Poland - 3 Liga Group 2Stadion MiejskiData current as of 08 September 2026

Wda Świecie vs Noteć Czarnków: match statistics

Wda Świecie vs Noteć Czarnków: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Wda Świecie played Noteć Czarnków in 3 Liga Group 2 (Poland). The match was played on 30 May 2026. Venue: Stadion Miejski. Final score: 1:3.

Current form

Wda Świecie: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Noteć Czarnków: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.

Goal statistics

Wda Świecie scores 1.30 and concedes 1.91 goals per match. Noteć Czarnków scores 1.36 and concedes 1.36. League average: 2.99 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Wda Świecie 48%, Noteć Czarnków 42%. Over 2.5: Wda Świecie 58%, Noteć Czarnków 48%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 58%.

xG, shots and style

Noteć Czarnków has higher xG: 1.76 vs 1.37. Wda Świecie: 10.2 shots per match, Noteć Czarnków: 8.9.

Match halves

Wda Świecie: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.76. Noteć Czarnków: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.70.

Goals by minute

Wda Świecie: 76-90+ (14 goals). Noteć Czarnków: 0-15 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

3 Liga Group 2: 2.99 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 58%.

Head-to-head

Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I back an away win for Noteć Czarnków. The key argument is recent form: Noteć have conceded only 3 goals in their last 5 matches (0.6 goals per game), while Wda Świecie have shipped 18 in their last 5 (3.6 goals per game). Noteć generate more chances — on average 13.54 shots and 5.23 on target away with xG 1.66, versus 11.93 shots and 4.87 on target at home and xG 1.51 — indicating superior attacking quality from the visitors. The hosts are more efficient in chance conversion (15% and 1.69 goals at home) and are less likely to be shut out (FTS 19% vs 44% for Noteć), yet they have lower PPG in the last 5 matches (1.2 vs 1.4 for Noteć). Considering Noteć’s advantage in xG and shots and Wda’s sharp defensive decline, I favour the visitors.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal BTTS rates are 47% for Wda and 38% for Noteć, both below the league average of 52%, indicating a lower-than-average incidence of both teams scoring. In the last 5 matches Wda registered BTTS in 60% (3/5) while Noteć only in 20% (1/5); over that period Wda conceded 18 goals (3.6 per game) and Noteć only 3 (0.6 per game), highlighting Noteć’s defensive advantage. Wda creates a high volume of chances (xG 2.37 per game and 7.13 shots on target) but has a low conversion rate of 6% and a seasonal goals average of 1.35, whereas Noteć posts xG 1.66, 5.23 shots on target and a better conversion of 11% with 1.38 goals per game. Additionally, Noteć has 38% clean sheets this season versus Wda’s 18%, which, together with its low seasonal BTTS of 38%, points toward matches more likely to finish No Goal/clean sheet expected. Considering these figures, the stronger signal is No BTTS, so I assess probability at 35% for BTTS - Yes and 65% for No.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

I calculated expected goals as the average of a team’s attacking xG and the opponent’s xG conceded: the home side has attacking xG 2.37 versus the away conceded xG 1.49, yielding expected 1.93 goals; the visitors 1.66 attacking xG versus 1.01 conceded xG yields 1.34, totaling 3.27 goals. Seasonal indicators support the Over: hosts score over 1.5 goals in 76% of matches, visitors in 69%, and the league registers 57% of matches with Over 2.5 goals. Additionally, the hosts have conceded 63 goals this season and as many as 18 in the last 5 matches (an average of 3.6 per match), while generating many chances (xG 2.37 with a low conversion rate of 6%), which increases the likelihood of high-scoring games. A Poisson model on the 3.27 total gives roughly an 84% probability of Over 1.5 goals, about 64% for Over 2.5 and around 41% for Over 3.5, so the strongest signal is Over 1.5. I recommend backing Over 1.5; Over 2.5 can be considered as a medium-risk option, while Over 3.5 is too uncertain given the seasonal 24–31% frequency of such results for both teams.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Averaging the teams’ half-time distributions yields an approximate HT breakdown: home teams lead at the break in ~28.5% of cases (24% and 33%), a draw occurs in ~34.5% (29% and 40%), and away teams lead in ~37% (47% and 27%). Noteć led at the break in 27% of matches and held the lead after the break in 67% of those situations (seasonFTSPercentageHT_away=67%), while Wda were trailing at the break in as many as 47% of games. On the other hand, Wda have a higher xG of 2.37 versus 1.66, more shots (16.25 vs 13.54) and score on average 0.88 goals after the break compared to the visitors’ 0.53, so they are capable of comebacks, which increases the probability of X/1 and 1/1 scenarios. Aggregating these indicators (multiplying the HT distribution by the hold-rate of leads — 71% for hosts and 67% for guests — and by the ratio of post-break goals) produced the highest probability for 2/2 at about 25%, then X/1 ~22% and 1/1 ~19%; therefore I recommend the HT/FT pick 2/2 (away team leads at the break and wins the match).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Half-by-half

1 : 2
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

41Possession (%)59
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków
10Shots11
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków
6Shots on target6
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków
1.61xG1.56
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków
5Corners8
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków
76Dangerous attacks60
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków
-1Fouls-1
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków
-1Cards-1
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków
1.3Goals scored / match1.36
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków
1.91Goals conceded / match1.36
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków
47%Average possession32%
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków
3.67Shots on target / match3.42
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

10.15Shots per match8.91
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków
3.67Shots on target3.42
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków
12.8%Shot conversion15.3%
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków
47%Possession32%
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków
1.37xG for1.76
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków
1.65xG against1.43
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków

Shooting quality

Wda Świecie: Counter-attackingNoteć Czarnków: Counter-attacking
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków
Accuracy (shots on target)36%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.20
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.40

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Noteć Czarnków is 17% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / match - Wda Świecie · 1.4 pts / match - Noteć Czarnków

Wda Świecie
WWLLL
Season result split
42% W18% R39% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-6-13
1.45 pts / match · goal difference -20
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
9-1-6
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
WLWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 3.6xG: 1.28Opponent xG: 1.69BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%
Noteć Czarnków
LLWDW
Season result split
39% W18% R42% P
Season (W-D-L)
13-6-14
1.36 pts / match · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-4-6
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DLLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.84Opponent xG: 1.73BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Noteć Czarnków is 5% better for: goals scored per match.

1.3 goals / match - Wda Świecie · 1.36 goals / match - Noteć Czarnków

Noteć Czarnków is 40% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.91 goals / match - Wda Świecie · 1.36 goals / match - Noteć Czarnków

Wda Świecie scoring profile: very strong

Wda Świecie scores in 73% of matches (24 of 33 matches), while Noteć Czarnków keeps a clean sheet in 27% (9 of 33 matches).

Noteć Czarnków scoring profile: strong

Noteć Czarnków scores in 61% of matches (20 of 33 matches), while Wda Świecie keeps a clean sheet in 30% (10 of 33 matches).

43Goals scored (season)45
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków
63Goals conceded (season)45
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków
3.21Average goals in match2.73
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków
8Goals scored (last 5)6
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków
18Goals conceded (last 5)3
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków

How often they score at least...

73%1 goal61%
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków
42%2 goals42%
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków
15%3 goals21%
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków
0%4 goals6%
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków

How often they concede at least...

70%1 goal73%
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków
39%2 goals36%
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków
27%3 goals18%
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków
15%4 goals6%
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

42%
Noteć Czarnków - BTTSBTTS - percentage of matches where both teams scored.14 of 33 matches
52%
League average

Goal patterns

21%BTTS at half-time15%
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków
6%BTTS in both halves9%
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków
24%Scored in both halves21%
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków

BTTS and goal count

39%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków
18%Min. 3 goals without BTTS15%
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków
60%BTTS - last 520%
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time70%
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków
42%Min. 2 goals before half-time36%
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków

2nd half

76%Min. 1 goal after half-time61%
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków
45%Min. 2 goals after half-time36%
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków
24%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Noteć Czarnków is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.91 pts / match - Wda Świecie · 1.09 pts / match - Noteć Czarnków

Wda Świecie - half-time state
12% leading55% draw33% trailing
Noteć Czarnków - half-time state
24% leading36% draw39% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.91Points per match (1st half)1.09
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków
0.39Goals scored (1st half)0.55
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków
0.91Goals conceded (1st half)0.7
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków
1.3Average goals (1st half)1.24
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków
48%Clean sheet before half-time45%
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków
67%No goal before half-time70%
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków

After half-time (2nd half)

1.33Points per match (2nd half)1.42
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków
0.76Goals scored (2nd half)0.7
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków
0.94Goals conceded (2nd half)0.61
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków
1.7Average goals (2nd half)1.3
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków
52%Clean sheet after half-time61%
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków
45%No goal after half-time52%
Wda ŚwiecieNoteć Czarnków

Wda Świecie - second-half results

30% W42% R27% P
30
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-17
Goal difference (1st half)
44
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.91
PPG before half-time
Lead holding350%

Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.0

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Noteć Czarnków - second-half results

30% W52% R18% P
36
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
47
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.09
PPG before half-time
Lead holding163%

Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Wda Świecie - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.40
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match2.01.6
Average goals in match2.62.6
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals40%40%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-7-3
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Noteć Czarnków - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.201.80
Goals scored / match0.80.4
Goals conceded / match0.60.0
Average goals in match1.40.4
1 goal100%40%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%100%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference+1+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Wda Świecie
ScoredConceded
9
11
0-15
3
9
16-30
6
12
31-45
5
8
46-60
6
12
61-75
14
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

Noteć Czarnków
ScoredConceded
9
6
0-15
7
8
16-30
6
11
31-45
8
6
46-60
8
6
61-75
7
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.96
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
99%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
45%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+1%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
45%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Wda Świecie

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.28
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+16.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.07
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
81%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
137%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.25
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 21% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

Noteć Czarnków

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.33
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.33
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.40
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.07
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
98%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
85%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.04
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3 Liga Group 2).

Teams vs league

Wda ŚwiecieLigaNoteć Czarnków
Average goals in match 3.212.99 2.73
Both teams scored 48%52% 42%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 58%58% 48%
Clean sheets 30%28% 27%
Goal before half-time 64%70% 70%
Goal after half-time 76%74% 61%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.99
Average goals per match
52%
Both teams scored
58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.60
Home goals / match
1.39
Away goals / match
+15%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defence advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
70%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Other recorded players

Jan Bonikowski⚽ 1

Away team

Other recorded players

Hubert Szulc⚽ 1
Tobiasz Starosta⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Wda ŚwiecieGoalJan Bonikowski
  2. Noteć CzarnkówGoalHubert Szulc
  3. Noteć CzarnkówGoalTobiasz Starosta

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Wda Świecie 0 - 0 - 1 Noteć Czarnków. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

Noteć Czarnków
3 : 0
Wda Świecie

FAQ

What was the result of Wda Świecie vs Noteć Czarnków?

The 3 Liga Group 2 match finished Wda Świecie 1:3 Noteć Czarnków. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Wda Świecie vs Noteć Czarnków?

Wda Świecie score 1.30 goals per game on average and Noteć Czarnków 1.36. The 3 Liga Group 2 average is 2.99 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Wda Świecie's matches and 42% of Noteć Czarnków's.

What form are Wda Świecie and Noteć Czarnków in?

Over the last 5 games Wda Świecie have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Noteć Czarnków 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Wda Świecie vs Noteć Czarnków?

The statistical background for Wda Świecie vs Noteć Czarnków — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.