Wattens vs Wolfsberger AC: match statistics
Wattens vs Wolfsberger AC: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Wattens played Wolfsberger AC in Bundesliga (Austria). The match was played on 4 April 2026. Final score: 3:1.
Current form
Wattens: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Wolfsberger AC: 0-2-3, 0.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Wattens scores 1.38 and concedes 1.54 goals per match. Wolfsberger AC scores 1.33 and concedes 1.46. League average: 2.70 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Wattens 67%, Wolfsberger AC 67%. Over 2.5: Wattens 50%, Wolfsberger AC 63%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 51%.
xG, shots and style
Wolfsberger AC has higher xG: 1.30 vs 1.28. Wattens: 11.8 shots per match, Wolfsberger AC: 11.5.
Match halves
Wattens: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.71. Wolfsberger AC: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.46.
Goals by minute
Wattens: 31-45+ (7 goals). Wolfsberger AC: 0-15 (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Bundesliga: 2.70 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 51%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 2 previous H2H matches were available: 0-2-0. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 50%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a home win for Wattens. Wattens scored 8 goals in their last 5 matches and recorded 2 wins (D-W-W-L-L), while Wolfsberger managed only 4 goals in the same period and failed to win any of their last 5 fixtures (0-2-3), translating to 1.4 points per game for Wattens versus 0.4 for Wolfsberger. Home metrics favor Wattens: 1.58 goals per home game with xG 1.37, 12.58 shots per game and 4.25 on target (Failed To Score only 8%), whereas Wolfsberger on the road average 1.25 goals, xG 1.28, 10.92 shots and 4.08 on target with 25% of away games without a goal. Both teams conceded 10 goals in their last 5 matches, but Wolfsberger have higher average xG against on the road (1.54 vs 1.18 for the hosts) and a substantially higher away loss rate (58% vs 33% home loss rate), which diminishes their chances. Based on this I estimate roughly 60% for a Wattens win, 25% for a draw and 15% for Wolfsberger, with an expectation of a match featuring several goals (average total goals in Wattens’ home games 3.17 vs 2.92 in away games).
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have a seasonal BTTS rate of 67% each versus the league average of 56%, a strong signal in favor of BTTS - Yes. In the last 5 matches Wattens recorded BTTS in 80% of games, scoring on average 1.6 and conceding 2.0, while Wolfsberger had 60% BTTS in their last 5, scoring 0.8 and also conceding 2.0, indicating both sides have recently been prone to conceding. Additionally, Wattens kept a clean sheet in 25% of matches versus Wolfsberger’s 8%, and xG figures are similar (xG for 1.33 vs 1.28; xG against 1.34 vs 1.54), so neither defense looks sufficiently tight to rule out goals for both teams. The visitors register more shots on target (4.08 vs 3.58) and have scored 32 goals this season compared to Wattens’ 33, confirming realistic scoring potential for the visitors despite the lower last-5 average (0.8). Considering the above (double 67% BTTS, Wattens’ 80% BTTS in last 5, Wolfsberger’s only 8% clean sheets and an average of 2.0 goals conceded in the last 5), I assess BTTS probability at 72% vs 28% and pick 'yes'.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Expected goals are 1.44 for Wattens and 1.31 for Wolfsberger, totaling 2.75. With an expected sum of 2.75, the Poisson distribution gives roughly a 76% chance of at least 2 goals and about 52% chance of at least 3 goals, supporting a bet on Over 1.5 and slightly favoring Over 2.5. Additionally, season stats show Over 1.5 occurs in 83% of Wattens matches and 92% of Wolfsberger matches, and both teams score in 67% of meetings, which strengthens the signal for Over 1.5. Considering average shots (Wattens 12.0 with 3.58 on target, Wolfsberger 10.92 with 4.08 on target) and conversion rates of 12%/11%, I recommend backing Over 1.5 as the strongest pick; Over 2.5 is assessed at ~54% probability, and Over 3.5 at ~32%.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I back 1/1 (Wattens leading at half-time and winning). Wattens led at half-time in 5 of their home matches (42%), while Wolfsberger surrendered a lead on the road in 3 such fixtures (25%); additionally, in the last 5 matches hosts scored 11 goals before the break versus 6 for visitors. The home side also have a higher points-per-game at home (1.33) compared to the visitors away (0.92) and a better seasonal goal balance (1.42 scored and 1.25 conceded for Wattens vs 1.25/1.67 for Wolfsberger), which increases the likelihood of maintaining a lead. xG slightly favors Wattens (1.33 xG vs 1.28 xG), and with similar shot conversion rates (12% vs 11%) the hosts look more efficient, translating into an advantage late on. Although both teams share a seasonal BTTS rate of 67%, Wattens’ superior form over the last 5 matches (40% wins vs 0% for Wolfsberger) and the HT statistics point to a 1/1 Half-Time/Full-Time scenario.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Wattens | Wolfsberger AC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Wattens is 250% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / match - Wattens · 0.4 pts / match - Wolfsberger AC
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Wolfsberger AC is 5% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.54 goals / match - Wattens · 1.46 goals / match - Wolfsberger AC
Wattens scores in 79% of matches (19 of 24 matches), while Wolfsberger AC keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 24 matches).
Wolfsberger AC scores in 79% of matches (19 of 24 matches), while Wattens keeps a clean sheet in 21% (5 of 24 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Wattens
Over / Under - Wolfsberger AC
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Wolfsberger AC is 29% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.13 pts / match - Wattens · 1.46 pts / match - Wolfsberger AC
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Wattens - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Wolfsberger AC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 29%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 2.2 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -6 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (7 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Wattens
Wolfsberger AC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Bundesliga).
Teams vs league
| Wattens | Liga | Wolfsberger AC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 2.92 | 2.70 | • 2.79 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 57% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 50% | 51% | ▲ 63% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 21% | 24% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 83% | 75% | ▲ 79% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 79% | 74% | ▲ 83% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): Wattens 0 - 2 - 0 Wolfsberger AC. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Wattens vs Wolfsberger AC?
The Bundesliga match finished Wattens 3:1 Wolfsberger AC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Wattens and Wolfsberger AC?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Wattens won 0, Wolfsberger AC won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Wattens vs Wolfsberger AC?
Wattens score 1.38 goals per game on average and Wolfsberger AC 1.33. The Bundesliga average is 2.70 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Wattens's matches and 67% of Wolfsberger AC's.
What form are Wattens and Wolfsberger AC in?
Over the last 5 games Wattens have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Wolfsberger AC 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Wattens vs Wolfsberger AC?
The statistical background for Wattens vs Wolfsberger AC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


