Germany - 3. LigaData current as of 07 September 2026

Waldhof Mannheim vs Erzgebirge Aue: match statistics

165%(2.09)
X22%(3.40)
213%(3.10)

Waldhof Mannheim demonstrates significantly better home form with a 57% win rate and a positive goal difference of +4 at their home ground. The hosts score an average of 1.86 goals per match at home, while Erzgebirge Aue concedes an average of as many as 2 goals in away matches. The visitors are in disastrous form with five consecutive defeats and zero points in recent matches, with only a 7% away win rate this season. The difference in xG quality (1.62 vs 1.36) and the significantly better shot conversion rate of the hosts (14% vs 9%) further argue in favor of a Waldhof Mannheim victory. Aue's negative away goal difference (-14) against the solid defense of the hosts makes the home team's victory the most likely scenario.

Waldhof Mannheim vs Erzgebirge Aue: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Waldhof Mannheim played Erzgebirge Aue in 3. Liga (Germany). The match was played on 21 March 2026. Final score: 2:1.

Current form

Waldhof Mannheim: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Erzgebirge Aue: 0-0-5, 0.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Waldhof Mannheim scores 1.62 and concedes 1.83 goals per match. Erzgebirge Aue scores 1.14 and concedes 1.79. League average: 3.13 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Waldhof Mannheim 66%, Erzgebirge Aue 62%. Over 2.5: Waldhof Mannheim 72%, Erzgebirge Aue 66%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 63%.

xG, shots and style

Waldhof Mannheim has higher xG: 1.56 vs 1.50. Waldhof Mannheim: 12.9 shots per match, Erzgebirge Aue: 12.5.

Match halves

Waldhof Mannheim: half-time lead 34%, second-half goals 1.03. Erzgebirge Aue: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.62.

Goals by minute

Waldhof Mannheim: 46-60 (12 goals). Erzgebirge Aue: 31-45+ (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

3. Liga: 3.13 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 63%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Waldhof Mannheim demonstrates significantly better home form with a 57% win rate and a positive goal difference of +4 at their home ground. The hosts score an average of 1.86 goals per match at home, while Erzgebirge Aue concedes an average of as many as 2 goals in away matches. The visitors are in disastrous form with five consecutive defeats and zero points in recent matches, with only a 7% away win rate this season. The difference in xG quality (1.62 vs 1.36) and the significantly better shot conversion rate of the hosts (14% vs 9%) further argue in favor of a Waldhof Mannheim victory. Aue's negative away goal difference (-14) against the solid defense of the hosts makes the home team's victory the most likely scenario.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
2 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

54Possession (%)46
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue
17Shots11
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue
5Shots on target2
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue
1.81xG1.24
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue
4Corners5
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue
55Dangerous attacks56
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue
10Fouls12
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue
0Cards3
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue
1.62Goals scored / match1.14
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue
1.83Goals conceded / match1.79
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue
47%Average possession50%
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue
4.86Shots on target / match4.31
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.86Shots per match12.48
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue
4.86Shots on target4.31
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue
12.6%Shot conversion9.1%
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue
47%Possession50%
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue
1.56xG for1.5
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue
1.61xG against1.71
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue

Shooting quality

Waldhof Mannheim: Counter-attackingErzgebirge Aue: Balanced
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue
Accuracy (shots on target)38%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Waldhof Mannheim
LWLWL
Season result split
45% W10% R45% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-3-13
1.45 pts / match · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
8-2-4
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
DLWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.61Opponent xG: 1.76BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Erzgebirge Aue
LLLLL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
17% W31% R52% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-9-15
0.83 pts / match · goal difference -19
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-0-5
0.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
1-4-9
Last 5 away
0-1-4
LLDLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.8xG: 1.57Opponent xG: 1.56BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Waldhof Mannheim is 42% better for: goals scored per match.

1.62 goals / match - Waldhof Mannheim · 1.14 goals / match - Erzgebirge Aue

Waldhof Mannheim scoring profile: very strong

Waldhof Mannheim scores in 76% of matches (22 of 29 matches), while Erzgebirge Aue keeps a clean sheet in 24% (7 of 29 matches).

Erzgebirge Aue scoring profile: very strong

Erzgebirge Aue scores in 72% of matches (21 of 29 matches), while Waldhof Mannheim keeps a clean sheet in 10% (3 of 29 matches).

47Goals scored (season)33
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue
53Goals conceded (season)52
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue
3.45Average goals in match2.93
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue
7Goals scored (last 5)6
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue
10Goals conceded (last 5)14
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue

How often they score at least...

76%1 goal72%
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue
55%2 goals28%
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue
21%3 goals7%
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue
3%4 goals7%
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue

How often they concede at least...

90%1 goal76%
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue
48%2 goals62%
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue
28%3 goals34%
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue
14%4 goals7%
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

66%
Waldhof Mannheim - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.19 of 29 matches
64%
League average

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time28%
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue
3%BTTS in both halves7%
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue
24%Scored in both halves14%
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue

BTTS and goal count

62%Min. 3 goals and BTTS55%
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue
80%BTTS - last 5100%
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

83%Min. 1 goal before half-time79%
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time41%
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time79%
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue
59%Min. 2 goals after half-time45%
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue
34%Min. 3 goals after half-time28%
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Waldhof Mannheim is 24% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.28 pts / match - Waldhof Mannheim · 1.03 pts / match - Erzgebirge Aue

Waldhof Mannheim - half-time state
34% leading24% draw41% trailing
Erzgebirge Aue - half-time state
21% leading41% draw38% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.28Points per match (1st half)1.03
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue
0.59Goals scored (1st half)0.52
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue
0.76Goals conceded (1st half)0.79
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue
1.34Average goals (1st half)1.31
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue
45%Clean sheet before half-time38%
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue
59%No goal before half-time55%
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue

After half-time (2nd half)

1.38Points per match (2nd half)1.1
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue
1.03Goals scored (2nd half)0.62
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue
1.07Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue
2.1Average goals (2nd half)1.62
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue
34%Clean sheet after half-time38%
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue
41%No goal after half-time59%
Waldhof MannheimErzgebirge Aue

Waldhof Mannheim - second-half results

34% W34% R31% P
37
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
40
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.28
PPG before half-time
Lead holding132%

Leads at half-time in 34% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Erzgebirge Aue - second-half results

28% W28% R45% P
30
Half-time points
15
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
32
Second-half points
-11
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.03
PPG before half-time
Lead holding81%

Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 17%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Waldhof Mannheim - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.202.00
Goals scored / match0.01.4
Goals conceded / match1.20.8
Average goals in match1.22.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal100%20%
Goal difference-6+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Erzgebirge Aue - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.600.40
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match1.61.2
Average goals in match2.41.6
1 goal100%100%
2 goals100%60%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet0%0%
No goal20%60%
Goal difference-4-4
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 80% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Waldhof Mannheim
ScoredConceded
7
8
0-15
4
6
16-30
6
8
31-45
12
10
46-60
8
10
61-75
10
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Erzgebirge Aue
ScoredConceded
3
5
0-15
4
8
16-30
8
10
31-45
5
7
46-60
5
8
61-75
8
14
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.19
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.7 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
102%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
64%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-37%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
55%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Waldhof Mannheim

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.16
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.06
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
95%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
128%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Erzgebirge Aue

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.44
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.36
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
80%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
105%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.83
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 9% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3. Liga).

Teams vs league

Waldhof MannheimLigaErzgebirge Aue
Average goals in match 3.453.13 2.93
Both teams scored 66%64% 62%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 72%63% 66%
Clean sheets 10%22% 24%
Goal before half-time 83%76% 79%
Goal after half-time 86%83% 79%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.13
Average goals per match
64%
Both teams scored
63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.70
Home goals / match
1.43
Away goals / match
+19%
Home attack advantage
+16%
Home defence advantage
+14%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
83%
1 goal
54%
2 goals
27%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Erzgebirge AueGoalMarvin Stefaniak
  2. Waldhof MannheimSubstitutionOn: Lovis Frederik BierschenkOff: Kushtrim Asallari
  3. Waldhof MannheimGoalLovis Frederik BierschenkAssist: Diego Michel
  4. Waldhof MannheimSubstitutionOn: Julian RieckmannOff: Vincent Thill
  5. Erzgebirge AueYellow cardJannic Ehlers
  6. Erzgebirge AueYellow cardLuan Simnica
  7. Erzgebirge AueSubstitutionOn: Julian GuttauOff: Julian Günther Schmidt
  8. Erzgebirge AueSubstitutionOn: Vincent OcanseyOff: Marcel Bär
  9. Waldhof MannheimGoalTerrence BoydAssist: Niklas Hoffmann
  10. Erzgebirge AueYellow cardMartin Männel
  11. Erzgebirge AueSubstitutionOn: Ricky BornscheinOff: Eric Uhlmann
  12. Waldhof MannheimSubstitutionOn: Maximilian ThalhammerOff: Diego Michel

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Referee context

See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.

Timon Oliver SchulzMatches officiated: 11
5.73Cards per match
0Penalties per match
1 / X / 291%Home wins9%Draws0%Away wins

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Waldhof Mannheim 1 - 0 - 0 Erzgebirge Aue. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FC Erzgebirge Aue
0 : 2
SV Waldhof Mannheim 07

FAQ

What was the result of Waldhof Mannheim vs Erzgebirge Aue?

The 3. Liga match finished Waldhof Mannheim 2:1 Erzgebirge Aue. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Waldhof Mannheim vs Erzgebirge Aue?

Waldhof Mannheim score 1.62 goals per game on average and Erzgebirge Aue 1.14. The 3. Liga average is 3.13 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 66% of Waldhof Mannheim's matches and 62% of Erzgebirge Aue's.

What form are Waldhof Mannheim and Erzgebirge Aue in?

Over the last 5 games Waldhof Mannheim have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Erzgebirge Aue 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Waldhof Mannheim vs Erzgebirge Aue?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.