Germany - 3. LigaData current as of 12 September 2026

Waldhof Mannheim vs Hansa Rostock: match statistics

125%(2.75)
X30%(3.50)
245%(2.20)

Hansa Rostock displays significantly better form and disposition this season. The visitors occupy 4th place in the table with an impressive record of 9 wins and just 3 losses, while Waldhof Mannheim sits in 11th position with a balance of 9 wins and 9 defeats. A key factor is current form – Hansa has not lost in their last 5 matches (3 wins, 2 draws) and scored 9 goals while conceding only 4. Waldhof Mannheim, on the other hand, has lost 3 of their last 5 meetings, scoring just 6 goals and conceding as many as 12. Hansa's away statistics are impressive: 44% won matches on the road, 56% clean sheets, and a positive goal difference (+8), which contrasts with the hosts' unstable play at home. The advantage in ball possession (54% vs 47%) and better defensive efficiency (0.89 vs 1.5 average goals conceded) further speak in favor of the visitors.

Waldhof Mannheim vs Hansa Rostock: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Waldhof Mannheim played Hansa Rostock in 3. Liga (Germany). The match was played on 25 January 2026. Final score: 0:4.

Current form

Waldhof Mannheim: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Hansa Rostock: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Waldhof Mannheim scores 1.70 and concedes 1.80 goals per match. Hansa Rostock scores 1.65 and concedes 1.00. League average: 3.15 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Waldhof Mannheim 60%, Hansa Rostock 50%. Over 2.5: Waldhof Mannheim 70%, Hansa Rostock 55%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 63%.

xG, shots and style

Hansa Rostock has higher xG: 1.91 vs 1.61. Waldhof Mannheim: 12.8 shots per match, Hansa Rostock: 16.2.

Match halves

Waldhof Mannheim: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 1.00. Hansa Rostock: half-time lead 25%, second-half goals 0.85.

Goals by minute

Waldhof Mannheim: 46-60 (9 goals). Hansa Rostock: 76-90+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

3. Liga: 3.15 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 63%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Hansa Rostock displays significantly better form and disposition this season. The visitors occupy 4th place in the table with an impressive record of 9 wins and just 3 losses, while Waldhof Mannheim sits in 11th position with a balance of 9 wins and 9 defeats. A key factor is current form – Hansa has not lost in their last 5 matches (3 wins, 2 draws) and scored 9 goals while conceding only 4. Waldhof Mannheim, on the other hand, has lost 3 of their last 5 meetings, scoring just 6 goals and conceding as many as 12. Hansa's away statistics are impressive: 44% won matches on the road, 56% clean sheets, and a positive goal difference (+8), which contrasts with the hosts' unstable play at home. The advantage in ball possession (54% vs 47%) and better defensive efficiency (0.89 vs 1.5 average goals conceded) further speak in favor of the visitors.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
0 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

41Possession (%)59
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock
7Shots14
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock
4Shots on target4
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock
0.98xG1.56
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock
3Corners4
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock
36Dangerous attacks55
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock
17Fouls14
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock
3Cards1
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock
1.7Goals scored / match1.65
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock
1.8Goals conceded / match1
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock
48%Average possession55%
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock
5.3Shots on target / match5.65
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.85Shots per match16.2
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock
5.3Shots on target5.65
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock
13.2%Shot conversion10.2%
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock
48%Possession55%
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock
1.61xG for1.91
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock
1.59xG against1.3
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock

Shooting quality

Waldhof Mannheim: Efficient finishingHansa Rostock: Dominant
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock
Accuracy (shots on target)41%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.320.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Hansa Rostock is 57% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Waldhof Mannheim · 2.2 pts / match - Hansa Rostock

Waldhof Mannheim
WWLDL
Season result split
45% W10% D45% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-2-9
1.45 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
5-2-3
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
LWWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.57Opponent xG: 1.53BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 100%
Hansa Rostock
WDWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
45% W40% D15% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-8-3
1.75 pts / match · goal difference +13
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
4-4-1
Last 5 away
4-1-0
DWWWW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.77Opponent xG: 1.28BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Hansa Rostock is 80% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.8 goals / match - Waldhof Mannheim · 1 goals / match - Hansa Rostock

Waldhof Mannheim scoring profile: strong

Waldhof Mannheim scores in 75% of matches (15 of 20 matches), while Hansa Rostock keeps a clean sheet in 40% (8 of 20 matches).

Hansa Rostock scoring profile: very strong

Hansa Rostock scores in 80% of matches (16 of 20 matches), while Waldhof Mannheim keeps a clean sheet in 15% (3 of 20 matches).

34Goals scored (season)33
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock
36Goals conceded (season)20
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock
3.5Average goals in match2.65
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock
9Goals scored (last 5)9
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock
13Goals conceded (last 5)4
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock

How often they score at least...

75%1 goal80%
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock
60%2 goals50%
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock
20%3 goals20%
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock
5%4 goals10%
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock

How often they concede at least...

85%1 goal60%
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock
55%2 goals30%
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock
25%3 goals10%
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock
10%4 goals0%
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

60%
Waldhof Mannheim - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.12 of 20 matches
63%
League average

Goal patterns

20%BTTS at half-time35%
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock
5%BTTS in both halves20%
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock
30%Scored in both halves40%
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock

BTTS and goal count

60%Min. 3 goals and BTTS35%
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock
80%BTTS - last 560%
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time70%
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock
40%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock
60%Min. 2 goals after half-time45%
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock
35%Min. 3 goals after half-time5%
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Waldhof Mannheim is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.5 pts / match - Waldhof Mannheim · 1.35 pts / match - Hansa Rostock

Waldhof Mannheim - half-time state
40% leading30% draw30% trailing
Hansa Rostock - half-time state
25% leading60% draw15% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.5Points per match (1st half)1.35
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock
0.7Goals scored (1st half)0.8
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock
0.65Goals conceded (1st half)0.6
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock
1.35Average goals (1st half)1.4
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock
50%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock
50%No goal before half-time45%
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock

After half-time (2nd half)

1.2Points per match (2nd half)1.8
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.85
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock
1.15Goals conceded (2nd half)0.4
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock
2.15Average goals (2nd half)1.25
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock
30%Clean sheet after half-time65%
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock
45%No goal after half-time35%
Waldhof MannheimHansa Rostock

Waldhof Mannheim - second-half results

25% W45% D30% L
30
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
-3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.50
PPG before half-time
Lead holding113%

Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Hansa Rostock - second-half results

45% W45% D10% L
27
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
+9
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.35
PPG before half-time
Lead holding180%

Leads at half-time in 25% of matches and wins 45%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Waldhof Mannheim - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.20
Goals scored / match0.61.2
Goals conceded / match1.21.4
Average goals in match1.82.6
1 goal100%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals40%60%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-3-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Hansa Rostock - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.402.20
Goals scored / match0.81.0
Goals conceded / match0.60.2
Average goals in match1.41.2
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet40%80%
No goal20%20%
Goal difference+1+4
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Waldhof Mannheim
ScoredConceded
6
4
0-15
4
5
16-30
4
4
31-45
9
7
46-60
4
7
61-75
7
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Hansa Rostock
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
4
3
16-30
8
5
31-45
6
1
46-60
2
2
61-75
9
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.08
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
98%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
55%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-67%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
60%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
5%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 20 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Waldhof Mannheim

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.02
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.09
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
122%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.05
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

Hansa Rostock

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.61
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.26
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.30
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
112%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
60%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.45
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3. Liga).

Teams vs league

Waldhof MannheimLigaHansa Rostock
Average goals in match 3.503.15 2.65
Both teams scored 60%63% 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 70%63% 55%
Clean sheets 15%22% 40%
Goal before half-time 80%75% 70%
Goal after half-time 85%84% 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.15
Average goals per match
63%
Both teams scored
63%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
22%
Clean sheets
1.68
Home goals / match
1.47
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+12%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
56%
2 goals
29%
3 goals
12%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Hansa RostockGoalJonas Michel DirknerAssist: Ryan Don Naderi
  2. Waldhof MannheimYellow cardEmmanuel Iwe
  3. Waldhof MannheimYellow cardVincent Thill
  4. Waldhof MannheimYellow cardEmmanuel Iwe
  5. Hansa RostockYellow cardJan Mejdr
  6. Hansa RostockGoalAndreas VoglsammerAssist: Ryan Don Naderi
  7. Hansa RostockSubstitutionOn: Nico NeidhartOff: Jan Mejdr
  8. Waldhof MannheimSubstitutionOn: Kushtrim AsallariOff: Vincent Thill
  9. Hansa RostockGoalEmil HoltenAssist: Ryan Don Naderi
  10. Hansa RostockSubstitutionOn: Franz PfanneOff: Florian-Horst Carstens
  11. Hansa RostockSubstitutionOn: Christian KinsombiOff: Ryan Don Naderi
  12. Waldhof MannheimSubstitutionOn: Denis KryeziuOff: Tim Sechelmann
  13. Hansa RostockGoalChristian KinsombiAssist: Cedric Harenbrock

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Waldhof Mannheim 0 - 0 - 1 Hansa Rostock. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FC Hansa Rostock
1 : 0
SV Waldhof Mannheim 07

FAQ

What was the result of Waldhof Mannheim vs Hansa Rostock?

The 3. Liga match finished Waldhof Mannheim 0:4 Hansa Rostock. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Waldhof Mannheim vs Hansa Rostock?

Waldhof Mannheim score 1.70 goals per game on average and Hansa Rostock 1.65. The 3. Liga average is 3.15 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Waldhof Mannheim's matches and 50% of Hansa Rostock's.

What form are Waldhof Mannheim and Hansa Rostock in?

Over the last 5 games Waldhof Mannheim have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Hansa Rostock 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Waldhof Mannheim vs Hansa Rostock?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Waldhof Mannheim vs Hansa Rostock: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.