Wda Świecie vs Stargard Szczeciński: match statistics
Wda Świecie vs Stargard Szczeciński: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Wda Świecie played Stargard Szczeciński in 3 Liga Group 2 (Poland). The match was played on 18 April 2026. Final score: 3:2.
Current form
Wda Świecie: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Stargard Szczeciński: 0-1-4, 0.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
Wda Świecie scores 1.19 and concedes 1.62 goals per match. Stargard Szczeciński scores 1.58 and concedes 1.65. League average: 2.95 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Wda Świecie 42%, Stargard Szczeciński 62%. Over 2.5: Wda Świecie 54%, Stargard Szczeciński 62%. League level: BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 56%.
xG, shots and style
Stargard Szczeciński has higher xG: 1.44 vs 1.36. Wda Świecie: 9.8 shots per match, Stargard Szczeciński: 8.3.
Match halves
Wda Świecie: half-time lead 15%, second-half goals 0.65. Stargard Szczeciński: half-time lead 42%, second-half goals 0.81.
Goals by minute
Wda Świecie: 76-90+ (10 goals). Stargard Szczeciński: 76-90+ (13 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
3 Liga Group 2: 2.95 goals per match, BTTS 52%, Over 2.5 56%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 1 previous H2H matches were available: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Wda Świecie has a clear form advantage: in the last 5 matches they scored 8 goals and averaged 1.6 points per game, while Stargard scored 4 goals and averages only 0.2 points per game over the same period. At home Wda averages 1.54 goals per game, attempts 12.08 shots (4.92 on target) and has a conversion rate of 14%, while the visitors on the road average 1.46 goals, 11.3 shots (4.5 on target) and a 12% conversion. Both teams concede a lot this season (Wda 42, Stargard 43), however Wda has a higher clean sheet rate of 31% versus 15% for Stargard and in the last 5 matches they conceded 6 goals compared to 12 conceded by the visitors. Quality-of-chances analysis shows xG 1.53 for Wda with xG against 1.74, and for Stargard xG 1.39 with xG against 1.45, which suggests the hosts create slightly better chances despite defensive susceptibility. Considering better form, higher efficiency (14% vs 12%) and a superior recent-5 record, I forecast a home win: 60% Wda, 25% draw and 15% Stargard.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Both teams have a seasonal BTTS rate of 62% (Wda 62% and Stargard 62%), clearly above the league average of 52%. In the last 5 matches Wda recorded BTTS in 80% (4/5), and Stargard in 60% (3/5), providing a strong signal in favor of both teams scoring. Goal stats show Wda averages 1.69 goals scored (xG 1.51) and concedes 1.77, while Stargard scores 1.46 (xG 1.39) and concedes 1.54; in the last 5 matches the visitors have conceded as much as 2.4 goals on average. Additionally, the low clean sheet rate of only 15% for each team and on-target shots levels of 5.11 (Wda) vs 4.5 (Stargard) indicate a high number of situations that favor goals for both sides. It should be noted, however, that in the last 5 matches Stargard averaged only 0.8 goals, which slightly reduces the visitors' chances of regular scoring; nonetheless the aggregate signals (62% seasonal, Wda 80% L5, high average concessions 1.77 and 1.54) lean toward BTTS - Yes (72% vs 28%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The xG model projects 1.48 goals for the home side (xG attack 1.51 vs opponent xG defense 1.45, yielding 1.48) and 1.31 for the away side (1.39 vs 1.22, yielding 1.31), totaling approximately 2.79 expected goals. Season-long stats show strong probability for Over 1.5: home teams exceed 1.5 in 92% of matches, visitors in 85% (avg ~88.5%), therefore I rate Over 1.5 at 89%. For the 2.5 line, seasonal values are 69% (home) and 54% (away), average ~61.5%, and the expected 2.79 is slightly above 2.5, hence Over 2.5 = 62%. The 3.5 line has weaker backing: season Over 3.5 is 46% vs 38% (avg ~42%), but total xG 2.79 and the high threshold reduce probability to 36%. Additionally, both teams have an Both Teams To Score rate of 62%, and the home side scores 1.69 goals at home while conceding 1.77, which strengthens Over 1.5 as the strongest signal.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Visitors more often lead at the break — 46% of matches this season see them ahead at half-time versus 38% for hosts — and they scored 5 goals in minutes 0–15 compared to 2 for the hosts, which favors an early lead for the visitors. At the same time hosts look better after the break: in the last 5 matches they average 1.6 points and form ddwwl, whereas visitors have only 0.2 points and form llldl and concede on average 2.4 goals in those 5 matches, suggesting a possible turnaround. Hosts’ xG is 1.51 versus 1.39 for the visitors, and xG against is 1.22 versus 1.45, so hosts have a positive xG difference (+0.29) compared to -0.06 for the visitors, indicating a quality advantage in the latter stages of the match. Additionally hosts scored 5 goals in minutes 31–45 (visitors only 1) and another 5 goals in 76–90, which together with the above statistics makes the scenario of the visitors leading at half-time and the hosts winning the match (HT/FT 2/1) the most likely.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Wda Świecie | Stargard Szczeciński | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.14 | 0.17 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.49 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Wda Świecie is 700% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Wda Świecie · 0.2 pts / match - Stargard Szczeciński
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Stargard Szczeciński is 33% better for: goals scored per match.
1.19 goals / match - Wda Świecie · 1.58 goals / match - Stargard Szczeciński
Wda Świecie scores in 69% of matches (18 of 26 matches), while Stargard Szczeciński keeps a clean sheet in 15% (4 of 26 matches).
Stargard Szczeciński scores in 77% of matches (20 of 26 matches), while Wda Świecie keeps a clean sheet in 35% (9 of 26 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Wda Świecie
Over / Under - Stargard Szczeciński
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Stargard Szczeciński is 52% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.96 pts / match - Wda Świecie · 1.46 pts / match - Stargard Szczeciński
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Wda Świecie - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 15% of matches and wins 42%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Stargard Szczeciński - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 42% of matches and wins 35%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.80 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 2.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -9 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Wda Świecie
Stargard Szczeciński
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3 Liga Group 2).
Teams vs league
| Wda Świecie | Liga | Stargard Szczeciński | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.81 | 2.95 | ▲ 3.23 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 42% | 52% | ▲ 62% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 54% | 56% | ▲ 62% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 35% | 27% | ▼ 15% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 62% | 69% | ▲ 88% |
| Goal after half-time | • 73% | 73% | ▲ 81% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Stargard SzczecińskiGoalWojciech Fadecki
- Stargard SzczecińskiGoalWojciech Fadecki
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Wda Świecie 1 - 0 - 0 Stargard Szczeciński. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Wda Świecie vs Stargard Szczeciński?
The 3 Liga Group 2 match finished Wda Świecie 3:2 Stargard Szczeciński. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Wda Świecie vs Stargard Szczeciński?
Wda Świecie score 1.19 goals per game on average and Stargard Szczeciński 1.58. The 3 Liga Group 2 average is 2.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 42% of Wda Świecie's matches and 62% of Stargard Szczeciński's.
What form are Wda Świecie and Stargard Szczeciński in?
Over the last 5 games Wda Świecie have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Stargard Szczeciński 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Wda Świecie vs Stargard Szczeciński?
The statistical background for Wda Świecie vs Stargard Szczeciński — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


