Warta Sieradz vs Olimpia Elbląg: match statistics
Warta Sieradz displays impressive home form with an 82% win rate at their own stadium and a +13 goal difference. In 11 home matches, the hosts have scored an average of 2.09 goals while conceding only 0.91 per match, indicating a solid defense. Olimpia Elbląg has poor away results - only a 30% win rate, conceding an average of 2 goals per match, and a negative goal difference of -6. The quality gap is also evident in xG statistics, where Warta holds an advantage in both attack and defense. The recent form of both teams (1.6 vs 1.8 PPG) is similar; however, Warta's home advantage and Olimpia's weakness in away matches point to a certain victory for the hosts.
Warta Sieradz vs Olimpia Elbląg: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Warta Sieradz played Olimpia Elbląg in 3 Liga Group 1 (Poland). The match was played on 25 March 2026. Final score: 4:1.
Current form
Warta Sieradz: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Olimpia Elbląg: 3-0-2, 1.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Warta Sieradz scores 1.82 and concedes 0.91 goals per match. Olimpia Elbląg scores 1.55 and concedes 1.73. League average: 3.40 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Warta Sieradz 64%, Olimpia Elbląg 68%. Over 2.5: Warta Sieradz 64%, Olimpia Elbląg 55%. League level: BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 67%.
xG, shots and style
Warta Sieradz has higher xG: 1.44 vs 1.36. Warta Sieradz: 10.1 shots per match, Olimpia Elbląg: 8.1.
Match halves
Warta Sieradz: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 1.27. Olimpia Elbląg: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.68.
Goals by minute
Warta Sieradz: 76-90+ (13 goals). Olimpia Elbląg: 0-15 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
3 Liga Group 1: 3.40 goals per match, BTTS 63%, Over 2.5 67%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Warta Sieradz displays impressive home form with an 82% win rate at their own stadium and a +13 goal difference. In 11 home matches, the hosts have scored an average of 2.09 goals while conceding only 0.91 per match, indicating a solid defense. Olimpia Elbląg has poor away results - only a 30% win rate, conceding an average of 2 goals per match, and a negative goal difference of -6. The quality gap is also evident in xG statistics, where Warta holds an advantage in both attack and defense. The recent form of both teams (1.6 vs 1.8 PPG) is similar; however, Warta's home advantage and Olimpia's weakness in away matches point to a certain victory for the hosts.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal data strongly supports BTTS: Warta has a 67% BTTS rate, Olimpia 70%, with low clean sheet percentages (17% and 20%) and rare 'FTS' (17% and 10%). Warta should score because Olimpia concedes an average of 2.0 goals per match (xGA 1.82) and has poor defensive performance over the season. On the other hand, Olimpia has decent offensive productivity (1.4 goals/match, xG 1.14) and high shot conversion (20%), while Warta allows chances at a rate of 1.5 goals conceded and xGA 1.28. In the last 5 matches, Warta had a 100% BTTS rate, reinforcing the thesis of 'open' encounters, although Olimpia's form in this period (40% BTTS, 1.0 goal conceded) slightly increases the risk. Overall, given the high league average goals (3.4) and the advantage of the home pitch, the scenario with both teams scoring is more likely.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The goalscoring model indicates approximately 3.02 goals in the match, as Warta combines solid offensive potential (1.67 goals and 1.48 xG) with Olimpia's very vulnerable defense (2.0 goals conceded and 1.82 xGA). Olimpia should also contribute, as they average 1.4 goals scored (1.14 xG), while Warta concedes 1.5 goals per match with a low clean sheet percentage (17%). High BTTS rates (67% for Warta, 70% for Olimpia) and very frequent matches with min. 2 goals (Over 1.5: 83% and 90%) support a scenario with at least two goals. Shot data also favors goals (Warta: 12.18 shots and 4.45 on target; Olimpia is weaker in creation but an effective 20% conversion rate boosts their chances of scoring). Therefore, the strongest pick is Over 1.5, while the 2.5 and 3.5 lines are more balanced relative to risk.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Warta has clearly better attacking quality data (xG 1.48 vs 1.14; shots 12.18 and 4.45 on target vs 8.17 and 3.0), while Olimpia concedes many chances (xGA 1.82) and loses on average 2.0 goals per match. A draw is more likely in the first half, as Warta often draws at the break (50% in the season, 80% in the last 5), and both teams have similar HT goal averages (1.58 vs 1.6). The key signal is after the break: Olimpia has a weak second phase of the match (60% losses in the second half, second-half goal difference -8) and concedes particularly many goals in minutes 46–60 (8 goals). Warta, on the other hand, scores 0.83 goals per match in the second half, while Olimpia concedes as many as 1.3 goals per match in the second half, which favors a turnaround after the break. High BTTS (67% and 70%) and low overall CS indicate a match with goals, but with a greater chance that the decisive goal will be scored after the break in favor of the hosts.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Warta Sieradz | Olimpia Elbląg | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.17 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.45 | 0.55 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Olimpia Elbląg is 13% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Warta Sieradz · 1.8 pts / match - Olimpia Elbląg
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Warta Sieradz is 17% better for: goals scored per match.
1.82 goals / match - Warta Sieradz · 1.55 goals / match - Olimpia Elbląg
Warta Sieradz is 90% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.91 goals / match - Warta Sieradz · 1.73 goals / match - Olimpia Elbląg
Warta Sieradz scores in 95% of matches (21 of 22 matches), while Olimpia Elbląg keeps a clean sheet in 18% (4 of 22 matches).
Olimpia Elbląg scores in 86% of matches (19 of 22 matches), while Warta Sieradz keeps a clean sheet in 36% (8 of 22 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Warta Sieradz
Over / Under - Olimpia Elbląg
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Warta Sieradz - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 68%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Olimpia Elbląg - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 36%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Warta Sieradz
Olimpia Elbląg
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3 Liga Group 1).
Teams vs league
| Warta Sieradz | Liga | Olimpia Elbląg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.73 | 3.40 | ▼ 3.27 |
| Both teams scored | • 64% | 63% | ▲ 68% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 64% | 67% | ▼ 55% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 36% | 20% | ▼ 18% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 59% | 76% | ▲ 82% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 91% | 86% | ▼ 82% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Warta SieradzGoalPiotr Mielczarek
- Olimpia ElblągGoalDawid Wierzba
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Warta Sieradz 1 - 0 - 0 Olimpia Elbląg. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Warta Sieradz vs Olimpia Elbląg?
The 3 Liga Group 1 match finished Warta Sieradz 4:1 Olimpia Elbląg. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Warta Sieradz vs Olimpia Elbląg?
Warta Sieradz score 1.82 goals per game on average and Olimpia Elbląg 1.55. The 3 Liga Group 1 average is 3.40 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Warta Sieradz's matches and 68% of Olimpia Elbląg's.
What form are Warta Sieradz and Olimpia Elbląg in?
Over the last 5 games Warta Sieradz have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Olimpia Elbląg 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Warta Sieradz vs Olimpia Elbląg?
The statistical background for Warta Sieradz vs Olimpia Elbląg — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


