Warta Sieradz vs Wigry Suwałki: match statistics
Warta Sieradz vs Wigry Suwałki: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Warta Sieradz played Wigry Suwałki in 3 Liga Group 1 (Poland). The match was played on 22 May 2026. Venue: Stadion MOSiR. Final score: 2:1.
Current form
Warta Sieradz: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Wigry Suwałki: 4-1-0, 2.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Warta Sieradz scores 1.91 and concedes 1.03 goals per match. Wigry Suwałki scores 1.84 and concedes 1.22. League average: 3.33 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Warta Sieradz 69%, Wigry Suwałki 56%. Over 2.5: Warta Sieradz 63%, Wigry Suwałki 66%. League level: BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 65%.
xG, shots and style
Wigry Suwałki has higher xG: 1.50 vs 1.49. Warta Sieradz: 10.1 shots per match, Wigry Suwałki: 7.6.
Match halves
Warta Sieradz: half-time lead 31%, second-half goals 1.22. Wigry Suwałki: half-time lead 50%, second-half goals 0.78.
Goals by minute
Warta Sieradz: 61-75 (16 goals). Wigry Suwałki: 16-30 (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
3 Liga Group 1: 3.33 goals per match, BTTS 61%, Over 2.5 65%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a Warta Sieradz win (1). Both teams have 19 wins this season, but Warta performs better at home: they score 2.19 goals per home match with a 19% conversion rate, while Wigry score 1.5 goals away with a 12% conversion. The hosts average 5.2 on-target shots per home match versus 4.07 for the away side, have not recorded a goalless game at home (FTS 0% vs 31% for Wigry) and concede lower xG against (1.25 vs 1.75). The visitors’ recent run is in their favor — Wigry have scored 12 goals in the last 5 matches and average 2.6 points in that period, while Warta have 9 goals and 1.8 points — which increases their upset potential. In summary, Warta’s home record (+17 home goal difference vs 0 for Wigry on the road) and superior efficiency give them a small but tangible edge.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have a seasonal BTTS rate of 56% and 60% in the last 5 matches, while the league BTTS level is 61%, strongly favoring a Both Teams To Score scenario. Warta as the home side averages 2.19 goals scored and concedes 0.94 (44% clean sheets), whereas Wigry average 1.5 scored and 1.5 conceded with only 19% clean sheets, so the visitors are more prone to concede. xG shows 1.76 xG for Warta versus 1.31 for Wigry, and xG against Wigry reaches 1.75; additionally Warta has a higher conversion rate of 17% versus Wigry’s 12%, increasing the likelihood of a home goal. In the last 5 matches Wigry have averaged 2.4 scored and 0.6 conceded (12 goals in 5), Warta 1.8 and 1.0 (9 goals in 5), so both teams are in attacking form. Considering the seasonal 56%, recent 60%, league 61% and Wigry’s weaker defensive metrics (1.5 goals conceded season average and only 19% clean sheets), I favor the ‘BTTS - Yes’ scenario and rate BTTS at 65% vs 35% for ‘No’.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I estimate total expected goals at 3.15 (1.76 for Warta and 1.39 for Wigry), calculated as the average of the team’s xG and the opponent’s xG: for Warta used xG attack 1.76 and opponent xG 1.75, for Wigry xG attack 1.31 and opponent xG 1.47. A Poisson model with lambda=3.15 gives probability of more than 1.5 goals at about 82% (probability of at most 1 goal ≈17.8%), which aligns with seasonal Over1.5 rates: Warta 81% and Wigry 81% and the league average 3.33 goals/match. For the 2.5 line the model indicates Over ≈61% (Under ≈39%), while seasonal Over2.5 are 63% for Warta and 69% for Wigry, so the 2.5 line is moderately favorable for Over. At 3.5 the Over chance is ≈39% vs Under ≈61%; Warta’s seasonal Over3.5 is 31% and Wigry’s 44%, therefore Under 3.5 is safer than Over. The strongest signal is Over 1.5 (82%), therefore I recommend backing the Over side on the 1.5 line; additionally Warta averages 5.44 shots on target and has a conversion rate of 17% versus Wigry’s 4.07 and 12%, which supports generating goalscoring opportunities.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I forecast 1/1 — the home team leads at half-time and ultimately wins the match. Warta Sieradz led at the break in 10 matches (63%), scoring on average 1.13 goals at the half while conceding only 0.31 (half-time advantage +0.82), so HT favors the home side. Over the full match Warta averages 2.19 goals versus Wigry’s 1.50, has a higher xG (1.76 vs 1.31) and a better defense (0.94 goals conceded per game vs 1.50 for the visitors), which supports maintaining the lead after the break. Additionally, the hosts record more shots on target (5.44 vs 4.07) and higher conversion (17% vs 12%), and in second halves they have a positive goal balance (+7) and collected 28 points (an average of 1.75 points in the 2nd half) versus Wigry’s -6 and 17 points (1.06 average), all of which increase the chance of a full-time victory. Although Wigry have been in good form over the last 5 matches (80% wins and 2.4 goals per game), the season-long and HT statistics favor Warta, so the strongest signal is 1/1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Warta Sieradz | Wigry Suwałki | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 42% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.15 | 0.20 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.46 | 0.61 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Wigry Suwałki is 44% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Warta Sieradz · 2.6 pts / match - Wigry Suwałki
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Warta Sieradz is 18% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.03 goals / match - Warta Sieradz · 1.22 goals / match - Wigry Suwałki
Warta Sieradz scores in 97% of matches (31 of 32 matches), while Wigry Suwałki keeps a clean sheet in 31% (10 of 32 matches).
Wigry Suwałki scores in 81% of matches (26 of 32 matches), while Warta Sieradz keeps a clean sheet in 31% (10 of 32 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Warta Sieradz
Over / Under - Wigry Suwałki
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Wigry Suwałki is 28% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.44 pts / match - Warta Sieradz · 1.84 pts / match - Wigry Suwałki
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Warta Sieradz - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 31% of matches and wins 59%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Wigry Suwałki - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 50% of matches and wins 59%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 2.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 60% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +9 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (16 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Warta Sieradz
Wigry Suwałki
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3 Liga Group 1).
Teams vs league
| Warta Sieradz | Liga | Wigry Suwałki | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.94 | 3.33 | ▼ 3.06 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 69% | 61% | ▼ 56% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 63% | 65% | • 66% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 31% | 21% | ▲ 31% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 69% | 75% | ▲ 78% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 88% | 84% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Warta SieradzGoalBartłomiej Kręcichwost
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Warta Sieradz 1 - 0 - 0 Wigry Suwałki. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Warta Sieradz vs Wigry Suwałki?
The 3 Liga Group 1 match finished Warta Sieradz 2:1 Wigry Suwałki. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Warta Sieradz vs Wigry Suwałki?
Warta Sieradz score 1.91 goals per game on average and Wigry Suwałki 1.84. The 3 Liga Group 1 average is 3.33 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 69% of Warta Sieradz's matches and 56% of Wigry Suwałki's.
What form are Warta Sieradz and Wigry Suwałki in?
Over the last 5 games Warta Sieradz have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Wigry Suwałki 4-1-0 (2.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Warta Sieradz vs Wigry Suwałki?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


