Westchester SC vs Chattanooga Red Wolves: match statistics
Westchester SC vs Chattanooga Red Wolves: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Westchester SC played Chattanooga Red Wolves in USL League One (United States). The match was played on 2 September 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Current form
Westchester SC: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match. Chattanooga Red Wolves: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Westchester SC scores 1.55 and concedes 1.55 goals per match. Chattanooga Red Wolves scores 1.90 and concedes 1.67. League average: 2.96 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Westchester SC 50%, Chattanooga Red Wolves 67%. Over 2.5: Westchester SC 55%, Chattanooga Red Wolves 71%. League level: BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 61%.
xG, shots and style
Westchester SC has higher xG: 1.52 vs 1.34. Westchester SC: 12.1 shots per match, Chattanooga Red Wolves: 10.9.
Match halves
Westchester SC: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.68. Chattanooga Red Wolves: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 1.10.
Goals by minute
Westchester SC: 16-30 (7 goals). Chattanooga Red Wolves: 46-60 (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL League One: 2.96 goals per match, BTTS 59%, Over 2.5 61%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 3 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-3. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 67%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Westchester SC make excellent use of home advantage: they win 60% of their home matches, score an average of 2.6 goals and concede just 1.0 per game. Chattanooga Red Wolves do average 1.8 goals away from home, but their defence allows opponents an average of 2.1 goals, and the team has kept not a single clean sheet. The hosts also create more chances, averaging 13.4 shots and 5.7 on target compared with 11.7 and 4.4 for the visitors, while their xG stands at 1.73 against the opponents’ 1.39. Recent form further favours Westchester, who have collected 8 points and conceded 6 goals in their last five matches, whereas Chattanooga have taken 4 points and allowed their opponents to score as many as 15 goals. The visitors are capable of finding the net, but Westchester SC’s attacking advantage at home and the Red Wolves’ significantly weaker defence point towards a Westchester SC win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The scenario of both teams scoring is primarily supported by Chattanooga, which recorded BTTS in 90% of its matches this season and in as many as 100% of its last 5 games. The visitors have kept no clean sheets, conceding an average of 2.1 goals per game this season and as many as 3.0 across their last five matches, while Westchester scores an average of 2.0 goals at home. However, Westchester should not be treated as a certainty to keep a clean sheet, as its opponents create an average xG of 1.79, rising to 1.95 over the last 5 rounds. Chattanooga scores an average of 1.8 goals and registers 4.4 shots on target per match, giving them a realistic chance to respond to a likely home goal. Westchester’s lower season BTTS rate of 40% and 50% clean-sheet record are counterarguments, but the visitors’ very weak current defensive form clearly strengthens the BTTS - Yes pick.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Westchester averages 2.0 goals per game, while Chattanooga concedes 2.1, creating favorable conditions for the hosts to score. In their last five matches, the visitors have scored 10 goals but conceded as many as 15, averaging 3.0 conceded per game. The 1.5 line was covered in 100% of Chattanooga’s matches and 60% of Westchester’s, while Over 2.5 goals occurred in 90% of the visitors’ games. Both teams regularly create chances, recording 3.8 and 4.4 shots on target per match, respectively, while their average xG against figures are high at 1.79 and 1.71. The strongest signal remains Over 1.5 goals, as even with more conservative chance conversion, the projected total of 3.05 goals clearly exceeds this line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is Westchester SC leading at the break and winning after the final whistle. The hosts were ahead at half-time in 4 of 10 matches, and in as many as 60% of their last five games, while Chattanooga were trailing at half-time in 5 of 10 matches and in 4 of their last 5. In their last five outings, Westchester conceded just 0.2 goals per match before the break, whereas during the same period the visitors allowed their opponents 1.8 goals in the first half. The hosts’ advantage is also evident over the full match: they won 60% of their games compared with Chattanooga’s 40%, while the visitors lost half of their matches and kept no clean sheets. Chattanooga average 1.8 goals scored, so a turnaround remains possible; however, the hosts’ defence, conceding an average of 1.1 goals and keeping a clean sheet in 50% of matches, further strengthens the 1/1 pick.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Westchester SC | Chattanooga Red Wolves | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.47 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Westchester SC is 25% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / match - Westchester SC · 0.8 pts / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Chattanooga Red Wolves is 23% better for: goals scored per match.
1.55 goals / match - Westchester SC · 1.9 goals / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves
Westchester SC is 8% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.55 goals / match - Westchester SC · 1.67 goals / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves
Westchester SC scores in 64% of matches (14 of 22 matches), while Chattanooga Red Wolves keeps a clean sheet in 24% (5 of 21 matches).
Chattanooga Red Wolves scores in 90% of matches (19 of 21 matches), while Westchester SC keeps a clean sheet in 18% (4 of 22 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Westchester SC
Over / Under - Chattanooga Red Wolves
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Westchester SC is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.36 pts / match - Westchester SC · 1.19 pts / match - Chattanooga Red Wolves
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Westchester SC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 27%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Chattanooga Red Wolves - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 48%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 100% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 0% |
| Goal difference | -4 | +1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (12 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Westchester SC
Chattanooga Red Wolves
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).
Teams vs league
| Westchester SC | Liga | Chattanooga Red Wolves | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.09 | 2.96 | ▲ 3.57 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 59% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 55% | 61% | ▲ 71% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 18% | 23% | • 24% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 82% | 73% | ▲ 81% |
| Goal after half-time | • 82% | 81% | ▲ 90% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (3): Westchester SC 0 - 0 - 3 Chattanooga Red Wolves. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 67% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Westchester SC vs Chattanooga Red Wolves?
The USL League One match finished Westchester SC 0:1 Chattanooga Red Wolves. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Westchester SC and Chattanooga Red Wolves?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Westchester SC won 0, Chattanooga Red Wolves won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Westchester SC vs Chattanooga Red Wolves?
Westchester SC score 1.55 goals per game on average and Chattanooga Red Wolves 1.90. The USL League One average is 2.96 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 61% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Westchester SC's matches and 67% of Chattanooga Red Wolves's.
What form are Westchester SC and Chattanooga Red Wolves in?
Over the last 5 games Westchester SC have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Chattanooga Red Wolves 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Westchester SC vs Chattanooga Red Wolves?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Westchester SC vs Chattanooga Red Wolves: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


