Warta Sieradz vs Swit: match statistics
Warta Sieradz vs Swit: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Warta Sieradz played Swit in 3 Liga Group 1 (Poland). The match was played on 29 March 2026. Final score: 3:1.
Current form
Warta Sieradz: 3-1-1, 2.00 points/match. Swit: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Warta Sieradz scores 1.91 and concedes 0.91 goals per match. Swit scores 1.48 and concedes 1.74. League average: 3.42 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Warta Sieradz 65%, Swit 57%. Over 2.5: Warta Sieradz 65%, Swit 65%. League level: BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 68%.
xG, shots and style
Warta Sieradz has higher xG: 1.45 vs 1.20. Warta Sieradz: 10.1 shots per match, Swit: 6.2.
Match halves
Warta Sieradz: half-time lead 26%, second-half goals 1.26. Swit: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.83.
Goals by minute
Warta Sieradz: 76-90+ (14 goals). Swit: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
3 Liga Group 1: 3.42 goals per match, BTTS 64%, Over 2.5 68%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Warta Sieradz are clear favorites: 2nd place and at home have 83% wins, 2.25 goals per match and 0% matches without scoring. Swit sit 8th, with only 27% wins away, 1.18 goals per away match and 2.45 goals conceded on the road. In the last five matches the hosts show better form (wwdlw) than the visitors (llwld), and xG and SoT differentials favor the hosts. Given Warta’s offensive stability and Swit’s away defensive vulnerability, the result leans toward a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Data signal a moderately-high probability of BTTS: league BTTS 64%, Warta season 58% and Świt 55%. Warta at home have 100% BTTS in last5 with avg scoring 2.2 and conceding 1.4 over those matches, boosting the chance both teams score. Świt have weaker recent scoring (0.6 GŚ last5) but concede heavily across the season (40 GA), which also supports the visitors conceding and hosts scoring. High league over2.5 further supports goal exchanges. Given Warta's home form and Świt's defensive vulnerability, recommendation is BTTS: Yes.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
xG and goal-balance analysis points to elevated scoring: home ~1.45 xG, away ~1.31 xG, total ~2.76 xG. Warta Sieradz shows better efficiency and the away defense has conceded 40 goals, increasing Swit’s risk. Both teams have high BTTS rates (58% and 55%) and the league averages 3.41 goals per match, favoring overs. Last5 form confirms hosts’ offensive potential (11 goals in 5) and higher over 2.5 rates for Warta. Based on this, the strongest signal is Over 1.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Based on the provided stats Warta Sieradz shows higher quality (PPG 1.67 vs 1.00, better xG and higher shot efficiency), giving them an edge. HT data indicate the hosts often draw at half-time (drawingAtHT_home 67%, scoredAVGHT_home 1.00 vs away 0.27), while Swit rarely leads at HT (last5_leadingAtHT_overall_away 0%, trailingAtHTPercentage_away 73%). The second half favors Warta — better points and second-half form (ppg_2hg_home 1.75, positive gd_2hg_home), suggesting a turnaround from a HT draw to a home win. Combining the high HT draw rate at home with their strong second-half profile, the most likely and strongest signal is HT/FT draw/home win (X/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Warta Sieradz | Swit | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.19 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.46 | 0.64 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Warta Sieradz is 150% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / match - Warta Sieradz · 0.8 pts / match - Swit
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Warta Sieradz is 29% better for: goals scored per match.
1.91 goals / match - Warta Sieradz · 1.48 goals / match - Swit
Warta Sieradz is 91% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.91 goals / match - Warta Sieradz · 1.74 goals / match - Swit
Warta Sieradz scores in 96% of matches (22 of 23 matches), while Swit keeps a clean sheet in 22% (5 of 23 matches).
Swit scores in 78% of matches (18 of 23 matches), while Warta Sieradz keeps a clean sheet in 35% (8 of 23 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Warta Sieradz
Over / Under - Swit
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Warta Sieradz is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.43 pts / match - Warta Sieradz · 1.04 pts / match - Swit
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Warta Sieradz - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 26% of matches and wins 70%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Swit - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 0% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Warta Sieradz
Swit
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3 Liga Group 1).
Teams vs league
| Warta Sieradz | Liga | Swit | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.83 | 3.42 | ▼ 3.22 |
| Both teams scored | • 65% | 64% | ▼ 57% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 65% | 68% | ▼ 65% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 35% | 20% | ▲ 22% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 61% | 75% | ▲ 83% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 91% | 87% | • 87% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Warta SieradzGoalBartłomiej Kręcichwost
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Warta Sieradz 1 - 0 - 0 Swit. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Warta Sieradz vs Swit?
The 3 Liga Group 1 match finished Warta Sieradz 3:1 Swit. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Warta Sieradz vs Swit?
Warta Sieradz score 1.91 goals per game on average and Swit 1.48. The 3 Liga Group 1 average is 3.42 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 68% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Warta Sieradz's matches and 57% of Swit's.
What form are Warta Sieradz and Swit in?
Over the last 5 games Warta Sieradz have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Swit 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Warta Sieradz vs Swit?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.