Waterford vs Sligo Rovers: match statistics
Waterford vs Sligo Rovers: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Waterford played Sligo Rovers in Premier Division (Ireland). The match was played on 12 June 2026. Venue: Waterford Regional Sports Centre. Final score: 4:0.
Current form
Waterford: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Sligo Rovers: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.
Goal statistics
Waterford scores 1.11 and concedes 2.11 goals per match. Sligo Rovers scores 0.79 and concedes 1.42. League average: 2.71 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Waterford 63%, Sligo Rovers 42%. Over 2.5: Waterford 47%, Sligo Rovers 42%. League level: BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 50%.
xG, shots and style
Waterford has higher xG: 1.29 vs 1.13. Waterford: 11.9 shots per match, Sligo Rovers: 10.1.
Match halves
Waterford: half-time lead 16%, second-half goals 0.58. Sligo Rovers: half-time lead 21%, second-half goals 0.37.
Goals by minute
Waterford: 31-45+ (6 goals). Sligo Rovers: 46-60 (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Premier Division: 2.71 goals per match, BTTS 60%, Over 2.5 50%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 6 previous H2H matches were available: 1-1-4. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 33%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The draw (X) is the most likely outcome because Waterford draws 67% of home matches, while Sligo lose 56% of away games, which favors a split of points. The hosts have an edge in chance creation: on average 1.11 goals per game with xG 1.26, 11.22 shots and 3.67 on target, whereas Sligo away produce 0.67 goals with xG 0.99, 8.67 shots and 2.44 on target and fail to score in 56% of away fixtures. Both defenses are vulnerable — Waterford concede 1.33 goals at home with xG against 1.98, and Sligo concede 1.22 away with xG against 2.11, suggesting the possibility of goal-scoring opportunities for both sides. In the last 5 matches Waterford scored 9 goals (1.8 per game) versus Sligo’s 5 goals (1.0), but both teams average 1 point per game over this period, indicating inconsistent results. In summary, I expect a draw with a slight advantage to the hosts in chance creation, hence the X pick with a moderate probability of a Waterford win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes because in the last 5 matches Waterford has BTTS 100% (5/5) and Sligo 80% (4/5), which is a strong signal of form for both sides. Season-long BTTS is 40% for Waterford and 44% for Sligo, but the league average BTTS is 60%, so the competition environment favors both teams scoring. Both sides concede relatively frequently: Waterford concedes 1.6 goals seasonally and 2.4 in the last 5, while Sligo concedes 1.22 seasonally and 1.8 in the last 5, which increases the likelihood of goals from both teams. xG and shot data confirm an open game — Waterford has xG_for 1.25 and xG_against 1.7, Sligo has xG_for 0.99 and xG_against 2.11, with average shots 11.3 vs 8.67 and shots on target 2.9 vs 2.44, suggesting offensive situations from both sides. Considering the 100% and 80% in the last 5 matches and the high xG against both teams, I assess BTTS at about 75% versus 25% for No Goal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I estimate total expected goals at 2.85: Waterford about 1.60 (based on xG_for 1.25 and a high xG_against vs Sligo 2.11), and Sligo about 1.25 (xG_for 0.99 and xG_against vs Waterford 1.70). In the last 5 games Waterford fixtures averaged 4.2 goals (9 scored and 12 conceded), and Sligo’s games averaged 2.8 goals (5+9), while the league average is 2.71 goals per match. Historically Waterford at home records 80% of matches Over 1.5 and 40% Over 2.5, Sligo has 44% and 44% respectively; however in the last 5 matches Over 2.5 occurred for Waterford in 100% and for Sligo in 60%, and BTTS in the last 5 is 100% (Waterford) and 80% (Sligo). Additionally Waterford averages 11.3 shots per match, Sligo 8.67, which combined with Sligo’s vulnerable defense (xG_against 2.11) increases the likelihood of goals. Based on this, the strongest signal from the data is Over 1.5 (I recommend backing the line 1.5).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is Waterford leading at the break and ultimately the hosts winning (1/1). Waterford led at half-time in 30% of matches, while Sligo did so in only 11%; in the last 5 games the hosts led at the break in 20% and averaged 1.0 goals by half-time versus Sligo’s 0.4. The chance metrics also favor Waterford: the hosts average 11.3 shots and 1.25 xG per game compared to the visitors’ 8.67 shots and 0.99 xG, while Sligo concedes as much as 2.11 xG per match. Although Waterford concedes on average 1.6 goals per game and 0.9 goals after the break, and Sligo concedes only 0.56 goals in second halves, the hosts score more goals by half-time (0.5 vs 0.33) and have accumulated 12 points won in halves versus 7 for the visitors, which increases the probability of maintaining the lead.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Waterford | Sligo Rovers | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 29% | 27% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Waterford is 41% better for: goals scored per match.
1.11 goals / match - Waterford · 0.79 goals / match - Sligo Rovers
Sligo Rovers is 49% better for: goals conceded per match.
2.11 goals / match - Waterford · 1.42 goals / match - Sligo Rovers
Waterford scores in 63% of matches (12 of 19 matches), while Sligo Rovers keeps a clean sheet in 26% (5 of 19 matches).
Sligo Rovers scores in 53% of matches (10 of 19 matches), while Waterford keeps a clean sheet in 5% (1 of 19 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Waterford
Over / Under - Sligo Rovers
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Sligo Rovers is 27% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.79 pts / match - Waterford · 1 pts / match - Sligo Rovers
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Waterford - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 16% of matches and wins 5%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Sligo Rovers - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 21% of matches and wins 26%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Waterford
Sligo Rovers
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Premier Division).
Teams vs league
| Waterford | Liga | Sligo Rovers | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.21 | 2.71 | ▼ 2.21 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 63% | 60% | ▼ 42% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 47% | 50% | ▼ 42% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 5% | 25% | • 26% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 89% | 71% | ▲ 74% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 79% | 76% | ▼ 63% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (6): Waterford 1 - 1 - 4 Sligo Rovers. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 33% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Waterford vs Sligo Rovers?
The Premier Division match finished Waterford 4:0 Sligo Rovers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Waterford and Sligo Rovers?
In the last 6 head-to-head matches Waterford won 1, Sligo Rovers won 4 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Waterford vs Sligo Rovers?
Waterford score 1.11 goals per game on average and Sligo Rovers 0.79. The Premier Division average is 2.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Waterford's matches and 42% of Sligo Rovers's.
What form are Waterford and Sligo Rovers in?
Over the last 5 games Waterford have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Sligo Rovers 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Waterford vs Sligo Rovers?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


