Westchester SC vs Spokane Velocity: match statistics
Westchester SC vs Spokane Velocity: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Westchester SC played Spokane Velocity in USL League One (United States). The match was played on 29 August 2026. Final score: 1:3.
Current form
Westchester SC: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match. Spokane Velocity: 4-0-1, 2.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Westchester SC scores 1.57 and concedes 1.48 goals per match. Spokane Velocity scores 1.45 and concedes 1.30. League average: 2.93 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Westchester SC 48%, Spokane Velocity 50%. Over 2.5: Westchester SC 52%, Spokane Velocity 65%. League level: BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 60%.
xG, shots and style
Westchester SC has higher xG: 1.52 vs 1.44. Westchester SC: 11.9 shots per match, Spokane Velocity: 12.0.
Match halves
Westchester SC: half-time lead 38%, second-half goals 0.71. Spokane Velocity: half-time lead 40%, second-half goals 0.70.
Goals by minute
Westchester SC: 16-30 (7 goals). Spokane Velocity: 16-30 (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
USL League One: 2.93 goals per match, BTTS 58%, Over 2.5 60%.
Head-to-head
Before this fixture, 4 previous H2H matches were available: 0-0-4. Average goals 3.75, BTTS 100%.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Westchester SC have been highly solid at home, winning 60% of such matches, averaging 2.6 goals scored and conceding just 1.0 per game. Spokane Velocity sit higher in the table and have scored 11 goals and recorded 3 wins in their last five matches, but their away figures are significantly weaker. On the road, the visitors win just 14% of their matches, lose 57%, average 0.57 goals scored, and fail to score in as many as 57% of away fixtures. The hosts also create more danger, averaging 5.7 shots on target compared with Spokane’s 3.29, while their conversion rate stands at 19% versus 5% for their opponents. Although the xG figures for both teams suggest relatively even chance-creation potential—1.73 for Westchester compared with 1.37 for the visitors—the hosts’ superior home performance supports a 1 result.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The signal for BTTS - Yes is moderately positive, as Westchester score an average of 1.92 goals per match, while Spokane have scored as many as 2.2 goals per game across their last five fixtures. The visitors recorded BTTS in 80% of their last five matches, while both teams conceded 1.2 goals per game during this period. Particularly significant is the fact that Westchester allowed opponents an xG of 1.95 in their last five matches, which clearly increases Spokane’s chances of finding the net. The hosts should also create opportunities, as their average xG stands at 1.48, while Spokane’s defence concedes an average of 1.57 goals. The main risk to the pick is Spokane’s low seasonal BTTS rate of 29%, along with the team’s average of just 0.57 goals scored per match; however, the visitors’ current attacking form slightly favours a scenario in which both teams score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Westchester averages 1.92 goals per game this season, while Spokane concedes 1.57, which clearly supports at least some home-team goal production. In their last five matches, both teams have been scoring regularly: Westchester averaged 1.6 goals and Spokane as many as 2.2, while each conceded an average of 1.2 goals. The 1.5 line was surpassed in 77% of Westchester’s matches and 71% of Spokane’s, while the league-wide average stands at a high 2.92 goals. Although Spokane’s season scoring efficiency is low at 0.57 goals per game, their recent form and Westchester’s xG of 1.95 against opponents in their last five appearances increase the likelihood of at least two goals. Over 1.5 is therefore the strongest pick, as it requires only a moderate number of goals and is supported by solid attacking indicators on both sides.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Westchester SC have won 77% of their matches this season and average 1.92 goals per game, while Spokane Velocity earn just 0.71 points per match and have lost 57% of their fixtures. The hosts are significantly more clinical in front of goal, converting 16% of their shots compared with just 5% for the visitors, who average only 0.57 goals per game. The scenario of Westchester taking a lead at the break is supported by their average of 0.85 first-half goals, compared with Spokane’s 0.57, while the hosts have been ahead at half-time in 60% of their last five matches. Their advantage should be maintained after the interval, as Westchester average 1.08 goals in second halves, whereas Spokane have averaged fewer than one goal in these periods and have lost 71% of them. The visitors’ stronger recent form, with three wins in their last five matches, reduces confidence in the selection, but the overall season profile still points most strongly to Westchester leading at half-time and securing the win at full-time: HT/FT 1/1.
View first-half and second-half statisticsHalf-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Westchester SC | Spokane Velocity | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Spokane Velocity is 50% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / match - Westchester SC · 2.4 pts / match - Spokane Velocity
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Westchester SC is 8% better for: goals scored per match.
1.57 goals / match - Westchester SC · 1.45 goals / match - Spokane Velocity
Spokane Velocity is 14% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.48 goals / match - Westchester SC · 1.3 goals / match - Spokane Velocity
Westchester SC scores in 62% of matches (13 of 21 matches), while Spokane Velocity keeps a clean sheet in 25% (5 of 20 matches).
Spokane Velocity scores in 70% of matches (14 of 20 matches), while Westchester SC keeps a clean sheet in 19% (4 of 21 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Westchester SC
Over / Under - Spokane Velocity
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Spokane Velocity is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.43 pts / match - Westchester SC · 1.55 pts / match - Spokane Velocity
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Westchester SC - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 38% of matches and wins 29%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Spokane Velocity - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 40% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +5 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +3 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Westchester SC
Spokane Velocity
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL League One).
Teams vs league
| Westchester SC | Liga | Spokane Velocity | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▲ 3.05 | 2.93 | ▼ 2.75 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 48% | 58% | ▼ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 52% | 60% | ▲ 65% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 19% | 24% | • 25% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 81% | 72% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | • 81% | 80% | ▲ 85% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (4): Westchester SC 0 - 0 - 4 Spokane Velocity. Average goals 3.75, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Westchester SC vs Spokane Velocity?
The USL League One match finished Westchester SC 1:3 Spokane Velocity. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Westchester SC and Spokane Velocity?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Westchester SC won 0, Spokane Velocity won 4 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.75 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Westchester SC vs Spokane Velocity?
Westchester SC score 1.57 goals per game on average and Spokane Velocity 1.45. The USL League One average is 2.93 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 60% of games. Both teams score in 48% of Westchester SC's matches and 50% of Spokane Velocity's.
What form are Westchester SC and Spokane Velocity in?
Over the last 5 games Westchester SC have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Spokane Velocity 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Westchester SC vs Spokane Velocity?
The statistical background for Westchester SC vs Spokane Velocity — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


