosts' zero balance at their own stadium. Wadi Degla struggles with efficiency, failing to score in 33% of home matches, which could be crucial given Ceramica's solid defense. The last five meetings for both teams show an identical points record (1.4 PPG), but the quality of play and table position speak in favor of the guests, who have a real chance of taking three points in this clash.

Wadi Degla vs Ceramica Cleopatra: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Wadi Degla played Ceramica Cleopatra in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The match was played on 28 February 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Current form

Wadi Degla: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Ceramica Cleopatra: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Wadi Degla scores 1.22 and concedes 1.06 goals per match. Ceramica Cleopatra scores 1.44 and concedes 0.72. League average: 1.99 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Wadi Degla 67%, Ceramica Cleopatra 33%. Over 2.5: Wadi Degla 44%, Ceramica Cleopatra 28%. League level: BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 33%.

xG, shots and style

Wadi Degla has higher xG: 1.32 vs 1.27. Wadi Degla: 11.2 shots per match, Ceramica Cleopatra: 10.7.

Match halves

Wadi Degla: half-time lead 17%, second-half goals 0.83. Ceramica Cleopatra: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.89.

Goals by minute

Wadi Degla: 61-75 (7 goals). Ceramica Cleopatra: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Egyptian Premier League: 1.99 goals per match, BTTS 46%, Over 2.5 33%.

Head-to-head

No aligned head-to-head sample is available in the database.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Ceramica Cleopatra presents clearly better form and seasonal performance, occupying 3rd place in the table with a record of 11 wins and just 4 losses, while Wadi Degla sits in 6th position with a more balanced 7-6-5 record. The visitors show better offensive efficiency on the road (13% shot conversion rate vs 9% for hosts at home) and impressive defense with 56% clean sheets away and an average of only 0.67 conceded goals. The visitors' positive away goal difference (+4) contrasts with the hosts' zero balance at their own stadium. Wadi Degla struggles with efficiency, failing to score in 33% of home matches, which could be crucial given Ceramica's solid defense. The last five meetings for both teams show an identical points record (1.4 PPG), but the quality of play and table position speak in favor of the guests, who have a real chance of taking three points in this clash.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

42Possession (%)58
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra
8Shots8
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra
2Shots on target4
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra
0.95xG1.18
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra
4Corners6
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra
42Dangerous attacks53
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra
15Fouls16
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra
1Cards2
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra
1.22Goals scored / match1.44
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra
1.06Goals conceded / match0.72
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra
56%Average possession60%
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra
3.61Shots on target / match4
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.22Shots per match10.67
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra
3.61Shots on target4
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra
10.9%Shot conversion13.5%
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra
56%Possession60%
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra
1.32xG for1.27
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra
1.07xG against1.22
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra

Shooting quality

Wadi Degla: BalancedCeramica Cleopatra: Efficient finishing
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra
Accuracy (shots on target)32%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Wadi Degla
WLLDW
Season result split
39% W33% D28% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-6-5
1.50 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-3-3
Last 5 at home
1-2-2
DLDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.34Opponent xG: 1.29BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Ceramica Cleopatra
WLWLD
Season result split
61% W17% D22% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-3-4
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-2-3
Last 5 away
3-0-2
WWWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.61Opponent xG: 1.08BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Ceramica Cleopatra is 18% better for: goals scored per match.

1.22 goals / match - Wadi Degla · 1.44 goals / match - Ceramica Cleopatra

Ceramica Cleopatra is 47% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.06 goals / match - Wadi Degla · 0.72 goals / match - Ceramica Cleopatra

Wadi Degla scoring profile: mixed

Wadi Degla scores in 72% of matches (13 of 18 matches), while Ceramica Cleopatra keeps a clean sheet in 50% (9 of 18 matches).

Ceramica Cleopatra scoring profile: very strong

Ceramica Cleopatra scores in 78% of matches (14 of 18 matches), while Wadi Degla keeps a clean sheet in 17% (3 of 18 matches).

22Goals scored (season)26
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra
19Goals conceded (season)13
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra
2.28Average goals in match2.17
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra
7Goals scored (last 5)9
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra
8Goals conceded (last 5)8
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra

How often they score at least...

72%1 goal78%
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra
33%2 goals50%
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra
11%3 goals17%
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra
6%4 goals0%
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra

How often they concede at least...

83%1 goal50%
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra
17%2 goals17%
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra
6%3 goals6%
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra
0%4 goals0%
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

33%
Ceramica Cleopatra - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.6 of 18 matches
46%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time17%
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra
0%BTTS in both halves11%
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra
17%Scored in both halves28%
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra

BTTS and goal count

44%Min. 3 goals and BTTS22%
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra
80%BTTS - last 580%
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

61%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra
22%Min. 2 goals before half-time22%
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra
6%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time44%
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra
6%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ceramica Cleopatra is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Wadi Degla · 1.5 pts / match - Ceramica Cleopatra

Wadi Degla - half-time state
17% leading50% draw33% trailing
Ceramica Cleopatra - half-time state
33% leading50% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.5
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra
0.39Goals scored (1st half)0.56
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra
0.61Goals conceded (1st half)0.33
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra
1Average goals (1st half)0.89
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra
50%Clean sheet before half-time72%
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra
72%No goal before half-time61%
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra

After half-time (2nd half)

1.39Points per match (2nd half)1.83
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra
0.83Goals scored (2nd half)0.89
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra
0.44Goals conceded (2nd half)0.39
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra
1.28Average goals (2nd half)1.28
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra
56%Clean sheet after half-time67%
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra
39%No goal after half-time33%
Wadi DeglaCeramica Cleopatra

Wadi Degla - second-half results

22% W72% D6% L
18
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
+7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding229%

Leads at half-time in 17% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Ceramica Cleopatra - second-half results

50% W33% D17% L
27
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding185%

Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 61%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Wadi Degla - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.00
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match1.00.6
Average goals in match1.81.2
1 goal80%60%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-10
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 100% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Ceramica Cleopatra - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match2.001.00
Goals scored / match1.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match2.01.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals60%0%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+2-1
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 6

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Wadi Degla
ScoredConceded
1
3
0-15
4
3
16-30
2
5
31-45
2
3
46-60
7
4
61-75
6
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

Ceramica Cleopatra
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
3
3
16-30
5
3
31-45
4
2
46-60
5
1
61-75
7
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.22
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.0 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
112%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Wadi Degla

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.01
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
120%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Ceramica Cleopatra

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.67
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.50
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
148%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
71%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).

Teams vs league

Wadi DeglaLigaCeramica Cleopatra
Average goals in match 2.281.99 2.17
Both teams scored 67%46% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 44%33% 28%
Clean sheets 17%35% 50%
Goal before half-time 61%57% 50%
Goal after half-time 67%69% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.99
Average goals per match
46%
Both teams scored
33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
35%
Clean sheets
1.02
Home goals / match
0.97
Away goals / match
+5%
Home attack advantage
+5%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
19%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
35%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Ceramica CleopatraSubstitutionOn: Hussein Al SayedOff: Karim Moahmed
  2. Ceramica CleopatraYellow cardMohamed Reda
  3. Ceramica CleopatraGoalHussein Al Sayed
  4. Wadi DeglaSubstitutionOn: Ibrahim Mohamed El BahnasiOff: Mees Kaandorp
  5. Wadi DeglaSubstitutionOn: Ali HusseinOff: Ahmed Farouk
  6. Ceramica CleopatraYellow cardJustice Arthur
  7. Ceramica CleopatraGoalAyman SaadAssist: Fagrie Lakay
  8. Wadi DeglaYellow cardAmr Hossam

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Wadi Degla vs Ceramica Cleopatra?

The Egyptian Premier League match finished Wadi Degla 1:1 Ceramica Cleopatra. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Wadi Degla vs Ceramica Cleopatra?

Wadi Degla score 1.22 goals per game on average and Ceramica Cleopatra 1.44. The Egyptian Premier League average is 1.99 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 33% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Wadi Degla's matches and 33% of Ceramica Cleopatra's.

What form are Wadi Degla and Ceramica Cleopatra in?

Over the last 5 games Wadi Degla have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Ceramica Cleopatra 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Wadi Degla vs Ceramica Cleopatra?

The statistical background for Wadi Degla vs Ceramica Cleopatra — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.