Austria - BundesligaTivoli Stadion TirolData current as of 17 October 2026

Wattens vs Salzburg: match statistics

Wattens crest
Wattens
0 : 3half-time 0:2
Salzburg crest
Salzburg

Wattens vs Salzburg: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Wattens played Salzburg in Bundesliga (Austria). The match was played on 16 August 2026. Venue: Tivoli Stadion Tirol. Final score: 0:3.

Current form

Wattens: 0-1-1, 0.50 points/match. Salzburg: 1-1-0, 2.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Wattens scores 1.00 and concedes 2.00 goals per match. Salzburg scores 1.00 and concedes 0.50. League average: 2.47 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Wattens 100%, Salzburg 50%. Over 2.5: Wattens 50%, Salzburg 0%. League level: BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 47%.

xG, shots and style

Salzburg has higher xG: 2.93 vs 0.82. Wattens: 8.5 shots per match, Salzburg: 27.0.

Match halves

Wattens: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 0.00. Salzburg: half-time lead 0%, second-half goals 1.00.

Goals by minute

Wattens: 0-15 (1 goals). Salzburg: 76-90+ (2 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Bundesliga: 2.47 goals per match, BTTS 53%, Over 2.5 47%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-1. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Salzburg are showing clearly better current form: they have collected 10 points from their last five matches, winning 3 games, while Wattens have managed only 4 points and suffered 3 defeats. The visitors scored 11 goals during this period, compared with 10 for the hosts, but Salzburg’s defense conceded just 5 goals versus Wattens’ 9. The strongest argument in favor of the away side is the quality of chances created on the road: their average xG stands at 2.22, compared with just 0.82 for Wattens, while Salzburg’s opponents average only 0.97 xG. Salzburg also dominate match control, averaging 68% possession and 18 shots, including 10 on target, whereas Wattens record 43% possession, 8 attempts and just 1 shot on target. Both teams drew their respective home and away matches, but the visitors’ advantage in attacking intensity and defensive stability points to a Salzburg victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The case for both sides to score is built primarily on their current form: in their last 5 matches, both Wattens and Salzburg recorded BTTS in 60% of games. During this period, Wattens averaged 2.0 goals scored but conceded 1.8, while Salzburg scored 2.2 goals per match and conceded 1.0. Their attacking potential is supported by xG: Salzburg generate an average of 2.34 xG, while Wattens produce 1.49, with the hosts allowing opponents 1.46 xG. Salzburg should find a way past a Wattens side that has conceded 9 goals in 5 appearances, while the hosts have genuine scoring potential against visitors who have conceded 5 goals over the same period.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals, as both teams have averaged at least 2.0 goals scored over their last five matches: Wattens 2.0 and Salzburg 2.2. Wattens conceded 1.8 goals per game during this period, while Salzburg created a high volume of chances with an average of 2.34 xG, which clearly supports the visitors’ attacking output. The hosts also have solid grounds to score, with an average home xG of 3.63, while Salzburg’s away data shows an average of 0.97 xG conceded. Both teams scored in 60% of Wattens’ last five matches and in 60% of the matches involving both teams, making a minimum of two goals more likely than a low-scoring game. The 2.5 line also has supporting arguments, but with a projected total of 3.10 goals, Over 1.5 provides the safer and clearer signal.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest Half-Time signal is a draw: in the current data for both teams, 100% of matches ended the first half goalless, while Salzburg were also level at the break in 60% of their last five matches. After the interval, the visitors have a clearer edge, as Salzburg have recently averaged 1.6 goals in the second half and have not lost that period in any of their last five matches, whereas Wattens lost the second half in 60% of their games. Full-match form also favours Salzburg: the visitors have won 3 of their last 5 matches and average 2.2 goals, while Wattens have only 1 victory and concede an average of 1.8 goals. However, the hosts have strong chance-creation metrics, with an xG of 3.63 compared with Salzburg’s 2.22, so scenarios involving a home win remain relevant. Nevertheless, the most likely outcome is a draw at half-time followed by a Salzburg victory after the break.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

39Possession (%)61
WattensSalzburg
14Shots22
WattensSalzburg
5Shots on target12
WattensSalzburg
1.41xG2.53
WattensSalzburg
2Corners7
WattensSalzburg
24Dangerous attacks41
WattensSalzburg
9Fouls8
WattensSalzburg
3Cards0
WattensSalzburg

Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1Goals scored / match1
WattensSalzburg
2Goals conceded / match0.5
WattensSalzburg
44%Average possession71%
WattensSalzburg
1.5Shots on target / match8.5
WattensSalzburg

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.5Shots per match27
WattensSalzburg
1.5Shots on target8.5
WattensSalzburg
11.8%Shot conversion3.7%
WattensSalzburg
44%Possession71%
WattensSalzburg
0.82xG for2.93
WattensSalzburg
1.63xG against0.74
WattensSalzburg

Shooting quality

Wattens: BalancedSalzburg: Dominant
WattensSalzburg
Accuracy (shots on target)18%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.100.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.670.12

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Salzburg is 300% better for: last-5 form.

0.5 pts / match - Wattens · 2 pts / match - Salzburg

Wattens
DL
No win in the last 5 matches
Season result split
0% W50% D50% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-1
0.50 pts / match · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-1
0.50 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 at home
0-1-0
D
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 0.82Opponent xG: 1.63BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 50%
Salzburg
WD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
50% W50% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / match · goal difference +1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-0
2.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 away
0-1-0
D
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.5xG: 2.93Opponent xG: 0.74BTTS: 50%Over 2.5: 0%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Salzburg is 300% better for: goals conceded per match.

2 goals / match - Wattens · 0.5 goals / match - Salzburg

Wattens scoring profile: very strong

Wattens scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Salzburg keeps a clean sheet in 50% (1 of 2 matches).

Salzburg scoring profile: very strong

Salzburg scores in 100% of matches (2 of 2 matches), while Wattens keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 2 matches).

2Goals scored (season)2
WattensSalzburg
4Goals conceded (season)1
WattensSalzburg
3Average goals in match1.5
WattensSalzburg
2Goals scored (last 5)2
WattensSalzburg
4Goals conceded (last 5)1
WattensSalzburg

How often they score at least...

100%1 goal100%
WattensSalzburg
0%2 goals0%
WattensSalzburg
0%3 goals0%
WattensSalzburg
0%4 goals0%
WattensSalzburg

How often they concede at least...

100%1 goal50%
WattensSalzburg
50%2 goals0%
WattensSalzburg
50%3 goals0%
WattensSalzburg
0%4 goals0%
WattensSalzburg

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

100%BTTS at half-time0%
WattensSalzburg
0%BTTS in both halves0%
WattensSalzburg
0%Scored in both halves0%
WattensSalzburg

BTTS and goal count

50%Min. 3 goals and BTTS0%
WattensSalzburg
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
WattensSalzburg
100%BTTS - last 550%
WattensSalzburg

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

100%Min. 1 goal before half-time0%
WattensSalzburg
100%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
WattensSalzburg
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
WattensSalzburg

2nd half

50%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
WattensSalzburg
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
WattensSalzburg
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
WattensSalzburg

Match halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Wattens - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing
Salzburg - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1
WattensSalzburg
1Goals scored (1st half)0
WattensSalzburg
1Goals conceded (1st half)0
WattensSalzburg
2Average goals (1st half)0
WattensSalzburg
0%Clean sheet before half-time100%
WattensSalzburg
0%No goal before half-time100%
WattensSalzburg

After half-time (2nd half)

0.5Points per match (2nd half)2
WattensSalzburg
0Goals scored (2nd half)1
WattensSalzburg
1Goals conceded (2nd half)0.5
WattensSalzburg
1Average goals (2nd half)1.5
WattensSalzburg
50%Clean sheet after half-time50%
WattensSalzburg
100%No goal after half-time0%
WattensSalzburg

Wattens - second-half results

0% W50% D50% L
2
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Salzburg - second-half results

50% W50% D0% L
2
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
4
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defence after half-time+0.5

Concedes 0.5 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Wattens - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.50
Goals scored / match1.00.0
Goals conceded / match1.01.0
Average goals in match2.01.0
1 goal100%50%
2 goals100%50%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet0%50%
No goal0%100%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 50% draw - 50% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 100% - Half-time goals total: 2
Salzburg - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.002.00
Goals scored / match0.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.00.5
Average goals in match0.01.5
1 goal0%100%
2 goals0%50%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%50%
No goal100%0%
Goal difference0+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 50% won - 50% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Wattens
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
0
2
16-30
1
0
31-45
0
1
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (1 goal). Concedes most in 16-30 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Salzburg
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
1
61-75
2
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.25
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
75%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+78%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
100%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Wattens

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.81
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.18
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.37
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
63%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
230%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-1.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 50% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Salzburg

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+2.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.69
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-1.93
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
115%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
31%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+1.0
Late goals
100% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
100%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Bundesliga).

Teams vs league

WattensLigaSalzburg
Average goals in match▲ 3.002.47▼ 1.50
Both teams scored▲ 100%53%▼ 50%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▲ 50%47%▼ 0%
Clean sheets▼ 0%23%▲ 50%
Goal before half-time▲ 100%67%▼ 0%
Goal after half-time▼ 50%73%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.47
Average goals per match
53%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.60
Home goals / match
0.87
Away goals / match
+84%
Home attack advantage
+46%
Home defence advantage
+40%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
7%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
47%
2 goals
0%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. SalzburgGoalKarim KonatéAssist: Frans Krätzig
  2. SalzburgGoalFrans KrätzigAssist: Yorbe Vertessen
  3. WattensYellow cardRaphael Gschösser
  4. SalzburgSubstitutionOn: Nikolas VeratschnigOff: Leandro Morgalla
  5. SalzburgSubstitutionOn: Sota KitanoOff: Yorbe Vertessen
  6. WattensSubstitutionOn: Nemanja CelicOff: Murat Şatin
  7. WattensYellow cardMichael Olakigbe
  8. SalzburgSubstitutionOn: Dominik Robin SchmidOff: Frans Krätzig
  9. SalzburgGoalSota KitanoAssist: Abobkar Bari
  10. WattensYellow cardNemanja Celic

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Wattens 1 - 0 - 1 Salzburg. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FC Salzburg
2 : 3
WSG Swarovski Wattens
WSG Swarovski Wattens
1 : 2
FC Salzburg

FAQ

What was the result of Wattens vs Salzburg?

The Bundesliga match finished Wattens 0:3 Salzburg. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Wattens and Salzburg?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Wattens won 1, Salzburg won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Wattens vs Salzburg?

Wattens score 1.00 goals per game on average and Salzburg 1.00. The Bundesliga average is 2.47 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 100% of Wattens's matches and 50% of Salzburg's.

What form are Wattens and Salzburg in?

Over the last 5 games Wattens have a 0-1-1 record (0.50 points per game) and Salzburg 1-1-0 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Wattens vs Salzburg?

The statistical background for Wattens vs Salzburg — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.