Wda Świecie vs Noteć Czarnków: match statistics
Wda Świecie vs Noteć Czarnków: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Wda Świecie played Noteć Czarnków in 3 Liga Group 2 (Poland). The match was played on 30 May 2026. Venue: Stadion Miejski. Final score: 1:3.
Current form
Wda Świecie: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match. Noteć Czarnków: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Wda Świecie scores 1.30 and concedes 1.91 goals per match. Noteć Czarnków scores 1.36 and concedes 1.36. League average: 2.99 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Wda Świecie 48%, Noteć Czarnków 42%. Over 2.5: Wda Świecie 58%, Noteć Czarnków 48%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 58%.
xG, shots and style
Noteć Czarnków has higher xG: 1.76 vs 1.37. Wda Świecie: 10.2 shots per match, Noteć Czarnków: 8.9.
Match halves
Wda Świecie: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.76. Noteć Czarnków: half-time lead 24%, second-half goals 0.70.
Goals by minute
Wda Świecie: 76-90+ (14 goals). Noteć Czarnków: 0-15 (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
3 Liga Group 2: 2.99 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 58%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-1. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 0%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back an away win for Noteć Czarnków. The key argument is recent form: Noteć have conceded only 3 goals in their last 5 matches (0.6 goals per game), while Wda Świecie have shipped 18 in their last 5 (3.6 goals per game). Noteć generate more chances — on average 13.54 shots and 5.23 on target away with xG 1.66, versus 11.93 shots and 4.87 on target at home and xG 1.51 — indicating superior attacking quality from the visitors. The hosts are more efficient in chance conversion (15% and 1.69 goals at home) and are less likely to be shut out (FTS 19% vs 44% for Noteć), yet they have lower PPG in the last 5 matches (1.2 vs 1.4 for Noteć). Considering Noteć’s advantage in xG and shots and Wda’s sharp defensive decline, I favour the visitors.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal BTTS rates are 47% for Wda and 38% for Noteć, both below the league average of 52%, indicating a lower-than-average incidence of both teams scoring. In the last 5 matches Wda registered BTTS in 60% (3/5) while Noteć only in 20% (1/5); over that period Wda conceded 18 goals (3.6 per game) and Noteć only 3 (0.6 per game), highlighting Noteć’s defensive advantage. Wda creates a high volume of chances (xG 2.37 per game and 7.13 shots on target) but has a low conversion rate of 6% and a seasonal goals average of 1.35, whereas Noteć posts xG 1.66, 5.23 shots on target and a better conversion of 11% with 1.38 goals per game. Additionally, Noteć has 38% clean sheets this season versus Wda’s 18%, which, together with its low seasonal BTTS of 38%, points toward matches more likely to finish No Goal/clean sheet expected. Considering these figures, the stronger signal is No BTTS, so I assess probability at 35% for BTTS - Yes and 65% for No.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I calculated expected goals as the average of a team’s attacking xG and the opponent’s xG conceded: the home side has attacking xG 2.37 versus the away conceded xG 1.49, yielding expected 1.93 goals; the visitors 1.66 attacking xG versus 1.01 conceded xG yields 1.34, totaling 3.27 goals. Seasonal indicators support the Over: hosts score over 1.5 goals in 76% of matches, visitors in 69%, and the league registers 57% of matches with Over 2.5 goals. Additionally, the hosts have conceded 63 goals this season and as many as 18 in the last 5 matches (an average of 3.6 per match), while generating many chances (xG 2.37 with a low conversion rate of 6%), which increases the likelihood of high-scoring games. A Poisson model on the 3.27 total gives roughly an 84% probability of Over 1.5 goals, about 64% for Over 2.5 and around 41% for Over 3.5, so the strongest signal is Over 1.5. I recommend backing Over 1.5; Over 2.5 can be considered as a medium-risk option, while Over 3.5 is too uncertain given the seasonal 24–31% frequency of such results for both teams.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Averaging the teams’ half-time distributions yields an approximate HT breakdown: home teams lead at the break in ~28.5% of cases (24% and 33%), a draw occurs in ~34.5% (29% and 40%), and away teams lead in ~37% (47% and 27%). Noteć led at the break in 27% of matches and held the lead after the break in 67% of those situations (seasonFTSPercentageHT_away=67%), while Wda were trailing at the break in as many as 47% of games. On the other hand, Wda have a higher xG of 2.37 versus 1.66, more shots (16.25 vs 13.54) and score on average 0.88 goals after the break compared to the visitors’ 0.53, so they are capable of comebacks, which increases the probability of X/1 and 1/1 scenarios. Aggregating these indicators (multiplying the HT distribution by the hold-rate of leads — 71% for hosts and 67% for guests — and by the ratio of post-break goals) produced the highest probability for 2/2 at about 25%, then X/1 ~22% and 1/1 ~19%; therefore I recommend the HT/FT pick 2/2 (away team leads at the break and wins the match).
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Wda Świecie | Noteć Czarnków | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.20 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.40 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Noteć Czarnków is 17% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / match - Wda Świecie · 1.4 pts / match - Noteć Czarnków
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Noteć Czarnków is 5% better for: goals scored per match.
1.3 goals / match - Wda Świecie · 1.36 goals / match - Noteć Czarnków
Noteć Czarnków is 40% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.91 goals / match - Wda Świecie · 1.36 goals / match - Noteć Czarnków
Wda Świecie scores in 73% of matches (24 of 33 matches), while Noteć Czarnków keeps a clean sheet in 27% (9 of 33 matches).
Noteć Czarnków scores in 61% of matches (20 of 33 matches), while Wda Świecie keeps a clean sheet in 30% (10 of 33 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Wda Świecie
Over / Under - Noteć Czarnków
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Noteć Czarnków is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.91 pts / match - Wda Świecie · 1.09 pts / match - Noteć Czarnków
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Wda Świecie - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Noteć Czarnków - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 24% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 2.0 | 1.6 |
| Average goals in match | 2.6 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -7 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 0.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 100% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (14 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (9 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Wda Świecie
Noteć Czarnków
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3 Liga Group 2).
Teams vs league
| Wda Świecie | Liga | Noteć Czarnków | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.21 | 2.99 | ▼ 2.73 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 48% | 52% | ▼ 42% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 58% | 58% | ▼ 48% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 30% | 28% | • 27% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 64% | 70% | • 70% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 76% | 74% | ▼ 61% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Wda ŚwiecieGoalJan Bonikowski
- Noteć CzarnkówGoalHubert Szulc
- Noteć CzarnkówGoalTobiasz Starosta
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Wda Świecie 0 - 0 - 1 Noteć Czarnków. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Wda Świecie vs Noteć Czarnków?
The 3 Liga Group 2 match finished Wda Świecie 1:3 Noteć Czarnków. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Wda Świecie vs Noteć Czarnków?
Wda Świecie score 1.30 goals per game on average and Noteć Czarnków 1.36. The 3 Liga Group 2 average is 2.99 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Wda Świecie's matches and 42% of Noteć Czarnków's.
What form are Wda Świecie and Noteć Czarnków in?
Over the last 5 games Wda Świecie have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and Noteć Czarnków 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Wda Świecie vs Noteć Czarnków?
The statistical background for Wda Świecie vs Noteć Czarnków — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


