England - EFL League TwoData current as of 11 September 2026

Walsall vs Barnet: match statistics

Walsall crest
Walsall
1 : 3half-time 0:1
Barnet crest
Barnet
135%(3.25)
X35%(3.40)
230%(2.15)

Statistical analysis indicates very evenly matched chances for both teams, which points to a draw. Walsall has the home advantage with a 50% win rate in home matches, but recent form is concerning – only 1 win in the last 5 games and 1.2 points per match. Barnet shows better form with 1.6 points per match in the last 5 games and an impressive 50% clean sheets away. The visitors dominate in possession (54% vs 41%) and have a higher average xG (1.55 vs 1.39), indicating their offensive potential. Barnet's high draw percentage away (43%) and both teams' solid defense suggest the match could end in a share of the points. Taking all factors into account, a draw appears to be the most likely outcome of this encounter.

Walsall vs Barnet: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Walsall played Barnet in EFL League Two (England). The match was played on 7 February 2026. Final score: 1:3.

Current form

Walsall: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match. Barnet: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.

Goal statistics

Walsall scores 1.28 and concedes 0.97 goals per match. Barnet scores 1.28 and concedes 1.03. League average: 2.59 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Walsall 48%, Barnet 48%. Over 2.5: Walsall 38%, Barnet 38%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 48%.

xG, shots and style

Barnet has higher xG: 1.71 vs 1.29. Walsall: 10.8 shots per match, Barnet: 14.6.

Match halves

Walsall: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.66. Barnet: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 0.62.

Goals by minute

Walsall: 31-45+ (9 goals). Barnet: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

League Two: 2.59 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 48%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Statistical analysis indicates very evenly matched chances for both teams, which points to a draw. Walsall has the home advantage with a 50% win rate in home matches, but recent form is concerning – only 1 win in the last 5 games and 1.2 points per match. Barnet shows better form with 1.6 points per match in the last 5 games and an impressive 50% clean sheets away. The visitors dominate in possession (54% vs 41%) and have a higher average xG (1.55 vs 1.39), indicating their offensive potential. Barnet's high draw percentage away (43%) and both teams' solid defense suggest the match could end in a share of the points. Taking all factors into account, a draw appears to be the most likely outcome of this encounter.

View the statistical overview

Half-by-half

0 : 1
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

24Possession (%)76
WalsallBarnet
8Shots16
WalsallBarnet
3Shots on target10
WalsallBarnet
0.98xG2.15
WalsallBarnet
1Corners9
WalsallBarnet
36Dangerous attacks62
WalsallBarnet
17Fouls10
WalsallBarnet
5Cards1
WalsallBarnet

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.28Goals scored / match1.28
WalsallBarnet
0.97Goals conceded / match1.03
WalsallBarnet
39%Average possession56%
WalsallBarnet
3.86Shots on target / match4.86
WalsallBarnet

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.79Shots per match14.55
WalsallBarnet
3.86Shots on target4.86
WalsallBarnet
11.8%Shot conversion8.8%
WalsallBarnet
39%Possession56%
WalsallBarnet
1.29xG for1.71
WalsallBarnet
1.33xG against1.12
WalsallBarnet

Shooting quality

Walsall: BalancedBarnet: Dominant
WalsallBarnet
Accuracy (shots on target)36%33%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.330.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Barnet is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Walsall · 1.6 pts / match - Barnet

Walsall
WDDDL
Season result split
48% W24% D28% L
Season (W-D-L)
14-7-8
1.69 pts / match · goal difference +9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
7-3-4
Last 5 at home
1-3-1
DWLDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.17Opponent xG: 1.54BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%
Barnet
LWWDD
Season result split
38% W34% D28% L
Season (W-D-L)
11-10-8
1.48 pts / match · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-6-3
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LDWLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 1.65Opponent xG: 1.14BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Walsall is 6% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.97 goals / match - Walsall · 1.03 goals / match - Barnet

Walsall scoring profile: strong

Walsall scores in 69% of matches (20 of 29 matches), while Barnet keeps a clean sheet in 38% (11 of 29 matches).

Barnet scoring profile: very strong

Barnet scores in 76% of matches (22 of 29 matches), while Walsall keeps a clean sheet in 31% (9 of 29 matches).

37Goals scored (season)37
WalsallBarnet
28Goals conceded (season)30
WalsallBarnet
2.24Average goals in match2.31
WalsallBarnet
5Goals scored (last 5)5
WalsallBarnet
5Goals conceded (last 5)4
WalsallBarnet

How often they score at least...

69%1 goal76%
WalsallBarnet
34%2 goals38%
WalsallBarnet
17%3 goals10%
WalsallBarnet
7%4 goals3%
WalsallBarnet

How often they concede at least...

69%1 goal62%
WalsallBarnet
28%2 goals31%
WalsallBarnet
0%3 goals10%
WalsallBarnet
0%4 goals0%
WalsallBarnet

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time28%
WalsallBarnet
3%BTTS in both halves3%
WalsallBarnet
21%Scored in both halves21%
WalsallBarnet

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS31%
WalsallBarnet
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
WalsallBarnet
40%BTTS - last 540%
WalsallBarnet

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

69%Min. 1 goal before half-time69%
WalsallBarnet
24%Min. 2 goals before half-time38%
WalsallBarnet
14%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
WalsallBarnet

2nd half

66%Min. 1 goal after half-time72%
WalsallBarnet
31%Min. 2 goals after half-time24%
WalsallBarnet
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time7%
WalsallBarnet

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Walsall is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.48 pts / match - Walsall · 1.34 pts / match - Barnet

Walsall - half-time state
38% leading34% draw28% trailing
Barnet - half-time state
31% leading41% draw28% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.48Points per match (1st half)1.34
WalsallBarnet
0.62Goals scored (1st half)0.66
WalsallBarnet
0.52Goals conceded (1st half)0.62
WalsallBarnet
1.14Average goals (1st half)1.28
WalsallBarnet
59%Clean sheet before half-time55%
WalsallBarnet
55%No goal before half-time48%
WalsallBarnet

After half-time (2nd half)

1.41Points per match (2nd half)1.48
WalsallBarnet
0.66Goals scored (2nd half)0.62
WalsallBarnet
0.45Goals conceded (2nd half)0.41
WalsallBarnet
1.1Average goals (2nd half)1.03
WalsallBarnet
59%Clean sheet after half-time59%
WalsallBarnet
55%No goal after half-time55%
WalsallBarnet

Walsall - second-half results

31% W48% D21% L
43
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
41
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.48
PPG before half-time
Lead holding126%

Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Barnet - second-half results

38% W34% D28% L
39
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
43
Second-half points
+6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.34
PPG before half-time
Lead holding123%

Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Walsall - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.20
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.6
Average goals in match1.01.0
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3
Barnet - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.20
Goals scored / match0.60.4
Goals conceded / match0.40.4
Average goals in match1.00.8
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+10
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Walsall
ScoredConceded
4
2
0-15
5
6
16-30
9
7
31-45
5
2
46-60
7
5
61-75
7
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Barnet
ScoredConceded
6
6
0-15
6
3
16-30
7
9
31-45
3
4
46-60
3
4
61-75
12
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.28
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.2 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
88%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
48%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+32%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
52%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Walsall

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.04
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-6.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.36
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
93%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
80%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.49
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
19% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
19%

Barnet

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.59
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.34
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.43
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
106%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
75%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.0
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 16% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League Two).

Teams vs league

WalsallLigaBarnet
Average goals in match 2.242.59 2.31
Both teams scored 48%53% 48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 38%48% 38%
Clean sheets 31%26% 38%
Goal before half-time 69%69% 69%
Goal after half-time 66%77% 72%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.59
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.38
Home goals / match
1.21
Away goals / match
+14%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. WalsallYellow cardAaron Presley
  2. BarnetGoalAdam SeniorAssist: Kane Smith
  3. BarnetYellow cardKane Smith
  4. WalsallYellow cardMason Hancock
  5. WalsallGoalDaniel Kanu
  6. WalsallYellow cardBrandon Comley
  7. WalsallYellow cardCourtney Clarke
  8. BarnetSubstitutionOn: Diallang JaiyesimiOff: Ryan Glover
  9. WalsallSubstitutionOn: Albert Danquah AdomahOff: Mason Hancock
  10. BarnetSubstitutionOn: Phillip ChineduOff: Kane Smith
  11. BarnetSubstitutionOn: Stephen Rhys BrowneOff: Mark Shelton
  12. WalsallYellow cardPriestley Farquharson

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Walsall 1 - 0 - 0 Barnet. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

Barnet FC
1 : 2
Walsall FC

FAQ

What was the result of Walsall vs Barnet?

The EFL League Two match finished Walsall 1:3 Barnet. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Walsall vs Barnet?

Walsall score 1.28 goals per game on average and Barnet 1.28. The EFL League Two average is 2.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Walsall's matches and 48% of Barnet's.

What form are Walsall and Barnet in?

Over the last 5 games Walsall have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Barnet 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Walsall vs Barnet?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.